User talk:Voliol

Delete Stub "DF2014:Traitor"

Hi - first, good work as an editor, thanks! Now...
This should not be "removed" - information should never simply be deleted, neither article content nor active/useful Search terms. However, agreed re extreme Stub and re Rule F. So, unless/until enough is known about "traitor" to justify its own article, this will become a #REDIRECT and what info there is moved to another page - for now (and only unless someone has a better location), DF2014:Agent. Good call that the page needs to go, so now don't be shy to practice Rule B. ;) Albedo (talk) 01:21, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Ah yes, the reason I simply commented on it (and did some miniature cleaning) is that Antsy555 is seemingly a new editor, and I didn’t want to scare them off in case they were to return with more info. Otherwise I would have simply marked it for {{deletion}} (as one unverified sentence doesn’t really say much, imho). A redirect is the better solution though, this way an article remains to be salvaged if needed. Thank you :) Voliol (talk) 01:43, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

modding

concerning, I do agree that it would detract from the flow to the rest of the article, but have a different idea of how to approach this. I have started a discussion about the future of the entry DF2014_Talk:Modding#Split and would apricate your input on subject. --Jan (talk) 13:37, 2 January 2022 (UTC)