<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://dwarffortresswiki.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Iapetus</id>
	<title>Dwarf Fortress Wiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://dwarffortresswiki.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Iapetus"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://dwarffortresswiki.org/index.php/Special:Contributions/Iapetus"/>
	<updated>2026-04-10T11:00:05Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.11</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://dwarffortresswiki.org/index.php?title=40d_Talk:Noble&amp;diff=60221</id>
		<title>40d Talk:Noble</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://dwarffortresswiki.org/index.php?title=40d_Talk:Noble&amp;diff=60221"/>
		<updated>2009-12-28T10:20:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Iapetus: /* Nobles: Now usefull */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Nobles affected by Reclaiming? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My current fortress is a reclaimed one, due to a fire that got into one of my guardtowers' food storage. In the old fortress, I had managed to get a Baron, who was soon skipping right up to Duke and Incoming king after a couple of immigrants. Well, after reclaiming, I proceeded as normal, except, even though my value is still incredibly high from the fortress (1 million+ created wealth, and 400k exported, now), I recieved a count within it's specified area of requirement, but not the Baron before. Even still, My Count does not seem to be upgrading to Duke anytime soon, seeing as I have 188 dwarves, now. Anyone have any ideas, now? [[User:Jwguy|Jwguy]] 12:56, 6 June 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Noble Additions and Requirements ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Added the dungeon keeper noble. He just showed up at my fort in year 1053. --[[User:Idles|Idles]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm &amp;quot;fixing&amp;quot; the change, &amp;quot;16:59, 31 October 2007 Lightning4 (Talk | contribs) (1,934 bytes) (→Appointments - Isn't called bookkeeper, at least when the fortress is new.)&amp;quot;, because in my forts it IS called bookkeeper when the fortress starts.  Other edits have backed me up, suspect editor was confused--Please discuss this here? --[[User:Sowelu|Sowelu]] 15:09, 31 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I apologize, I was indeed incorrect. You do start with a Bookkeeper, which in very short order can be upgraded to a Treasurer. Unsure of requirements, possibly only requires 20 dwarves like the sheriff. My fortress has one and I haven't even done anything besides changed who had bookkeeping and set it to higher priority (did not build study yet). That's probably what got me confused since the bookkeeper upgrades very quickly. [[User:Lightning4|Lightning4]] 18:11, 31 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, 20 dwarves sounds accurate enough to put in there.  He didn't turn when I had only 17. --[[User:Sowelu|Sowelu]] 18:14, 31 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Your original expedition leader will be the fourth dwarf down in the starting screen(the one in the middle).&amp;quot; This does not seem to hold true; I have a newly-developed habit of making the last dwarf on the screen (used to be my designated hauler-peasant) into the administrator, with all the social skills for filling the four starter noble roles. He gets auto-assigned to all four administrative positions; I'm thinking that instead of being fixed or random, the starting assignment is based on social skills. --[[User:Alfador|Alfador]] 00:29, 1 November 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I had a Philosopher show up last night. I'm unsure of the requirement to get him; the only really notable thing that had happened was I got over 100 dwarves. I'm adding him to the list of Nobles, though, since I can confirm he still exists in the new version. I also divided the page structure between Appointed and Immigrant nobles, since the current header was misleading (Dungeon Master and Philosopher cannot be appointed). --[[User:Zurai|Zurai]] 20:55, 10 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I had the king show up tonight.  &amp;quot;The King arrives, dressed as a peasant.&amp;quot;  I have no idea what the requirements were.  I missed the 1051 and 1052 dwarf caravans due to prolonged sieges, and had no immigrants those years.  1053 I had the caravan; a season later a wave of immigration brought my total dwarves up to 37.  In the spring the king arrived, along with enough others to bring the population to 63.  At that time I was notified that the Captain of the Guard position was available.  Only thing I can think is that I hit adamantine during the siege years, and mistakenly built a number of ridiculously valuable adamantine objects. (Door, Coffin, etc.)  This has raised my fortress value to 1.3 million.  Is 1 million value perhaps the trigger?  I have no coins, and no nobles other than the starting 4 positions.  I did not appoint a sheriff. [[User:Doctorlucky|Doctorlucky]] 04:15, 15 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:In the last version, hitting adamantine without proper requirement for the king triggered the reaction of having the king arrive dressed as a paysant. Maybe it's the same here. --[[User:Eagle of Fire|Eagle of Fire]] 04:20, 15 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What determines expedition leader? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a number of situations to test out:&lt;br /&gt;
* No social skills on any dwarves&lt;br /&gt;
** ''Probably random, possibly based on the Dwarf's thoughts and preferences''&lt;br /&gt;
* Majority of social skills on one dwarf (various positions in start order)&lt;br /&gt;
** ''Test case 1: only one dwarf has social skills - gives that dwarf as leader and all positions''&lt;br /&gt;
* Social skills spread between multiple dwarves&lt;br /&gt;
** Is there any weight on which skill determines the leader?&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Shagie|Shagie]] 01:25, 1 November 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Is the first point certain?  In my current fortress, I didn't assign any social skills to any dwarf, and I'm pretty certain that the dwarf that ended up expedition leader was the seventh in the list. --[[User:Peristarkawan|Peristarkawan]] 02:28, 2 November 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::In my current fort I assigned no social skills and the first dwarf in the list, one of my miners, is the expedition leader. --[[User:Moller|Moller]] 02:40, 2 November 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Might be randomised then, I started three new fortresses for the test and each time it was the same so I made an assumption. Obviously this isn't the case can you two check what thoughts/prefs you have for those so we can look for some leadership criteria. --[[User:Shades|Shades]] 08:10, 2 November 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::It's almost always been the first dwarf for me (assuming no one had leadership skills), but I could have sworn one time it assigned someone else. Maybe it defaults to the first dwarf on the list but can sometimes choose someone else under certain conditions. [[User:Rpb|Rpb]] 22:29, 10 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Perhaps the first dwarf didn't get it because of negative preferences? Some dwarves have a line in their thoughts/prefs that reads something like &amp;quot;X prefers to let others take leadership roles&amp;quot;. [[User:Tocky|Tocky]] 11:04, 11 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Room requirements==&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe something about the nobles requiring better rooms and how to build them? --[[User:Mizipzor|Mizipzor]] 15:15, 4 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Found it in [[room]]s, adding a link. --[[User:Mizipzor|Mizipzor]] 15:34, 4 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[How do I increase the value of a room quickly and easily]] page seems to be a pretty helpful page, but so far what links to it may not be much help when someone is in a pinch with their nobles ([[Door]], [[Room]], [[Furniture]] and the [[Frequently Asked Questions]]).  After all, I assume that page exists for that constant problem with nobles where your new Duke requests a &amp;quot;Grand&amp;quot; dining room and DAMMIT, the best you can do is a &amp;quot;Decent&amp;quot; dining room and that sweet, kick-ass, dolomite dining table with the chrysoberyls the image of a dwarf striking down a goblin isn't ready yet because your legendary Gem Setter is &amp;quot;Attending Party&amp;quot;.  So perhaps a link on the Nobles page should also exist?  [[User:3lB33|3lB33]] 15:07, 2 September 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:New pages are largely useless without links - feel free!  If you see a need, then, by definition, there is one.--[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 17:11, 2 September 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The room requirement for consorts is not clear. Seeing that they are married, don't they share a single bedroom with their spouse? Is this an exception to the law of marriage? The same questions hold for dining rooms and tombs. --[[User:Aykavil|Aykavil]] 09:18, 14 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's perfectly clear. Lovers like to have their own rooms, even if they never use them.  (When you start dating, you'll understand.)--[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 18:04, 14 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Except that consorts are not ''dating'', they are [[Marriage|''married'']].  (When you are married, you'll understand.) --[[User:Aykavil|Aykavil]] 10:58, 15 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You're married, and you don't wish you had your own room sometimes? Let me put it this way - maybe the DF royals don't know about this &amp;quot;law of marriage&amp;quot; (and law of dining, and law of dying) that you adhere to. Or, maybe you've just never been dwarven royalty. If it's still not clear, then just accept that.--[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 15:02, 15 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Surely, you've noticed that you are contradicting what's currently written on the [[Marriage]] page. So if you're positive about the game mechanics, you should update that page. If you're not positive, that's when the ''still not clear'' kicks in. --[[User:Aykavil|Aykavil]] 07:32, 16 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems that rhetorical questions and pointed hints are ineffective, so here is how to read the chart; we'll use the King/Queen and Consort as our example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
!Noble!!Quarters!!Dining Room!!Office!!Tomb&lt;br /&gt;
|- align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|- align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!King&lt;br /&gt;
|bgcolor=&amp;quot;#ffff00&amp;quot;|Royal Bedroom||bgcolor=&amp;quot;#ffff00&amp;quot;|Royal Dining Room||bgcolor=&amp;quot;#ffff00&amp;quot;|Royal Throne Room||bgcolor=&amp;quot;#ffff00&amp;quot;|Royal Mausoleum&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|- align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!King/Queen Consort&lt;br /&gt;
|bgcolor=&amp;quot;#ffff00&amp;quot;|Royal Quarters||bgcolor=&amp;quot;#ffff00&amp;quot;|Royal Dining Room||—||bgcolor=&amp;quot;#ffff00&amp;quot;|Royal Mausoleum&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The position under &amp;quot;Noble&amp;quot; is the noble the chart is referring to.  The listing under &amp;quot;Quarters&amp;quot; are the quarters that ''that dwarf'' wants, the listing under &amp;quot;Dining Room&amp;quot; is the dining room that ''that dwarf'' wants, and so on. There is nothing to imply that one noble will be happy with a related noble's rooms - a Baron doesn't use a King's Throne Room or Dining Hall, an Advisor doesn't use the King's Office, and neither does ''any other noble''. So, both a King and his consort want'' their own'' Royal Bedroom, Royal Dining Room, and Royal Mausoleum, and in addition the King wants a Royal Throne Room for his Office. You can share rooms between royals, but that reduces the perceived value significantly.  I can find no reference to a &amp;quot;Law of Marriage&amp;quot; on the page - any assumptions not specifically listed or addressed in this chart are yours alone. If this is ''still not clear'', the requirements for individual nobles are clearly listed in their individual article pages: '''[[king]]''' and '''[[King consort|royal consort]]'''.  If that's ''still not clear'', I'd suggest asking in the forums, because this format doesn't have time or space to serve your special needs.--[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 18:50, 16 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: When you assign a bed to a [[Marriage|married]] dwarf, its automatically also assigned to his/her spouse. This is not a case of overlapping rooms, but of a single room belonging to two different dwarves. It's easy to see this by yourself by taking a look at your married dwarves and their bedroom arrangements.--[[User:Aykavil|Aykavil]] 20:08, 16 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: I did some thorough testing and updated the [[Marriage]] and [[Noble]] page accordingly. [[Albedo]], I'm afraid that your comments on this topic were both rude and unhelpful. --[[User:Aykavil|Aykavil]] 20:57, 26 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Er, if I assign a bedroom to my Duchess, my Duke Consort does '''not''' use it (and his room requirements will show up in red). Married nobles are a very specific exception to the rule of spouses sharing rooms. --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 02:26, 27 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Not 100? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just received migrants.  My population went from 76 to 100, and my settlement went from a village to a town.  No nobles arrived with the migrants. [[User:Geekwad|Geekwad]] 17:14, 18 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Still a town at 108&lt;br /&gt;
