- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
40d Talk:Stone
'Stone is divided into a few key categories:'
The statement that stone is divided into a few key categories means the categories are arranged in such a way so that each stone is in exactly one of them. "Metal ores", "gems" and "other stone" is one example of such a division. "Metal ores", "gems", and "economic stones" is an example of something that isn't. This is because everything that is a metal ore is also an economic stone. Here are two possible divisions:
- Economic stone
- Gems
- Other
- Ores
- Gems
- Other
In one case 'other' is everything that isnt economic or a gem. In the other case other is everything that isnt an ore or a gem. Since eventually more types of stone will have special uses, and the economic stone feature may be expanded to include everything, I think the second division is better. Thoughts? VengefulDonut 11:03, 28 January 2008 (EST)
Old stuff
Where did the ore and economic stones go?
I've moved the economic stone and ore categories to their own articles, as was suggested. I've reorganized this to reflect the change VengefulDonut 22:38, 6 November 2007 (EST)
- Oh! and if someone decides to make the ores redirect to the ore page instead of the stone page, keep in mind that it would be nicer of you to turn them into something like malachite instead VengefulDonut 22:42, 6 November 2007 (EST)
I notice that Economic stone lists economic + metal ores, my edit to the stone page divides it as the stockpiles do. -- infinity
Is there any kind of stone that isn't mineable? If not, then I don't think that "Mineable Stone" makes sense as a section header. --Peristarkawan 13:36, 31 October 2007 (EDT)
Good point, I think I was trying to separate that from "soil" and other things that don't leave behind anything ... I shouldn't edit so early in the morning. --Infinity 20:45, 31 October 2007 (EDT)
Now all we need is graphical representations! Schm0 16:24, 1 November 2007 (EDT)
What about ICE BLOCKS? those count as stones for some purposes. --Thehunterunseen 19:27, 1 November 2007 (EDT)
- I haven't been able to get my dorfs to do anything with ice blocks yet. Haven't managed them to go down (or up) the stairs into the frozen river I had anyway, so... (I was explicitly trying NOT to mine out the side of it)--Draco18s 00:48, 2 November 2007 (EDT)
Shouldn't raw adamantine be under metal ore as opposed to "other stone"? --RedKing 00:43, 2 November 2007 (EDT)
- It's probably due to where it's grouped in the raws. --Alfador 14:40, 2 November 2007 (EDT)
Why are we listing platinum nuggets instead of native platinum, when talking about it in it's unmined state? --Trukkle 10:23, 3 November 2007 (EDT)
I am thinking about implementing a more detailed table style for this area. The existing tables are nice, but there should be much more information on this page. Perhaps something like this:
| Name | Tile | Type | Uses |
|---|---|---|---|
| Olivine |   |
Generic | Stoneworking |
What do you guys think? Schm0 15:41, 3 November 2007 (EDT)
- I really like that, Schm0 --Tracker 18:29, 3 November 2007 (EDT)
- I agree it looks good, but can it be accomplished without using gifs? we have a raw tile template so we could do something like this:
| Name | Tiles | Type | Uses | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olivine | % • ╬║═ | Generic | Stoneworking | 1 |
| Microcline | % • ╬║═ | Generic | Stoneworking | 1 |
| Platinum Nuggets (Mined) | * • ╬║═ | Metal Ore | Stoneworking, Smelting | 40 |
--Matryx 06:10, 5 November 2007 (EST)
Someone, with correct formatting, add this to the bottom of the page. http://idisk.mac.com/fire_drake-Public/DF_StoneOre_Table.htm -penguin
- I'd try, but what does the 'V' or 'C' mean in the table? --Valdemar 10:06, 4 November 2007 (EST)
- "vein" and "cluster" VengefulDonut 17:29, 4 November 2007 (EST)
- Okay, I've added something like it with some of my own formatting through a program, but it will still need a lot of cleanup. --Valdemar 17:53, 4 November 2007 (EST)
Individual pages
I'm of the opinion that ores and economic stones should probably get their own page, but the rest can just redirect here. There just isn't much to say about cryolite or jet. They're rocks, they have about such-and-such a value, the end. How about it? --Turgid Bolk 20:59, 4 November 2007 (EST)
- Yes, the pages about the all the stones in the 'other stone' category should be deleted, any information about them can just be included in the table on this page. All the info from the raws is now summed up in the table. --Valdemar 21:06, 4 November 2007 (EST)
- Instead of deleting, let's redirect to this page. Just replace them with #REDIRECT [[Stone]]. (The #R button above the edit box helps with this.) --Turgid Bolk 22:13, 4 November 2007 (EST)
On different note, I think that Ores should be on a separate page to Stone. I don't consider 'Ore' to be stone, although I agree there is little difference in the way that stones and ore operate in the game. One alternative; add information about metal ores to the metals page, which doesn't exist at the moment, ores could more usefully redirect there. I was trying to find out what metals tetrahedtrite produced by starting on the metal page, but found no reference. I was then confused to find myself redirect from ores to stones. --Markavian 21:09, 6 November 2007 (EST)
- An ore: A mineral or an aggregate of minerals from which a valuable constituent, especially a metal, can be profitably mined or extracted. Answers.com/ore
- Perhaps you would have found the tetrahedrite page helpful. (look at the beautiful template) VengefulDonut 21:18, 6 November 2007 (EST)
- Unfortunately, not all of the ores have beautiful templated pages like that just yet. You can help VengefulDonut 21:21, 6 November 2007 (EST)
- I did see the tetrahedrite page eventually, it was very plush. I look forward to the other ores exhibiting a similar likeness. :) --Markavian
Does anyone know what calcareous ooze is, or what siliceous ooze is? It's listed as a stone under the stockpile menu. Bouchart 02:27, 23 November 2007 (EST)
Stones water permeability
hi all! can someone tell me where I can find water permeability of stone?
I didn´t find it...
and could someone tell me how mica wall reacts on water? (I am looking for the cave river...digging nets and such stuff)—Preceding unsigned comment added by EdwinBG2 (talk•contribs)
- The types of stone listed as an aquifer are permeable and those that aren't aren't. The only two types of stone aquifer are sandstone and conglomerate. If that doesn't help, you may be asking about a feature I have't heard of yet; could you explain? VengefulDonut 10:02, 24 December 2007 (EST)
- ok thank you! that was exacly what I meant! I risk it...(could be a sea and my legendary miner is dead...no risk no fun!)
Petrified wood
does petrified wood count as wood or stone? also, does it count as fire-safe?--0todd0 21:57, 3 June 2008 (EDT)