v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "User talk:79.66.211.99"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with 'If you're going to remove the pages for each type of ceramic, then you're going to need to deal with the raws for them - in fact, that's the entire reason why they have their own…') |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
If you're going to remove the pages for each type of ceramic, then you're going to need to deal with the raws for them - in fact, that's the entire reason why they have their own pages right now. --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 15:39, 25 February 2011 (UTC) | If you're going to remove the pages for each type of ceramic, then you're going to need to deal with the raws for them - in fact, that's the entire reason why they have their own pages right now. --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 15:39, 25 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | :I wasn't logged in for the edits it seems. I posted an explanation for the changes on the ceramic industry talk page but you'd already replied before I posted. I see your point and realise the folly of my changes; I'd imagine a roll back would be the easiest way to fix this? [[User:Vattic|Vattic]] 15:52, 25 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:52, 25 February 2011
If you're going to remove the pages for each type of ceramic, then you're going to need to deal with the raws for them - in fact, that's the entire reason why they have their own pages right now. --Quietust 15:39, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- I wasn't logged in for the edits it seems. I posted an explanation for the changes on the ceramic industry talk page but you'd already replied before I posted. I see your point and realise the folly of my changes; I'd imagine a roll back would be the easiest way to fix this? Vattic 15:52, 25 February 2011 (UTC)