:Another wave, and we're a city at 111 (migrants still incoming)&lt;br /&gt;
::My population went from 101 to 126 in one wave.  A Baroness arrived at the same time and turned my settlement into a Barony.  Shortly afterwards, my settlement turned into a County (125+ dwarves?).  Then Baroness upgraded into a Countess.  Baron consort upgraded to a Count Consort.--[[User:Slumber|Slumber]] 16:49, 19 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Next immigration wave, my pop hit 138.  Nothing happens.  Then next immigration wave, my pop hits 141, the Countess upgrades to Duchess and the Count Consort upgrades to Duke Consort.  Also, &amp;quot;Incoming King&amp;quot; is the top line on the Nobles screen.  When you select it, it shows you what you need to achieve in terms of 1. architecture value (15000) 2. road value (5000) and 3. offerings value. (5000).  I'm not sure what criteria triggers the King as it happened at the same time as my Duchess.  I did just hit 200k exported wealth.  Conincedence? --[[User:Slumber|Slumber]] 10:27, 20 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Another wave, jumped to 161 pop, and some more nobles, a Duke and his Duke Consort.  Now I have both a Duke and Duchess!--[[User:Slumber|Slumber]] 14:06, 20 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I was made a city and a barony at 110, and promoted to county almost immediately after. No new immigration happened, and I hadn't reached the 120 mark yet. [[User:Rpb|Rpb]] 16:27, 24 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The last immigration wave brought me from 98 to a total of 124 including baron/consort, tax collector and hammerer. It is now a City and a Barony. I'll watch out if it changes on the first immigrant from the next wave.I currently have over 500k created wealth and 17000 exported.--[[User:Another|Another]] 16:05, 24 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:One child is born and now my total population is 125. Still a City and a Barony.--[[User:Another|Another]] 09:23, 25 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:My fortress was upgraded to County when the caravan left the map and my exported wealth leaped from 17k to 26k. The trigger for the County must be either 20k or 25k exported wealth. --[[User:Another|Another]] 12:47, 25 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Baron arrived during an immigration wave going from 88 to 112 dwarves, and upgraded to a Count not long after arrival but ''not'' immediately either (perhaps as the population went over 100?). Exported wealth was probably around 50k at the time. Now at 119 (and 80k exported) and not yet a Duke. Looks like there's a combination of factors involved. [[User:Cim|Cim]] 11:10, 14 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Upgrade of the fortress to Duchy was at exactly 140th dwarf from an immigration wave. &amp;quot;The Incoming King&amp;quot; included. Total created wealth - 950k, total exported - 30k.--[[User:Another|Another]] 16:37, 1 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
: My Baron arrived in the immigration wave that took me over 100 (I had peaked at 96 previously) but this was also the season where I crossed the 50,000 threshold on exported wealth. I actually went from 48,000 to 62,000 over the course of the year, and the baron arrived in the Spring, I did have an immigration wave after crossing 50,000 in the fall. Almost immediately after my baron arrived, he was promoted to count. My population is 119. --[[User:Mitchy|Mitchy]] 16:41, 3 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:At exported wealth 45k, my Baron promoted to Count at the 110th immigrant. (Baron arrived in the first immigration wave after getting 80 population, can't remember what exported wealth was then) [[User:Cim|Cim]] 20:12, 5 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Population at 93 no Baron. Next wave - first person to arrive is a Countess, with this wave population went to 114. (So, had no Baron at all) --[[User:Dorten|Dorten]] 23:39, 10 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Verified about 140 limit for Duke. My Wrestler have given birth to a boy, the populationd got to 140, and the next message is about the fortress becoming a capital of Duchy. --[[User:Dorten|Dorten]] 00:10, 24 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Queen As Peasant ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I had dug out some raw adamantine, not done anything with it, and I got a notification that 'Your ruler has arrived disguised as a peasant.'  At the same time, my Dungeon Master arrived.  I don't have an announcement in the log about the Queen, but I do about the DM.  I'm treating her like it's legit, what's the deal?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Your ruler has heard of the discovery of adamantine, and hurried to yuor fort to oversee the digging. She turned up &amp;quot;disguised as a peasant&amp;quot; because your fort doesn't meet the regular requirements for attracting the monarch and moving to your site officially would be embarassing (in roleplaying/story terms of course). She's perfectly legit, just wasn't attracted in the &amp;quot;conventional&amp;quot; sense by having the largest, wealthiest fort in the civilisation you belong to.--[[User:TangoThree|TangoThree]] 06:42, 26 April 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Baron mandates &amp;quot;crowns&amp;quot;? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just got a baron, and the first thing he mandates is two crowns. So i type Crown into the jobs/manager list. nothing. So I type crown in dwarf wiki. Nothing. Can anyone help before I have to drop this noble into a pit to keep him from locking up my crafters?&lt;br /&gt;
:Info about specific crafts isn't present in the new wiki, but a crown is in fact a &amp;quot;craft&amp;quot; item. [http://archive.dwarffortresswiki.net/index.php/Craftsdwarf%27s_Workshop#Crafts You can see the old wiki info about crafts here]. You'll probably need to set several crafting jobs to get a crown since the item produced by a crafting task is random with several possibilities. --[[User:Janus|Janus]] 00:06, 1 February 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Killing nobles ? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is killing nobles dangerous ? (does it stop immigrations or something ?) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because I've got a Count totally uncontrolable, who can't stop throwing tantrums in the middle of my fortress, which is somewhat tiresome... So, if I just can lock him into his bedroom and let him starve to death, it would be great, but I don't know if it won't cause more problems..&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Also, sorry for my bad english, I'm french) &lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Timst|Timst]] 05:40, 26 April 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Killing off your nobles only really has the penalties associated with killing any other dwarf - their friends and family will be upset, and you lose that dwarf's abilities. In the case of nobles a replacement will usually turn up with the next migrant wave, unless your fort no longer meets the requirements for that noble. You can, of course, kill the replacement too - with lesser repercussions as he won't have had time to make any friends yet.--[[User:TangoThree|TangoThree]] 06:38, 26 April 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Ok, thanks :) I was afraid that the death of a count could induct a reaction of the mountainhomes or something like that... If the only reaction will be the one of the countess, it will be ok :) [[User:Timst|Timst]] 07:00, 26 April 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::In the future, killing off a noble will have repercussions, however, so don't depend on that behaviour forever. ;-)&lt;br /&gt;
:::''Req291, NOBLE DEATH, (Future): Killing off nobles needs to have serious consequences. Once the counties (see Core28) are in, there could be revolts from the village if the count is popular. Other nobles could have angry relatives. Losing your law enforcement nobles could lead to more tantrums and other acts in large fortresses. Nobles should all be upset by the death of the tax collector. When a noble is buried, other dwarves could be sealed in the tomb.''&lt;br /&gt;
:::--[[User:JT|JT]] 15:11, 26 April 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::This doesn't sound like it has much effect on a &amp;quot;kill early, kill often&amp;quot; approach &amp;amp;mdash; e.g. preparing their death room immediately upon their arrival, and luring them in via a profile-set lever pull job.  The count won't be popular (at least in your fort) if nobody knows him, unless he's popular by reputation or something.  Angry relatives?  If they show up friendly but ready to tantrum, I draft / lure them into killing rooms; if they're hostile, I deal with them like a siege.  Nobles all being upset by the tax collector means nothing if I've killed all the nobles.  And it's not like I'm going to make tombs for them, either.  Only the law enforcement one looks like an issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::On the other hand, maybe that's the point &amp;amp;mdash; you're penalised if you just randomly kill nobles because you don't like them, but you're also allowed to run a &amp;quot;screw the nobility, we're a free communal fortress&amp;quot; game (or have a &amp;quot;kill the entire current regime, we want a revolution&amp;quot; event) so long as you actively enforce it. &amp;amp;mdash;&amp;amp;nbsp;[[User:Wisq|Wisq]]&amp;amp;nbsp;([[User talk:Wisq|talk]]) 19:02, 31 May 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Another issue that can pop up is killing your Baron/Count/Duke, their spouse will stick around and remain a noble even after the replacement and their spouse has shown up. On one fortress my count had 3 Countess Consorts, one was his wife and the other 2 were leftovers from the previous 2 counts. One Baron happened to be standing under a drawbridge as it came down (don't ask what a drawbridge was doing in his room, lets just say he wasn't going to get that rock crystal item he wanted) and his widow was promoted to Countess Consort when the new Count showed up to replace him a few seasons later. That Count was tending a farm when a squad of gobs beat the living tar out of him and his widow remained a Countess Consort even after the third noble arrived to replace the dead Count. They all still make demands/mandates and still require rooms/tombs and all that as before. [[User:Lando242|Lando242]] 20:55, 18 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Selling Nobles ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;╔═╦═╗&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt; Unlock doors, assign lever to noble, order lever pulled.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;║ò┼^┼&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt; Wait for noble to stand on cage trap, lock both doors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;╚═╩═╝&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt; Wait for noble to fall asleep, sell caged noble to elves.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry for the crude drawing. My wiki format skills are weak. [[User:Rkyeun|Rkyeun]] 14:36, 20 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Eh... except for the small known bug where trying to haul an occupied cage to the trading depot results in whatever is caged being freed and the empty cage being brought in. But once they fix that bug, maybe. -[[User:Fuzzy|Fuzzy]] 16:30, 20 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I've been trying to sell my dwarves for ages, as a 'clean' approach to dealing with nobles and unwanted immigration.  Sadly, they always seem to die of thirst first.  If I let them out just once to drink, they die of hunger.  Maybe if I let them out twice... but that's a lot of effort.  Better to just let them die, unless they're very popular or something. &amp;amp;mdash;&amp;amp;nbsp;[[User:Wisq|Wisq]]&amp;amp;nbsp;([[User talk:Wisq|talk]]) 19:06, 31 May 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Selling to the Elves? That's too cruel, even for nobles!  Don't you know that the Elves are '''Cannibals!?!'''  --[[User:Arkenstone|Arkenstone]] 12:45 17 August 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::[ENTITY:FOREST]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[CREATURE:ELF]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[ETHIC:EAT_SAPIENT_KILL:ACCEPTABLE]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Actually, they're not cannibals. That would state that they would eat each other if they killed each other. This is only that they'll eat the dead that they kill themselves, and as killing each other in their society is not acceptable they won't eat each other, however, if the Sapient_other tag was set to acceptable they might end up eating each other if they die by any means. [[User:Shardok|Shardok]] 20:16, 17 August 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Well, eating deceased of your own kind is still cannibalism. [[User:Kurokikaze|Kurokikaze]] 11:15, 14 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Category? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would do this myself if I knew how, but perhaps someone should make a noble category, with all the noble related articles (Unfortunate accident, mandate, types of nobles, etc) in it. I think it would be useful. [[User:Spoggerific|Spoggerific]] 20:53, 10 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Nobles Working==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actually, nobles not only gather harvest if you put all dwarves harvest on, but they also help demolishing constructed walls.=--[[User:Stinhad Limarezum|Stinhad Limarezum]] 00:53, 23 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks, I'll add that to [[labor]].--[[User:Maximus|Maximus]] 03:16, 23 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Arrival Requirements Verified==&lt;br /&gt;
