v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
  • v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
  • Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.

v0.34 Talk:Material science

From Dwarf Fortress Wiki
Revision as of 20:45, 2 December 2012 by UristDaVinci (talk | contribs) (→‎Updated page: reply to question)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

I don't understand what the first paragraph in the "Effects on Combat" section mean, so I am leaving them alone for now. If no one else can make sense of them they should probably be removed. I am starting to add the results of our ballistics testing to the combat section. --Pirate Bob 22:19, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

It would be very nice to add Urist's flowchart to the "Interactions between projectiles and armor" section. It might also be nice if the flowchart could somehow be highlighted to emphasize which sections of the text correspond to which parts of the flowchart, but I don't know if this is feasible. --Pirate Bob 22:49, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

The ratio involved in "The projectile absorbs the force of the collision" seems kind of odd. We should investigate if there are actually more parameters determining this at some point.--Pirate Bob 23:11, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Sorry about that, the fraction 800/157 is equal to 40000/7850. It is this way because a size 100 ammo will deflect off iron armor if the ammo has an IMPACT_YIELD less than 40000. We did investigate the other parameters and they don't apply to that equation. --UristDaVinci 06:11, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Perhaps we should put links to Toady One posts on the forums in a section on this page, as "Word of Toady" on how the system works. --UristDaVinci 06:11, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Updated page

Good work updating the page, but I'm a little confused by "As explained below, wood bolts are capable of fracturing through the strongest metal armor, and would fracture copper or steel armor were it not for the higher densities of those metals." Emufarmers 10:24, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Look at the flowchart. If copper, steel, bronze, or iron were not so dense (or wood so fragile), wood bolts would be able to fracture a hole in the armor and deal damage. Adamantine is stronger than steel, but provides less protection against wood bolts only because of the low density of adamantine. Can you think of a better way to explain that? --UristDaVinci 20:45, 2 December 2012 (UTC)