Difference between revisions of "Dwarf Fortress Wiki:Administrative intervention against vandalism"

From Dwarf Fortress Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Reports: 2c from a non-admin)
(Reports)
Line 15: Line 15:
 
Reporting user [[Special:Contributions/75.163.224.80|75.163.224.80]] for this [http://df.magmawiki.com/index.php?title=DF2010:Adventure_mode_quick_start&curid=18784&diff=152872&oldid=152303 edit] --[[User:Cali|Cali]] 04:20, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 
Reporting user [[Special:Contributions/75.163.224.80|75.163.224.80]] for this [http://df.magmawiki.com/index.php?title=DF2010:Adventure_mode_quick_start&curid=18784&diff=152872&oldid=152303 edit] --[[User:Cali|Cali]] 04:20, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 
:At Wikipedia we'd call that a "test edit" - most likely the first ever wiki edit by a young person who didn't quite believe they could change the internet.  My bet is that there won't be any further disruption from that IP address, so no administrator action is required. [[User:Bognor|Bognor]] 14:56, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 
:At Wikipedia we'd call that a "test edit" - most likely the first ever wiki edit by a young person who didn't quite believe they could change the internet.  My bet is that there won't be any further disruption from that IP address, so no administrator action is required. [[User:Bognor|Bognor]] 14:56, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 +
:: I tend to agree here. --[[User:Briess|Briess]] 07:06, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
  
 
Pre-emptive, but I'm guessing the following are not genuine new-user registrations...<br>
 
Pre-emptive, but I'm guessing the following are not genuine new-user registrations...<br>

Revision as of 07:06, 9 September 2011

Instructions
  1. Reported edits must constitute vandalism.
  2. Link both an example of the user's vandalism and the user's talk page.
  3. Add report to top of list. Use format: #Reporting user [[User_talk:Briess|Briess]] for edits [link], [link] and [link] ~~~~
  4. Please sign the report.
  5. If a report has remained here for more than 24 hour, please leave a message on an admin's talk page.

Reports

Reporting user 75.163.224.80 for this edit --Cali 04:20, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

At Wikipedia we'd call that a "test edit" - most likely the first ever wiki edit by a young person who didn't quite believe they could change the internet. My bet is that there won't be any further disruption from that IP address, so no administrator action is required. Bognor 14:56, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
I tend to agree here. --Briess 07:06, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Pre-emptive, but I'm guessing the following are not genuine new-user registrations...
(User creation log); 09:14 . . Download Love That Girl! - Season One 1080p movie New user account
(User creation log); 08:44 . . Download 60 Minutes Australia - 2011 Full movie New user account
194.200.65.239 10:29, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

  1. Reporting IP Address 124.6.181.189 for an edit which I have reverted. --Jwest23 16:03, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
  2. Reporting IP Address 124.6.181.183 for an edit which I have reverted. --Jwest23 19:05, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
  3. Reporting user Jose for an edit which I have reverted. --Jwest23 18:06, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

There was a link insertion at Talk:Main_Page/Quote/archive1 by an anonymous IP. I undid it, not sure if other measures need to be taken. Knight Otu 19:10, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

There was a vandalism at "http://df.magmawiki.com/index.php/DF2010:Ruin". -- Dragongutz

No there wasn't - the article history clearly indicates that the article has never had any content. --Quietust 21:41, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

reporting user User:Jalohear [link]

Interestingly, that user (and 2 others) signed up over a week ago and sat dormant this entire time. The bastards are trying to get sneaky... --Quietust 21:50, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
I've seen vandalized main pages like that on the other wikis under attack. I'm not sure, but I think they start doing that only after they've "burrowed" into the site for an extended period of time. I believe the goal is to keep their spam links a part of the wiki for as long as possible. Uristocrat 08:18, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
I suspect they were remaining dormant in order to get past the "new user" stage and gain the ability to edit semi-protected pages. --Quietust 17:21, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
I've modified new user stage so that you have to have made 10 edits before you can edit semiprotected articles or create new articles, in addition to the 3 day wait period. --Briess 17:30, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
I'm glad. Sounds like that should help. Although, I just tried to create my user profile (Thundercraft) and it gave me a Permission error, it said "You do not have permission to create new pages." (I do not have 10 edits yet.) Perhaps you should make user profiles exempt from this rule? Also, I would recommend mentioning to new members about these requirements. Otherwise, it could mean a lot of confused new members at a lot of complaints. You would not have to be specific, however. You could just say that "several edits" are required before that privilege is granted. --Thundercraft 23:01:23, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
I made your user profile page for you. An admin will have to do anything else. Also, I have confirmation now that the webspam team at Google is taking a look at this. They're interested because it's not just this wiki, there are thousands of others being vandalized by spammers and their real goal is to get their crap into the search engines. That probably won't stop the spambots from vandalizing things, but it will help keep them from profiting from this. Uristocrat 08:39, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
I'll look into permissions today and see if I can get user page creation working for newly registered users. Also, you're probably right about needing a notice of some sort for this change. --Briess 16:56, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Both User_talk:DaisyBarrett DaisyBarrett (example) and User_talk:SunshineMcfadden SunshineMcfadden (example) have added link-spam marked as minor edits. Link spam is the only edits these two users have done. -- Khym Chanur 20:44, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Did you not notice that their edits were undone and I banned both of them 9 hours ago? --Quietust 21:15, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

There was a single spam edit by 124.6.181.171, which I've reverted. Bognor 07:21, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Personal tools

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox
Advertisement