Ok, I just had the Baroness, Hammerer, and Tax Collector arrive simultaneously with no other dwarves.  I'm playing with a population cap of 50, and births (plus overflow of last immigration wave) has finally taken me up to exactly 80 dwarves.  Despite the population cap, the Baroness, Tax Collector, and Hammerer arrived by themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;Note that the Baroness Consort has not arrived, presumably because he takes the place of a normal dwarf during the immigration wave and can't be generated in violation of the population cap (whereas the other three can).&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;  nevermind, he just showed up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I should also note that I earlier had the King arrive as a peasant by himself despite being at the population cap.  He also brought no consort nor advisor (although I've never had him arrive as a peasant before, so I don't know if that's normal).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have not seen a philosopher as of yet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As my fortress wealth is past 8 million at this point, I think its safe to say I can rule that out as a cause (having seen them at much lower wealth in default pop cap games).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Squirrelloid|Squirrelloid]] 19:30, 7 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I had the usual five nobles show up once in an immigration wave that took me over 80 dwarves, and promptly killed them, along with most of the immigrants.  I subsequently set my population max to 50.  My current population (minus nobles) is 69, yet those same nobles continue to show up every few seasons, suggesting that once you become a barony (80 pop, initial baron/ess arrival), they'll continue to show up again, regardless of your current status. &amp;amp;mdash;&amp;amp;nbsp;[[User:Wisq|Wisq]]&amp;amp;nbsp;([[User talk:Wisq|talk]]) 19:10, 31 May 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Noble demands==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I currently have a Baroness demanding &amp;quot;item in Dining Room&amp;quot;. Any idea what could satisfy this? I tried a bismuth bronze statue, no luck. [[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 00:24, 5 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: This is a bug. Check # 000491 @ http://www.bay12games.com/dwarves/dev_bugs.html --[[User:Sinergistic|Sinergistic]] 00:47, 5 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Pretentious Arrangements==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thoughts about a lesser's pretentious &amp;lt;whatever&amp;gt; arrangements seem to be a common source of noble unhappiness. (this is especially annoying for me as my mayor has an artifact in her bedroom raising it to Royal and my queen has no list of likes and dislikes, so I can't make her happy just by having the right booze) it would be interesting to know what exactly causes the difference between &amp;quot;upset&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;shattered&amp;quot;, how to avoid it, and good ways to mitigate it's effects. I might have to do some research on my old fort to check this myself. --[[User:Pyrite|Pyrite]] 13:58, 6 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, I suspect that the difference is related to the difference in room value, although I suppose that's stating the obvious. Another obvious solution would be to move the artefact into the higher-ranked Noble's room, assuming that's possible. Otherwise, I suppose the simplest (if not the easiest) way to mitigate its effects is to add as much value as possible to the Queen's room. As well as furniture, you can get surprising results with smoothings, engravings, and building an expensive floor over the engraved one if you have no qualms about exploiting such strangeness.--[[User:Quil|Quil]] 18:07, 6 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I can confirm it's the difference between relative worth.  I kept getting these annoying messages in my count + consort until I stuffed a platinum statue in their rooms.  Obviously, this increased the worth of the room by 12K, easily dominating the 'lesser' quarters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It does require that there be a significant difference; having them at roughly equal worth will cause unhappy thoughts, which was my problem in my most recent fortress.  I just housed all my nobles in the same residential stack as everyone else, adding extra room additions off the main design for offices, dining rooms, etc.  The Count's room was a LITTLE better as his walls happened to be ore-bearing, but it wasn't enough to please him, hence the statue.--[[User:ThunderClaw|ThunderClaw]] 10:04, 7 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Alright, I've put the artefact cabinet back in my mayor's room, and now will proceed to test this principle by making the Queen's rooms incredibly nice. I'm going to start by replacing all her furniture with gold and platinum, and move up from there.--[[User:Pyrite|Pyrite]] 15:49, 7 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::You may have a long way to go.  Artifact furniture can easily be 50 or 60K, whereas the most expensive single piece of furniture I've ever been able to produce is a masterwork platinum statue, which is 12K. --[[User:ThunderClaw|ThunderClaw]] 16:36, 7 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::While you can't order artifacts dumped, you can apparently order them forbidden.  So maybe you could forbid it and then move the creator's quarters elsewhere, leaving the original one vacant.  Or maybe you could make them temporary quarters elsewhere, wait for them to move the artifact, then forbid it and move them back. &amp;amp;mdash;&amp;amp;nbsp;[[User:Wisq|Wisq]]&amp;amp;nbsp;([[User talk:Wisq|talk]]) 19:22, 31 May 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I believe you are misenterpreting the way artifacts, and ownership of artifacts works.--[[User:Zchris13|Zchris13]] 16:12, 15 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Noble upgrade size. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have a count still event though I have 148 dwarves.  Could it be dependant on more than just the 140, or is it different now?   [[User:PierreMonteux|PierreMonteux]] 21:55, 11 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I'm at 188 dwarves still with a count not a duke.  Could there be a dependancy on metal jobs?  Other than melting down the goblin metal, I don't have any metal jobs going. [[User:PierreMonteux|PierreMonteux]] 10:47, 14 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just had a peasant give birth to a baby.  This put my population at 110, and I immediately got a message that my fortress had been made into a county.  So, I will remove the &amp;quot;verify&amp;quot; tags from the count/count consort promotion info.--[[User:Scrotch|Scrotch]] 18:59, 27 May 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm certain that exports are a requirement. Remember that only wealth you have created can count as exports, trading goblin items won't raise the number. If you can't offer it, it doesn't count. I had a fortress with 140+ dwarves that jumped up to a barony from nothing when I started exporting. --[[User:Sensei|Sensei: Last seen somewhere in the Basic Jungle of Terror]] 20:03, 31 May 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Failure to comply ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm surprised this hasn't come up yet, but what happens if you don't give a noble the room he/she requires?  I know they get unhappy thoughts, but is that all?  Will they punish anyone?  Or just start throwing tantrums?  Next useless noble I get is sleeping in the barracks.  On the floor.&lt;br /&gt;
:Unhappy thoughts? I don't think there is any repercusions. --[[User:Zchris13|Zchris13]] 16:26, 12 May 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Unhappy nobles means more mandates, more demands and harsher sentences. --[[User:Sensei|Sensei: Last seen somewhere in the Basic Jungle of Terror]] 20:04, 31 May 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just read this and checked my noble's happiness levels and justice levels, and even though they all seem ecstatic lately I have someone who's being jailed for 64 days, which I think is pretty extreme. I have been fulfilling hardly any of their mandates though, so perhaps jail time is related more to mandates than happiness?[[User:Gnavin|Gnavin]] 14:29, 29 July 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why Nobles Exist: ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nobles exist because Dwarven government is a feudal system; the fortress is just a semi-autonomous local government which must still answer to the King, and here's why:&lt;br /&gt;
::Long ago in the Age of Myth, the King's ancestor was legendary +5 in every military skill and took control of everything, killing all who resisted.  His descendants are now &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;fat, lazy, whoremongering, good for nothing slobs&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; not as &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;cool&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; personally strong as he was, but they still technically own everything, including &amp;quot;your&amp;quot; fortress.  The expedition that went to &amp;quot;colonize the King's land&amp;quot; did so with his permission, &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;usually given while drunk&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;.  When your fortress becomes large enough that it can no longer &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;avoid notice&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; govern itself &amp;quot;properly&amp;quot;, the King sends one of his &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;drinking mates&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; representatives to &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;screw up&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; &amp;quot;manage&amp;quot; the fortress.  The nobles hold the authority of the King, and so there every &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;ridiculous&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;stupid&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;impossible&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; &amp;quot;reasonable&amp;quot; mandate &amp;quot;MUST&amp;quot; be obeyed.  --[[User:Arkenstone|Arkenstone]] 12:37 17 August, 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Nobles: Now usefull ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After long studies and several fortresses I finally found a way to use the nobles. Not as Farmers (that my legendary grower children would be...), but as a indeed valueable accuisition to your fortress.&lt;br /&gt;
The trick is simple. You give them nice houses. Outside, so their windows are not useless. And your nobles will be so grateful for this, that they will discover ambushes and in caes of sieges, they will hold up the attackers, so your military can gather and charge that vile force of darkness!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I could though never test this, because my current fort does not attract any nobles, what seems verry odd to me... (167 dorfs &amp;amp; 582253 wealth) I guess it's because I have barely any underground tiles discovered. (Neither having any artefacts) --[[User:Laranto|Laranto]] 23:24, 8 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: And if the noble in question is the hammerer, he may even kill a few in the process. [[User:Iapetus|Iapetus]] 10:20, 28 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Iapetus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://dwarffortresswiki.org/index.php?title=40d_Talk:Undead&amp;diff=60190</id>
