- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Voliol"
(preferred solution) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Hi - first, good work as an editor, thanks! Now...<br> | Hi - first, good work as an editor, thanks! Now...<br> | ||
This should not be "removed" - information should never simply be deleted, neither article content nor active/useful Search terms. However, agreed re extreme Stub and re Rule F. So, unless/until enough is known about "traitor" to justify its own article, this will become a #REDIRECT and what info there is moved to another page - for now (and only unless someone has a better location), [[DF2014:Agent]]. Good call that the page needs to go, so now don't be shy to practice [[Dwarf Fortress Wiki:Community Portal#B|Rule B]]. ;) [[User:Albedo|Albedo]] ([[User talk:Albedo|talk]]) 01:21, 18 June 2020 (UTC) | This should not be "removed" - information should never simply be deleted, neither article content nor active/useful Search terms. However, agreed re extreme Stub and re Rule F. So, unless/until enough is known about "traitor" to justify its own article, this will become a #REDIRECT and what info there is moved to another page - for now (and only unless someone has a better location), [[DF2014:Agent]]. Good call that the page needs to go, so now don't be shy to practice [[Dwarf Fortress Wiki:Community Portal#B|Rule B]]. ;) [[User:Albedo|Albedo]] ([[User talk:Albedo|talk]]) 01:21, 18 June 2020 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Ah yes, the reason I simply commented on it (and did some miniature cleaning) is that [[User:Antsy555|Antsy555]] is seemingly a new editor, and I didn’t want to scare them off in case they were to return with more info. Otherwise I would have simply marked it for <nowiki>{{deletion}}</nowiki> (as one unverified sentence doesn’t really say much, imho). A redirect is the better solution though, this way an article remains to be salvaged if needed. Thank you :) [[User:Voliol|Voliol]] ([[User talk:Voliol|talk]]) 01:43, 18 June 2020 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 01:43, 18 June 2020
Delete Stub "DF2014:Traitor"
Hi - first, good work as an editor, thanks! Now...
This should not be "removed" - information should never simply be deleted, neither article content nor active/useful Search terms. However, agreed re extreme Stub and re Rule F. So, unless/until enough is known about "traitor" to justify its own article, this will become a #REDIRECT and what info there is moved to another page - for now (and only unless someone has a better location), DF2014:Agent. Good call that the page needs to go, so now don't be shy to practice Rule B. ;) Albedo (talk) 01:21, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Ah yes, the reason I simply commented on it (and did some miniature cleaning) is that Antsy555 is seemingly a new editor, and I didn’t want to scare them off in case they were to return with more info. Otherwise I would have simply marked it for {{deletion}} (as one unverified sentence doesn’t really say much, imho). A redirect is the better solution though, this way an article remains to be salvaged if needed. Thank you :) Voliol (talk) 01:43, 18 June 2020 (UTC)