- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
Difference between revisions of "User talk:PeridexisErrant"
(→"Melt item" rating: new section) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Could you explain why you rated [[DF2014:Melt item]] as "tattered"? —[[User:Lethosor|<span style="color:#074">Lethosor</span>]] ([[User talk:Lethosor|<span style="color:#092">talk</span>]]) 21:00, 18 May 2015 (UTC) | Could you explain why you rated [[DF2014:Melt item]] as "tattered"? —[[User:Lethosor|<span style="color:#074">Lethosor</span>]] ([[User talk:Lethosor|<span style="color:#092">talk</span>]]) 21:00, 18 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think the rating script is suggesting that rating because of the number of {{tl|verify}} tags - taking the rest of the article into account, I'm not sure it deserves that rating. —[[User:Lethosor|<span style="color:#074">Lethosor</span>]] ([[User talk:Lethosor|<span style="color:#092">talk</span>]]) 03:10, 19 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | That was it. Since you think they should be discounted here, I've re-rated it as Superior. | ||
Latest revision as of 04:29, 19 May 2015
Category links[edit]
The problem you likely ran across at Utility:Stonesense/Tutorials is solved by adding a colon in front of the link, like this: Category:Stonesense. --Lethosor (talk) 19:43, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
Re: Old pages[edit]
I've added this script to your common.js page. Can you test it out and let me know if there are any problems with it? —Lethosor (talk) 17:16, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
It's working perfectly so far! PeridexisErrant (talk) 01:28, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
Wait, too soon. It also shows the banner on pages not in one of the old release namespaces, eg here. PeridexisErrant (talk) 07:16, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
"Melt item" rating[edit]
Could you explain why you rated DF2014:Melt item as "tattered"? —Lethosor (talk) 21:00, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
I think the rating script is suggesting that rating because of the number of {{verify}} tags - taking the rest of the article into account, I'm not sure it deserves that rating. —Lethosor (talk) 03:10, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
That was it. Since you think they should be discounted here, I've re-rated it as Superior.