		<title>40d Talk:Undead</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://dwarffortresswiki.org/index.php?title=40d_Talk:Undead&amp;diff=60190"/>
		<updated>2009-12-27T11:56:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Iapetus: /* Zombie Gas Warfare */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Is used to tragedy&amp;quot;? == &lt;br /&gt;
One question: I had two dwarves that were not always occupied hunt small zombies and skeletons (hoary marmots, mountain goat and such). Apart from getting really good at wrestling, they both seemed to gain &amp;quot;Is used to tragedy&amp;quot; as a character trait. Can anyone confirm that? -- [[User:qwertyu|qwertyu]] 12:34, 9 March 2008 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That always happens regardless of what they are killing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Pitting problems==&lt;br /&gt;
Should we include the fact that attempting to pit undead animals of any kind will result in them attacking the moment they are released, regardless of how close they are to the pit. (They can be right next to it but still attack the pit-ter once they are out of the cages)&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Umiman|Umiman]] 07:39, 29 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I believe we should put it in as a warning to those who attempt to put captured undead in pits.&lt;br /&gt;
:--Rickola&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Should it be mentioned that the Undead versions are much more tougher than 'normal' creatures, once I had an entire fortress wiped out by a single Undead Racoon. --[[User:Hoborobo|Hoborobo]] 06:47, 10 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think zombies are a lot harder than skeletons.  Maybe undead horses are just absurdly hard anyway, but I put all seven of my starting dwarves on a single zombie horse.  Sure, they were untrained and unarmored and were wrestling it to death (except for the miners), but all seven dwarves went from untrained in wrestling to novice wrestlers, became tired/exhausted, AND two dwarves died and three got yellow/red injuries, before that single zombie horse went down.  Then the other four zombie horses wandered in...  Skeletons seem to be a lot easier to kill. --[[User:Sowelu|Sowelu]] 04:15, 22 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Though zombies are easy to run away from.  My dwarves sidestep zombies whenever they see them (which is often, on my current map), but skeletons would corner them.  Zombies are, however, famously difficult to kill by wrestling.  Use an axe or sword.--[[User:Maximus|Maximus]] 16:25, 22 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Zombies are utterly impossible to kill with wrestling. The only wrestling move that can kill at all is strangling, and zombies don't breathe or bleed. Dwarves set to wrestle undead will only ever destroy them with punches. If you're heading into an evil biome, I'd recommend bringing a well-armed macedwarf! That'll teach 'em to stay dead, pretty darn quick. Swords aren't so good, spears and picks even worse, though axes will do okay. In a pinch, at least make your dwarves shields to bash with. It's a matter of raw damage. --[[User:Navian|Navian]] 17:27, 22 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::(It's not true that strangling is the &amp;quot;only&amp;quot; kill move - wrestling also includes punches, and a lucky punch can damage the throat or an organ.  Not relevant here, but just saying for accuracy.)--[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 06:11, 28 September 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Skeleton Corpse ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have a Skeleton Horse Corpses. That's not normal, right? It appears to have fallen several levels into a river. Adjacent to it (well... adjacent if you ignore the z-difference) are bridge squares and weapon traps. --[[User:Groveller|Groveller]] 11:55, 23 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I saw [http://www.bay12games.com/forum/index.php?topic=22793.0 this report] a while ago on the bugs board. May be worth resurrecting it (especially if you can supply saves)? --[[User:Raumkraut|Raumkraut]] 14:21, 23 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Hmm, just noticed it wasn't on the bugs board, but on the gameplay questions board. May be worth starting a thread on the bugs board then? --[[User:Raumkraut|Raumkraut]] 15:49, 23 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Ah, the board. I hadn't even looked at that yet. Anyway, the person you linked to posted in the bugs board too, so I guess this is known. I didn't think of getting a save... --[[User:Groveller|Groveller]] 07:24, 25 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Skeletal creatures ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was told that skeletal creatures would lose their limbs whenever they hit broken status. Is this true?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As another note, if that is true, I have a bug that occured. Under the assumption broken bones = removed bones for the skeletons, one of my hammerdwarves hit a skeletal dragon so hard that its upper body was instantly mangled, skipping the broken (and thusly removed) state entirely.[[User:Milskidasith|Milskidasith]] 17:17, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Assuming the 'sever on break' tag applies to skeletons, it only applies to limbs. You can't 'sever' a torso. --[[User:Navian|Navian]] 17:27, 22 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Undead Megabeasts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could this be elaborated on a bit? I've never seen an undead megabeast in the legends screen. How does this work? How rare is it (absurdly rare, I guess)? [[User:Lastofthelight|Lastofthelight]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I've had a zombie Titan... no idea why it was a zombie but it was the only megabeast i'd seen.  Really, megabeasts are far too rare now that they can be killed off in world gen. --[[User:Squirrelloid|Squirrelloid]] 10:29, 8 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Agreed. Somehow, I've managed to avoid seeing a megabeast entirely as of yet. Zombies and skeletons are hard enough to find; megabeasts are nearly impossible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::To be honest, I'm really hoping Toady hurries up and brings back the undead event that was talked about in [[Core components]]. That is, undead dwarves and pets that died in your fortress would pop through the floor and attack you. Spooky. ~ [[User:Midna|Midna]] 07:10, 1 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I got a skeletal dragon. Disappointingly, it succumbed to a cage trap. I used savescumming to run some experiments, and it seems it's quite hardy but not particularly powerful. The dragon is now sitting in a dragonfire pillbox in my fortress - by the way, it seems that the undead BUILDINGDESTROYER:1 tag overrides BUILDINGDESTROYER:2, so it can be stopped by a raised drawbridge. I tried activating the pillbox and engaging it with my marksdwarves - it took an extremely long time to even begin to return fire, and only ignited one marksdwarf. On the plus side, being skeletal, I'm pretty sure that ranged attacks won't even scratch it - but now it's going to be a glorified fire trap. --[[Special:Contributions/155.69.95.232|155.69.95.232]] 09:34, 19 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Zombie Gas Warfare ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that &amp;quot;live&amp;quot; zombies also spread miasma if they are indoors.  I have seen this on several occasions, but all with zombie fire imps, so I can't actually confirm that it happens with other zombie types.--[[User:Zipdog|Zipdog]] 02:17, 23 April 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not even sure how having undead [[fire imp]]s is even ''possible''. You'd think that a zombie fire imp, for example, would roast itself to the point where it would die.... ~ [[User:Midna|Midna]] 04:27, 9 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: I embarked near a volcano in an evil biome.  I was beset with ''skeletal'' fire imps.  And yes, they do breathe fire! [[User:Iapetus|Iapetus]] 11:56, 27 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Undead Building Destroyer ==&lt;br /&gt;
I have seen evidence that skeletal creatures have building destroyer. Has anyone had any experience with this or more evidence of it happening? Do they also trapavoid? If undead creatures do destroy buildings normally, it should be on the page, yes? -- [[User:CultOfTheRaven|CultOfTheRaven]] 18:39, 7 May 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I believe that undead retain the traits of the base animal -- at least, I've had a skeletal raccoon steal items just like a regular raccoon does. --[[User:Sev|Sev]] 02:27, 21 May 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The animal was a skeletal fox. I'm pretty sure regular foxes can't destroy doors. -- [[User:CultOfTheRaven|CultOfTheRaven]] 05:27, 25 May 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hammer vs Axe ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After getting my 7 starting dwarves torn apart by a pack of skeletal muskox, I'd like to know just in case it happens again: what is more effective against undead, slashing or bludgeoning?  --[[User:Smartmo|Smartmo]] 22:42, 9 May 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think bludgeon, as it has more raw damage while slashing has the advantage of easier bleeding, which is lost against undeads.[[User:Wagawaga|Wagawaga]] 20:36, 29 July 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Axes are very useful against the undead, since their criticals dismember limbs, it isn't uncommon for an axedwarf to cleave off a skeleton or zombies head killing it instantly even at low skill levels. You can test this yourself in adventure mode, using a Mace user and then an axe user to fight several undead encounters in evil zones. The combat system is inherently random, but after 20 or so fights each you'll quickly see some sort relevant data.&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;anonymous edit - &amp;amp; see next section&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Cut apart to kill? ==&lt;br /&gt;
 Undead can ~only~ be destroyed after losing thier Head, Upper Body, or Lower Body. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;Even after having lost all of their limbs they'll still be quite &amp;quot;alive&amp;quot;, so to speak.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was an anonymous (IP only) post, with this as an editors comment:&lt;br /&gt;
 Tested this information while leveling an adverturer to legendary in almost&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; exclusively undead encounters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm removing it for now, at least until someone with a User name shows up to discuss it. Verification is needed before an absolute statement like this is made. Same in fortress mode? ''All'' undead?! Some of the above posts suggest that a hammer is a fine weapon for its brute damage potential, with or without smashing an undead into bits.  --[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 06:11, 28 September 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Depletion ==&lt;br /&gt;
Does the local population of undead deplete like normal wild animals? --[[User:Bouchart|Bouchart]] 23:38, 17 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tameability? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was not able to find any information on taming the undead in the Tame or Pet articles, so I thought I'd bring it up here. Is it at all possible to tame zombie or skeletal creatures? Because I'd certainly love to have a bunch of skeletal giant eagles floating around my fortress as an alternative to bowling them over with my military every time one shows up. The goats and marmots... eh, not so much. [[Special:Contributions/24.22.239.156|24.22.239.156]] 03:04, 2 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I believe undead creatures are inherently hostile toward all non-undead creatures - using Dwarf Companion to make a tame animal undead makes it attack everyone. --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 04:01, 2 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Iapetus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://dwarffortresswiki.org/index.php?title=40d_Talk:Carp&amp;diff=9988</id>
		<title>40d Talk:Carp</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://dwarffortresswiki.org/index.php?title=40d_Talk:Carp&amp;diff=9988"/>
		<updated>2009-08-26T22:00:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Iapetus: /* E-Z */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==King of the Animals?==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Unicorn|There is another contender for the position of King of the Animals, and this one is land-based.]] --[[User:BDR|BDR]] 14:42, 31 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hmm, what about the other fish? sea lampreys? pike? etc? what about them?  Do they just get shunted, and their named champions brushed aside?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I was going to propose the eagles that seem untargetable as they fly in, grab a dwarf, then drop him from a dizzying height whereupon he spats into chunks on the ground.--[[User:Draco18s|Draco18s]] 03:45, 3 November 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, until Toady lets carp and elephants fight each other to settle this once and for all, perhaps carp should be King of the Sea and elephants King of the Land. Eagles can have King of the Air.--[[User:Xazak|Xazak]] 19:53, 3 November 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Hmm, wonder if you can have those eagles tamed.  Dwarven air force anyone? --[[User:Frostedfire|frostedfire]]  10:02, 9 November 2007 (AEDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::All the other types of hostile fish (e.g. longnose gar, pike, etc) are just as dangerous as carp, or were the last time I had a fort on a river infested by them (it was a &amp;quot;major river&amp;quot; which was only 4 or 5 tiles wide, had about 3 different kinds of hostile fish, and no carp). --[[User:SL|SL]] 12:06, 29 July 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Solen &amp;gt; carp. Who'd win--a fish, or [http://uo.stratics.com/hunters/Pics/transpar/fireantwarrior.gif this]? ~ [[User:Midna|Midna]] 13:18, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biome/habitat==&lt;br /&gt;
It might be worth noting somewhere that you only seem to get &amp;quot;dangerous&amp;quot; fish if you have an actual river (or coastline?).  If you only have a brook and murky pools, you get our old friends turtles and salmon who never attack or scare anyone.  From what I can tell, salmon, turtles, and char seem to be classified as vermin, not creatures, so they don't freak out the dwarfs.  The aquifer seems safe too, though that may depend on what other water sources are nearby.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can anyone confirm or refute? -- [[User:Angela Christine|Angela Christine]] 19:32, 9 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::From what I've seen, this is correct.  While starting and abandoning several fortresses trying to get the handle of making machines and other devious devices, 5 out of 5 fortresses started next to brooks generated no dangerous fish, while 3 of the 4 started next to major rivers and 2 out of 2 started on the coast had my poor dwarves molested by those vile things.  --[[User:TheUbie|TheUbie]] 01:57, 18 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Brooks cannot contain fish because they don't exist on two z-levels, at least that's what I've seen. No fish. --[[User:Vanan|Vanan]] 00:52, 26 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Brooks exist on z-levels the same way rivers do, however brook tiles are filled with rock which means no fish can be in them (and is why dwarves can walk on them). Channeling a brook so it shows 'real' water will cause it to occasionally get fish like all other pools of water, however large fish such as carp never seem to migrate onto the map so you won't get any of them, just the small 'vermin' fish. --[[User:BurnedToast|BurnedToast]] 00:14, 5 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Brooks don't have &amp;quot;river&amp;quot; biome. Creatures (vermin included) are generated in biomes. That's why no goats spawn in your fortress, but olms do, if you have corridor near cave river. If you flooded entire river with magma, and then refilled it with water carp would probably respawn. --[[User:Someone-else|Someone-else]] 17:25, 9 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: Almost all fish do not scare dwarves, but undead versions do. [[User:Hoborobo|Hoborobo]] 07:26, 10 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Carp symbols ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was only curious, since the wiki article lacked a picture, and me and some others would like to know, what does the carp look like in game. Thank you for the help beforehand.&lt;br /&gt;
:Please do sign your edits with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;. At any rate, the fish icon is best described as such: three quarters of an infinity sign. Plain meat has the same symbol. --[[User:GreyMario|GreyMario]] 15:01, 2 April 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'd say it looks like an alpha sign. Almost all fishes are blue-colored because they count as underwater. --[[User:Someone-else|Someone-else]] 17:25, 9 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Salmon are pink though [[User:Hoborobo|Hoborobo]] 06:44, 10 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Butchering? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has anyone managed to butcher a carp, and if so what do you get from it? --[[User:GreyMario|GreyMario]] 15:01, 2 April 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I've never managed it, but I've only had carp once. Next time I get them I'll cheat really fast and dam the river to see what I can do with the air-drowned carp afterwards.--[[User:Eurytus|Eurytus]] 21:56, 2 April 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New Version ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the new version, I have had two fortresses right next to a river filled chock full of carp, and have yet to see a dwarf even get a scrape from one. Have they been toned down to more 'realistic' strength, or have I been obscenely lucky? --[[User:Mabmoro|Mabmoro]] 10:37, 29 July 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Can you say what version it is? [[User:Hoborobo|Hoborobo]] 06:43, 10 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I dont recall the version number, but so far in v0.28.181.39f, I havent gotten it either. None of the more recent versions have had aggressive carp, unless they were floating skeleton carp.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I also checked the raws- they're the same for damage... maybe its a hardcoded difference?--[[User:Mabmoro|mabmoro]] 12:50, 10 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rest assured, carp and other fish are still most certainly deadly. At least, at the time of the question. I can't confirm yet if 39e and 39f had any serious changes, but 39d still boasts deadly, deadly fish so I would assume the latter versions do as well.&lt;br /&gt;
It's just tricky. They don't always strike, and the dwarf actually has be standing right at the river's edge for the carp to take notice. Fisherdwarves, of course, fill this role quite nicely.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've got a named carp floating in my river that's got about four kills under it's belt, as well as managed to catch and drag in a random mountain goat. That thing is evil incarnate... it won't even fall for my fishkilling trap. --[[User:Lightning4|Lightning4]] 02:10, 11 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I had assorted fish types (gar, pike, lampreys, carp) in the river outside of my fortress. They managed to kill 3-4 dwarves before I could get some marksdwarves to take care of them. I can confirm that fish, carp included, are still aggressive in the latest version (as of this post). [[User:Spoggerific|Spoggerific]] 14:46, 11 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hunters ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can hunters ''kill'' carp? [[User:Random832|Random832]] 12:26, 14 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Depends on if they're close enough to the water to aim at said carp. --[[User:GreyMario|GreyMaria]] 18:54, 14 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Will they take it out of the water to return their kill?  [[User:Gairabad|Gairabad]] 20:37, 15 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::In Adventurer mode, you need to be standing directly on top of an item in order to grab it. Since dwarves will refuse to path through water (except when they're already in it [and ESPECIALLY when they're swimming]), no. --[[User:GreyMario|GreyMaria]] 20:49, 15 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== E-Z ==&lt;br /&gt;
so I just had a novice axedwarf slaughter a pond full of carp in 10 seconds, and then he drowned. I had another pool with a sturgeon, and this guy took 3 dwarves lives before the next killed him. The water than took his life. So why are carp given the honorable title of &amp;quot;king of the sea&amp;quot;? what makes them different from sturgeon and the like? They really aren't that scary, if you know how to deal with them.--[[User:Destor|Destor]] 22:22, 24 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I'd say it's because of the ludicrousness.  Sure, sturgeon are deadly -- deadly as any other toothy carnivore bigger than a bear.  They earned their place in the food chain.  Carp on the other hand are &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;cat-sized goldfish&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt; that suck down dwarven children like unlucky flies.  Pound for pound, carp win. --[[User:Corona688|Corona688]] 20:48, 7 May 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Some carp can get pretty big: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/more_sport/article6737929.ece [[User:Iapetus|Iapetus]] 22:00, 26 August 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
oh, and the guy who got the sturgeon was basically the same as the other, might have had a different attribute or something, but this was a fresh reclaim of a fresh fortress. (that I made to test using gear assemblies and the like, but then flooded it.)--[[User:Destor|Destor]] 22:24, 24 December 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Iapetus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://dwarffortresswiki.org/index.php?title=40d_Talk:Strange_mood&amp;diff=5259</id>
		<title>40d Talk:Strange mood</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://dwarffortresswiki.org/index.php?title=40d_Talk:Strange_mood&amp;diff=5259"/>
		<updated>2009-01-11T00:51:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Iapetus: /* Confusing macabre mood */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Does the new version still have the strange mood? It wouldnt be complete without it!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It still exists, I've had it happen several times now, I went to the archive wiki and copy/pasted the old page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Isnt that why the wiki was nuked? To make sure that no old info lingers? Ill put some &amp;quot;verify&amp;quot; in there, I dont think that the bold text is enough for users to understand that some of this may no longer apply. --[[User:Mizipzor|Mizipzor]] 06:03, 6 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I agree. Although moods themselves don't seem to have been changed in this version, the changes to the stones/ores that they use means that some of the information in this article is no longer true. I'll have a go at cleaning it up when I have the proper time for it, but this wiki definitely needs a 'no copypasting from the archives' rule to avoid screwups like this. If people are going to copypaste old stuff, then it is downright irresponsible of them not to verify the accuracy of the information before committing it to the wiki. --[[User:Morlark|Morlark]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know, I was a huge fan of that little strange aspect of the old one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I need my dwarfs to make more swordfish bone swords, and i still need some glass weapons/armor&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The moods seem to have changed. One of my dwarfs went fey, made a nice hematite mug, and is now a legendary... Engraver. Very wierd, he also had no stoneworking or other craftdwarf skills. But he was a competent mason. This was also my fifth dwarf who took the same craftworkshop, so it's a bit strange. --[[User:Soyweiser|Soyweiser]] 17:36, 6 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Six fey dwarf, all took the craftdwarfshop, now my bowyer took one. Think it might be a bug. Is the 15 artifacts limit still in? --[[User:Soyweiser|Soyweiser]] 14:34, 8 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Whohoo my second legendary engraver made a gold mug. My bowyer became a legendary engraver. --[[User:Soyweiser|Soyweiser]] 14:40, 8 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Scratch all that, one of my woodworkers just used a carpenters shop. --[[User:Soyweiser|Soyweiser]] 07:45, 9 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Have you marked all statements in the article that risks being falsified with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{verify}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;? --[[User:Mizipzor|Mizipzor]] 19:41, 6 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey, I am getting a dwarf who wants &amp;quot;raw...crystal&amp;quot;. Help? -- [[User:Bovinepro|Bovinepro]]&lt;br /&gt;
:Probably wants raw crystal glass. I had a dwarf ask for &amp;quot;raw...green&amp;quot;, they wanted raw green glass. Looks like Toady might have moved the glass demands out of the &amp;quot;rough...color&amp;quot; category. [[User:Iddq?|Iddq?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
About the engravers taking over craftdwarf's shops and becoming legendary engravers afterwards is quite true. I recently got a bunch of immigrants, and the engraver that came with them fell into a strange mood before even crossing the bridge on my river. He took over a craftdwarf's workshop and made a basalt scepter, and now he's legendary level in engraving. So yeah, perfect laboratory conditions, he was 100% engraver when he went into his mood and came out a legendary engraver. --[[User:Zhang5|Zhang5]] 17:07, 12 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems that no craft skill is required.  I just had a peasant go into a strange mood.  His skills were: competent marksdwarf; novice wrestler; novice armor wearer.  He grabbed a craftsdwarf's workshop and 10 items (3xFelsite, Schorls, Tigereyes, Red Beryls, Giant cave swallow leather, Grizzly Bear Leather, Rough harlequin opals and Ash logs -- guess he has expensive taste?) and churned out an idol in relatively short order.  This is my 9th successful mood in this fortress, and I've seen requests for between 3 and 10 items, personally.  Since they seem to be increasing in complexity, I've either hit the item cap, or I'm about to break ten :)  [[User:Doctorlucky|Doctorlucky]] 16:34, 19 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is consistent with older versions.  Moody peasants would become crafters, and 10 items was the cap.  The minimum was 1 item -- generally when constructing a &amp;quot;perfect gem&amp;quot;.--[[User:Maximus|Maximus]] 16:55, 19 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I had a miner go into a strange mood, take over a mason's workshop, and make a something that got him up to legendary miner status. In my current fort, I have had 6 artifacts made, 2 of which were actual moods and 5 of which were possessions (I can add, one of them failed and the dwarf became a babbling wreck). My dwarves love to use only one item: an oak door (1 item), an olivine coffin (2 items), a turtle shell mask (1 item and is my cheapest artifiact at 3600), a diorite amulet (3 items), and a perfect jelly opal (1 item). --[[User:Penguinofhonor|Penguinofhonor]] 18:47, 28 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where to add the info that in my game (.33c) a miner took over a mason's workshop, became legendary miner and then held the artifact in his right hand instead of a pick, which became 'hauled', then droped the pick and then took the pick with his left hand? He can mine after all these. While holding a 667 weight units cabinet in his right hand. --[[User:Another|Another]] 10:07, 1 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I had dwarf Miller, profecienty Grower who had Fey Mood, and he became a  Legendary Mason ....&lt;br /&gt;
Is it normal ? [[user:Feydreva|Feydreva]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of my dwarves has become possessed and is demanding cloth, bones and stone, which I have plenty of. But he refuses to go fetch them. Is there something I'm doing wrong?&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;—Preceding [[template:unsigned|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Patarak|Patarak]] ([[User talk:Patarak|talk]]•[[Special:Contributions/Patarak|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: They want either silk or fiber cloth. Make sure you have both! [[User:Bartavelle|Bartavelle]] 03:40, 21 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aargh!  One of my dwarves went secretive and is demanding a huge list of stuff.  He seems to be demanding two types of stone because the &amp;quot;sketches quarry&amp;quot; message stays on twice as long as the others.  I have (and he has gathered) flint: is there any way to tell what kind of stone he wants? --[[User:Holyfool|Holyfool]] 011:55, 7 March 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I had a Glassmaker that sat around when I had a lot of Magma Glass Furnaces, but then decided to get going when I made a regular Glass Furnace.  Seems like they will only use a specific kind.  Not sure yet if it's random.  Might be they won't take the Magma Glass Furnace in version 38a.  Can anyone verify? --[[User:Afbee|Afbee]] 05:07, 21 February 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: My Glassmaker successfully used Magma Glass Furnace in a fey mood. --[[User:Digger|Digger]] 07:54, 24 February 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: I just had the same problem.  I had a glass maker who wouldn't take over a magma glass furnace.  Since I'm creating a glass fortress and had a mess of glass orders piled up, I thought that might have confused the AI and I built 2 more magma glass furnaces.  No dice, he didn't want them.  After reading this page I decided to create a normal glass furnace.  He snapped it up as soon as it was built. --[[User:Alkyon|Alkyon]] 04:07, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Maximum number of artifacts==&lt;br /&gt;
Well, I just got my umpteenth mood, and it resulted in the 16th successfully created artifact.(33b)  So that 15 cap thing is clearly wrong.  As it happens, this single artifact is worth 754,800, and is an adamantine spear decorated with, among other things, adamantine.  For the record, in case this data is important to someone tabulating number of ingredients, my moods in order created the following objects using the corresponding number of ingredients: (Flute, 4; Mechanism, 4; Spear, 3; Millstone, 6; Ring, 8; Chest, 7; Cape, 7; Ring, 9; Statue, 8; Idol, 10; earring, 8; Buckler, 8; Table, 3; Mechanism, 10; Bracelet, 5; and Spear, 8). [[User:Doctorlucky|Doctorlucky]] 04:54, 27 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do fell/macabre moods still exist? I haven't seen any for quite a few versions. It'd be nice to have that verified.&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;—Preceding [[template:unsigned|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Rabek|Rabek]] ([[User talk:Rabek|talk]]•[[Special:Contributions/Rabek|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== clarification on &amp;quot;trade&amp;quot; skills ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are trade skills all the skills that produce items with some level of quality? Mainly I want to know if dyer is a trade skill. And how does that work with miner? I didn't think miner was a trade skill. Maybe someone who knows more than me could clarify in the wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
I just got my first artifact. It's worth 2400. The dwarf took one log and made a scepter. -[[User:Radtse|Radtse]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't know exactly, we should make a list of the skills we know are not trade skills. I'll start: my brewer/grower once got a strange mood and made a wood item and gained woodcrafting skill. Let's try to only add to the list when we have experienced a moody dwarf with that skill only.--[[User:Valdemar|Valdemar]] 19:36, 27 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm adding Weaver and Furnace Operator to this list, since they're on the wiki. I haven't seen them myself, but I'm assuming someone else has. Knowing that Furnace Operator is a &amp;quot;fey-able&amp;quot; skill will be quite helpful.-[[User:Radtse|Radtse]] 18:28, 29 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Where's cooking fit in? --[[User:KittenyKat|KittenyKat]] 20:09, 6 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
List of non-trade skills:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Brewer]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Grower]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Miller]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wood Cutter]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Skills that may be used and gained by dwarves with no trade skills:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wood crafter]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stone crafter]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Skills that use a different skill(See list above), but give correct skill:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Miner]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Engraver]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Furnace Operator]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Weaver]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::For the record, i can confirm both Furnace Operator and Weaver, since no one else has commented to verify them thus far.  (The weaver actually surprised me when it happened). --[[User:Squirrelloid|Squirrelloid]] 01:43, 29 April 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I can confirm that a Miner will claim a Mason's shop, and produce a stone item, even with no Mason skill at all. It works just like the wiki says. --[[User:Strangething|Strangething]] 23:47, 31 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::And I can confirm that Wood Cutter does not contribute --  I had a Novice Glassmaker/No Prefix Wood Cutter take a glass furnace. [[User:Slitherrr|Slitherrr]] 13:48, 28 July 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== mood condition ==&lt;br /&gt;
The 20 dwarves / no crazy stuff has been found while looking at the binary of v0.27.169.33d, might be different now, but i don't think so. [[User:Bartavelle|Bartavelle]] 15:08, 2 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding the calulations for required maximum existing artifacts (items/200 and dugout/(48*48)) wouldn't it make more sense to either use the squared symbol, or the actual result of that square (which was the original number actually discovered/revealed I believe)? --[[User:N9103|Edward]] 19:17, 28 April 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;su&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;p&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/su&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;p&amp;gt; --[[User:GreyMario|GreyMario]] 21:28, 28 April 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:20 dorf must be still there. I've made low-population fort and I had no mood for ~8 years (from start). I'm sure that I've digged at least 2700 tiles and created at least 300 items. I will test if raising population to 20 will cause moods. I think that 20 dwarf limit should be mentioned even if it's not confirmed. --[[User:Someone-else|Someone-else]] 18:30, 26 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Random Workshop Seizure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just had a gem cutter seize a carpenter's workshop and make a perfect gem; upon completion I had a worthless Legendary dwarf and a new jeweler's workshop, so I guess that's still in from the previous version. I've removed the verify in the article. [[User:Tacroy|Tacroy]] 16:51, 9 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:nonsense.  Should be a bigger chance of making ZOMG high-quality gem crafts now ;) --[[User:Frostedfire|Frostedfire]] 07:35, 18 February 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::More to the point, if you don't like the profession your dwarf has Legendary in...draft for the stats! --[[User:Alfador|Alfador]] 12:16, 18 February 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== forbidden items ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do moody dwarfs use forbidden items? Will they demand forbid items? [[User:Diabl0658|Diabl0658]] 02:07, 21 February 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't know whether moody dwarves will use forbidden items (my guess would be they won't). But they don't choose the demands based on what is on the map, they can and do demand things you don't have. So it's safe to assume forbidding doesn't prevent dwarves from demanding the forbidden kind of item. --[[User:BahamutZERO|BahamutZERO]] 16:31, 13 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Forbidden items are not used. Similarly, if your mooder slipped in e.g. an iron bar when you wanted him to use a platinum bar, you can forbid AND dump the item to stop him from using it. --[[User:GreyMario|GreyMaria]] 16:35, 13 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Impossible Requests? ==&lt;br /&gt;
Will dwarves try to use items that you just don't have access to? I had a dwarf asking for silk when I haven't imported any and I'm pretty sure there isn't a giant spider anywhere. Also asking for &amp;quot;rocks&amp;quot; when I have mined at least one of each type of rock that is visible (requiring rocks from unmined areas seem pretty harsh). Also a request for &amp;quot;metal bars&amp;quot; when I have smeltered at least one of each ore I have found and made at least one of each possible alloy. [[User:Yvain|Yvain]] 23:27, 26 February 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, impossible stuff is all my dwarves ever want.  :-P  Right now mine appears to want stone I don't have, and no traders have come by with any stone....  So my guys are frantically mining in various directions....  [[User:Holyfool|Holyfool]] 13:59, 7 March 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As far as i can tell they never request anything it is truly impossible for you to get.  Available by trade seems to imply possible for the game engine though.  Too bad if its the start of winter (which is when all my moods which require things I don't have and can't produce happen, of course).  But if there's no sand on your map at all you will not be asked for glass, since you can't trade for sand.  (If there's 5 tiles of sand under that underground lake you haven't found yet... sucks to be you - my first fortress lost 3 dwarves to this).  So yes, requiring things present on the map that you haven't found yet appears to be possible and routine. --[[User:Squirrelloid|Squirrelloid]] 01:48, 29 April 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procastinator! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just had a moody dwarf demand bones, wood, rocks, and cloth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He got the rocks okay, and then did nothing for ages. Then, as soon as the fire imp corpse rotted away, he ran down and got the bones, then ran over to my wood stockpile and got a piece of wood...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do they need to get their ingredients in order now?--[[User:Shadow archmagi|Shadow archmagi]] 06:28, 29 February 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:i think so, not that it  matters, he wont start unless he has ALL the ingridents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== gems ==&lt;br /&gt;
My moody dwarf asked for 2 kinds of rough gems, but i had cut all rough ones at that point. So i &amp;quot;printed out&amp;quot; all layers and started checking for leftover gems in the walls. Guess what, he picked the first 2 kinds i mined. So either&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* random/pure luck (don't think so)&lt;br /&gt;
* they only ask what they &amp;quot;see&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* they only ask what is somehow on the map&lt;br /&gt;
* or they might even adapt somewhat to availability, but i doubt that. --[[User:Koltom|Koltom]] 15:59, 28 March 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I believe, but don't know for sure, that sometimes they want specific items and sometimes they just want anything in a category of items, such as any rough gems in this case. It used to work that way in the 2d version, didn't it? --[[User:BahamutZERO|BahamutZERO]] 12:23, 14 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Confirming behaviour that BahamutZERO sees. Dwarves will '''always''' grab the closest object that falls under the category unless he is requesting a specific metal, specific silk, or specific plant fiber cloth. --[[User:GreyMario|GreyMaria]] 14:25, 14 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Just standing around? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have a dwarf who was possessed, but won't leave the main hall. He's also a novice in everything, but to be safe I've already cleared the shops. It's winter of my first year, but somehow I've already had 2 waves of immigrants. Back to the point, I'm afraid he's going to wait out the mood and go berserk. Help?&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Ilmmad|Ilmmad]] 20:00, 6 March 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, make sure u ve got one workshop of every possible kind available - there are however quite a few u dont need to build, its covered in the article. Check for locked doors or otherwise blocked access (bridges, channels, statues..) Dont forget furnaces, glass and magma. Check with 'q' if all workshops are completely build. If it doesnt help consider building workshops not related to his skills, or more &amp;quot;exotic&amp;quot; ones, like Ashery or Alchemist. No one can guarantee that Toady didnt have some new fun ideas ;) --[[User:Koltom|Koltom]] 22:59, 6 March 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== stark raving suicide ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My mechanic wanted silk cloth, which I didn't have, and eventually gone insane (&amp;quot;stark raving mad&amp;quot; to be precise).&lt;br /&gt;
Seconds after that I had message that he died in heat (I had artificial magma pool nearby).&lt;br /&gt;
He probably jumped into the pool like in melancholy. Main article states that only melancholic dwarves kill themselves in such way.&lt;br /&gt;
Could anyone confirm that mad ones do that too, and this wasn't just an accident/bug? [[User:Someone-else|Someone-else]] 16:59, 19 April 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps it ''was'' an accident -- I seem to recall that &amp;quot;stark raving mad&amp;quot; ones wander around at random. Perhaps it wandered into the lava. [[User:Anydwarf|Anydwarf]] 18:30, 19 April 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It was an accident, the stark raving mad ones wander around aimlessly, regardless of Z- levels. --[[User:Hoborobo|Hoborobo]] 12:53, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glassmaker with no glass ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I had an immigrant glassworker get a mood, seize a glass workshop, and created an artifact made entirely of gemstones. No glass involved or asked for. (No sand on the map, anyway.) He turned into a Legendary Glassworker, despite having never made a glass anything.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rewrite ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think I got most of the old information and then some into the new article.  Please make any necessary modifications. --[[User:Marble Dice|Marble Dice]] 01:22, 10 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Silk Cloth ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I had a dwarf demand silk cloth, but he refused to use my giant cave spider silk cloth. I didn't have any regular cave spider silk cloth. To verify that the silk was the problem, I used Companion to change the silk demand to any stone, and he immediately collected the rest of the materials and constructed the artifact.&lt;br /&gt;
Can anyone else confirm that giant cave spider silk cloth does '''not''' count as silk cloth? --[[User:Doniazade|Doniazade]] 08:55, 13 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:No, I'm pretty sure I can't. I've seen a dwarf grab GCS silk.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Could it be that you had thread and not cloth? --[[User:GreyMario|GreyMaria]] 13:59, 13 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Nope, giant cave spider cloth [3] sorted under cloth on the stock screen. --[[User:Doniazade|Doniazade]] 16:52, 13 May 2008 (EDT) &lt;br /&gt;
Probably they may specifically require GCS silk or specifically require CS silk. &amp;amp;mdash;[[User:Chaos|Chaos]] 14:10, 13 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
I figured it out - the silk was outside and I had accidentally left &amp;quot;Dwarves Stay Inside&amp;quot; on after the latest attack. --[[User:Doniazade|Doniazade]] 08:52, 14 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Engineer taken by secretive mood, and creates... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Evidently engineers who are taken by a secretive mood (&amp;quot;withdraws from society&amp;quot;, in case it's later determined that the descriptor has an effect) will have no problems taking over the mechanic's workshop. And there's only one thing mechanic-shops build - that's right, you heard right, ladies and gentlemen, I present ''Kodor ós: A claystone mechanism''. It's even available for use from the appropriate {{k|b}})uild screens. He decided to make this splendid 86,400o creation while on an eight-mechanism binge in that very same mechanic's workshop. Maybe dwarves choose the workshop they've been in the most often? --[[User:BismuthBismuthBismuth|BismuthBismuthBismuth]] 15:31, 13 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Ah, actually I can confirm I've had a Mechanic create an artifact mechanism as well. Stick some obsidian swords in that baby and you'll be good to go! That should probably go in the main article for skills vs workshops... I would expect siege engineers also have strange moods, but I imagine pump op and siege op fall under the general craftsman catch-all --[[User:Marble Dice|Marble Dice]] 15:45, 13 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'd like to smack BismuthBismuthBismuth with the facts stated in the article.&lt;br /&gt;
      A dwarf will claim a workshop according to their highest applicable skill&lt;br /&gt;
::In this case it was Engineering and therefore your mechanic went to a Mechanic's Workshop. It's the same with the possessed glassmakers. They hit a glassmaker's shop. --[[User:GreyMario|GreyMaria]] 15:49, 13 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'd like to hit GreyMario-Maria, preferably in the upper-body region, with the fact that at the time of my post, the table in the article did not mention mechanics whatsoever. --[[User:BismuthBismuthBismuth|BismuthBismuthBismuth]] 22:26, 13 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Pardon me, but I was not aware that ''mechanics'' worked at a ''mechanic's workshop'', where objects are created that have ''quality mofidiers'' and can thus become ''artifacts''. --[[User:GreyMario|GreyMaria]] 23:28, 13 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Pardon me as well, but it seems that the table in [http://www.dwarffortresswiki.net/index.php?title=Strange_mood&amp;amp;oldid=25231 this particular revision] did not encapsulate this information. '''GreyMario is throwing a tantrum!''' --[[User:BismuthBismuthBismuth|BismuthBismuthBismuth]] 15:22, 14 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Mechanics. Work at a mechanic's workshop. Produce items which have visible quality modifiers. Items with visible quality modifiers are eligible to be artifacts. THEREFORE, mechanics claim mechanic's workshops when they go fey. Seriously, logic sometimes, please? --[[User:GreyMario|GreyMaria]] 15:30, 14 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::That would follow if we knew for certain that the proposition &amp;quot;items with visible quality modifiers are eligible to artifacts&amp;quot; is necessarily true.  We don't.  For instance, siege engine components are &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;not&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; verified as artifact eligible.  Since that isn't a given, it's perfectly reasonable for people to not jump to the conclusion that a job type will create artifacts relevant to it until they see it happen. &amp;amp;mdash;[[User:Chaos|Chaos]] 16:26, 14 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i love the absurd randomness factor with artifacts - you end up with really weird stuff. like grates, and socks. a question pertinent to legendary mechanisms - i got a stupidly valuable one of these as the first legendary item in a new fort and i used it to create a gear assembly in a public dining area in the hopes that it would give dwarves happy thoughts, but after a few years gametime of checking randomly on them nothing particular showed up. any particular use along these lines for legendary mechanisms for something other then simple fortress value? --[[User:FruityBix|FruityBix]] 11:51, 10 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: weapon traps! --[[User:Bartavelle|Bartavelle]] 12:03, 10 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:: FWIW, that might be a more general answer for artifact items... I had a Weaponsmith dwarf go into a strange mood and create a lead warhammer (Yes, there was plenty of steel and iron around, but this dwarf likes lead, I guess). It can't be equipped as a weapon (lead isn't a valid material type normally for constructing weapons) but I can put it into a weapons trap. Which... is basically the only thing I can do with this 65000* artifact... -[[User:Fuzzy|Fuzzy]] 14:37, 10 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Actually, artifact equipment can be used, it just requires a &amp;quot;hero&amp;quot; level dwarf or higher. However, for the nonstandard material weapons and armor you may do well to forbid them so that they're not used. The actual effectiveness of odd material artifacts is supposedly lower than that of decent iron or steel equipment, and artifact equipment cannot be unequipped once a dwarf decides to use it. --[[User:Janus|Janus]] 15:36, 10 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Build your artifact mechanism into a really, really, really wonderful well. --[[User:Corona688|Corona688]] 11:37, 13 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tanner fixed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just had a Tanner claim a leather works, not a tannery. I updated the table. For the record, the dwarf has no skill level in leather working.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wonder if Tanners even claim Tanner's shops?  Tanner's shops just make leather, and leather doesn't have quality modifiers, so you shouldn't be able to  produce an artifact from one, aye?  That information came from an older version of the page, I wonder if it was inaccurate.  Weavers supposed claim Clothier's shops and not Looms, so it would make sense if Tanners were the same way. --[[User:Marble Dice|Marble Dice]] 18:08, 2 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Cooks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can confirm that cooks do not produce artifacts: my Peasant with Dabbling Cook/Brewer/(various social) and nothing else just took over a Craftsdwarf's Workshop. I'm removing the verify tag for cooks in the article. --[[User:Comonad|Comonad]] 16:16, 2 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
mmmm. . . . artifact roast.  [[User:Mirthmanor|Mirthmanor]] 19:12, 4 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Soapers etc. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It stands to reason that soapers, lye makers, and wood burners wouldn't make artifacts. Neither soap, lye, charcoal, nor ash have quality modifiers, and that's all those skills can produce. I'm pretty sure you can't have artifact soap, lye, charcoal, or ash.  --[[User:Tachyon|Tachyon]] 20:26, 11 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: My woodburner just got possessed. He wants a shell and wood. I have the shell but I'm not sure what type of wood he wants. --[[User:Ehertlein|Ehertlein]] 20:18, 22 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Not all demands need to be met ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just had a dwarf taken by a secretive mood and collect a huge variety of things:  4 stone, 1 block, 1 gem, 2 rough gems, bones, a shell, 2 leather.  He was further sketching for more bones, 2 leather, another stone, a log, another shell, and raw green glass.  The only things I didn't have on hand were the shell and the green glass -- dwarves seem to go through their list in order, and get stuck on certain items.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just hoped someone would eat a turtle (50/1678 chance!) and queued a raw green glass.  When the glass was made, he got started, totally ignoring his previous requests for wood, another shell, and the other things. Anyone else have this experience?  [[User:Mirthmanor|Mirthmanor]] 13:28, 13 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think they keep sketching images even after they get the items. Your dwarf already had all of the shells, leather, bones, stones, blocks, and gems he needed. [[User:Curudan|Curudan]] 15:26, 22 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::This is correct. I've had dwarves run out, grab two items, and then sit at the Workshop shouting a need for three items. When the item he was waiting on became available, he ran out, grabbed it, went back in, and started working. So it's pretty evident that they list ALL of the items they want, regardless of how many of them they've already collected. --[[User:Nekojin|Nekojin]] 22:28, 23 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Possession ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've had 14 moods in my current Fortress, 11 of them have been possessions. Am I really unlucky, or is the type of mood weighted? [[User:HeWhoIsPale|HeWhoIsPale]] 09:55, 26 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: As far as I can tell by looking at the game logic, each mood types are as likely to be rolled (except fell of course, which is selected if happiness&amp;lt;rand(128) or something like that). --[[User:Bartavelle|Bartavelle]] 07:56, 3 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:: I had a feeling I was just getting really unlucky, thanks. [[User:HeWhoIsPale|HeWhoIsPale]] 14:34, 3 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Furnace Operator ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apparently furnace operator is no longer a mood skill as of df 28 181 40d. I just had a expert furnace operator take over a Craftdwarf's Workshop and become a legendary stonecrafter. [[User:Otherdwarf|Otherdwarf]] 10:26, 1 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I had one take over a mason's workshop, I would guess that Furnace Operator is treating like Engraver or Miner. I'm kind of disappointed, I was hoping he'd churn out an artifact coke or something.[[User:Gandalf the Dwarf (No, really! Look it up!)|Gandalf the Dwarf (No, really! Look it up!)]] 13:03, 14 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Back when furnace operator was moodable, they'd turn out metal crafts.  But taking over a mason's workshop is surprising.  Occasionally they'll take over a random workshop and convert it into the type they want -- what artifact did the dwarf produce?  And, just to rule out some obvious things, did the dwarf have dabbling skill in mining, masonry, or engraving?--[[User:Maximus|Maximus]] 13:51, 14 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::He went crazy looking for some kind of rough gem, so we'll never know.  It was ''right'' after the dwarf trading caravan left, too, so I really had no chance whatsoever.  I don't know for sure what skills he had, I don't think he had much other than Furnace Operator, Architect, and the social skills though.  I ''might'' have enabled mining, but there was plenty of work for him at the smelter so I don't know for sure.--[[User:Gandalf the Dwarf (No, really! Look it up!)|Gandalf the Dwarf (No, really! Look it up!)]] 15:56, 14 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Chunk Butchery? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well, even though the selection of items for artifacts is totally random, its a bit wierd if a macabre dwarf goes to a butcher's workshop and starts bringing in tons of dwarf CHUNKS! My dwarf just started doing that, should I expect rotting meat (yes, the chunks are already rotten)? - 09:57, 30 October 2008 Stinhad Limarezum &lt;br /&gt;
: ^_^ &amp;quot;This is a delicious meat pie. All craftsdwarfship is of the highest quality. On the item is an image of a dwarf and dwarves in rotting dwarf chunks. The dwarf is baking the other dwarves into meat pies. The artwork relates to the rise of the dwarf butcher Sweeney Todd as the cook of The Fleet Street in 78&amp;quot; -[[User:Fuzzy|Fuzzy]] 11:11, 30 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, ''do'' post the description of the artifact when the dwarf completes it.  (&amp;quot;Menaces with spikes of dwarf chunk?&amp;quot;  I'd be intimidated for sure.)--[[User:Maximus|Maximus]] 13:18, 30 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What Workshop? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;any&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt; way to discover what workshop a dwarf in a secretive mood requires?  I had nearly everything.  I built a siege workshop and a bowery before I ran out of ideas and he went beserk. --[[User:Corona688|Corona688]] 10:55, 3 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You have to look at what skills he has first and rule out the obvious.  If he has no mood-able skills then it's going to be a craftsdwarf's workshop.  If you have hit magma and he wants a forge or glass furnace, he will insist on the magma version of that workshop.  Finally, maybe one of your existing workshops was inaccessible or you accidentally [[forbid]] it at some point.  If none of that works, I'm out of ideas too.--[[User:Maximus|Maximus]] 13:01, 3 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I have a functioning magma glass furnace and I had to build a normal glass furnace when my glass maker became secretive. [[User:HeWhoIsPale|HeWhoIsPale]] 14:23, 11 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Same here, in fact I had 2 moody glass making dwarves refuse to use anything but a normal glass furnace when there were 5 fully functional magma glass furnaces in the same fort. (sorry, almost forgot to sign) --[[User:Alkyon|Alkyon]] 14:27, 11 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Ditto.  A glassmaker got possessed and refused to use my magma glass furnace.  I had to build a regular one. --[[User:Schwern|Schwern]] 19:33, 27 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ah.  In older versions, they'd insist on a magma workshop, when possible.  Do they now insist on using a regular workshop, or has anyone seen a moody dwarf use a magma workshop in recent versions?--[[User:Maximus|Maximus]] 14:34, 11 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I believe my metalsmith is waiting for my magma forge to come on line, I have a standard forge built, but that isn't doing anything for him. Does anyone know what effect fluctuating power will have on the strange mood? Edit: If a claimed workshop looses power for even a millisecond, the mood fails. [[User:HeWhoIsPale|HeWhoIsPale]] 12:02, 18 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Possessed Child ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have a child that has become possessed and taken over one of my craft workshops (of course).  He is muttering the following: rough color, leather skin, bone yes, stone rock, cloth thread, blocks bricks, and a shell.  He has already acquired the following: turtle bones, donkey bones [4], microcline blocks, turtle shell, rough pink garnets, dog leather, carp leather, and hematite.  I have plenty of all the things that he's already gathered, so I'm assuming that he doesn't need anymore of those items.  That leaves the thread.  I have turned off my auto-loom a while ago so that I would keep the thread around for artifacts.  I currently have plenty of plant thread (4 pig tail and 14 rope reed) and enough spider silk (5).  What I don't have is giant spider silk.  I have confirmed that the child has access to all these items, including the thread which I have piles next to his workshop.  Still he doesn't start construction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can any help?  Is there a difference for artifact creation between regular cave spider silk and giant cave spider silk?  ---[[User:Frewfrux|Frewfrux]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Do you have both silk and plant cloth available?  (Not just thread.)  And do you see any specific cloth preferences in his thoughts and preferences screen?--[[User:Maximus|Maximus]] 01:32, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Argh.  I bet that's it.  No silk cloth, just thread.  I have had guys go crazy for lack of thread before, so I never make silk cloth, just kept the thread.  Oh well, the child is now melancholy.  I can re-load and see what would happen if I make the thread into cloth.  Maybe I'll test that out.  ---[[User:Frewfrux|Frewfrux]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Wouldn't you be able to solve this problem by only weaving dyed thread? Then you'll always have some thread waiting to be dyed. --[[User:RomeoFalling|RomeoFalling]] 03:04, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::You could also leave high quality, expensive materials lying around Forbidden, and only Claim them when someone's trying to make an artifact. --[[User:Navian|Navian]] 15:07, 11 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Getting More Strange Moods ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the article, the number of artifacts is limited by &amp;quot;The number of items created divided by 200.&amp;quot;  This indicates that making bolts (5 for each bone or 25 for each log) or brewing (5 units of drink for each unit of plant brewed) are efficient ways to encourage strange moods.  Does that sound accurate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It also states that the number of revealed subterranean tiles is a limit.  Does that mean an area like a chasm, where many tiles are revealed to start with, will produce more strange moods?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, does anyone know whether the division rounds up or down?  [[User:Gairabad|Gairabad]] 22:24, 16 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'd be willing to bet all stacks count as only one &amp;quot;item&amp;quot; for this kind of calculation.  200 sounds like a paltry number, however.  If rocks are counted as items, most fortresses have thousands of them in just a few years.  The other number is what is most significant (I wonder where the heck it comes from?)  I've had four miners digging non-stop for about 10 years now, and my stocks menu says I have 70,000 stones.  Allowing for underground soil tiles (which don't produce stone) and stone/ore consumed by industry, each miner can probably clear about 2,000 tiles a year: one artifact.  I have 21 artifacts in my fortress now (and two failed moods early on), so if that rate is indicative, I'd say you want to employ three or more miners non-stop to maximize your chances.--[[User:Maximus|Maximus]] 00:09, 17 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The guy who wrote [http://www.dwarffortresswiki.net/index.php/Stone_management#Block_Stockpile this] doesn't seem to think that stones count as created items.  Also, &amp;quot;revealed tiles&amp;quot; is ambiguous.  For example, [http://www.dwarffortresswiki.net/index.php/Exploratory_mining#Mine_shafts this] method is very good at showing you what's inside of a tile without actually mining it out.  Do you suppose that seeing whats inside is enough?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Where do you think these numbers came from anyway?  I'm gonna take a look through the edit history and try to track them down.  [[User:Gairabad|Gairabad]] 00:15, 17 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::They came during [http://www.dwarffortresswiki.net/index.php?title=Strange_mood&amp;amp;diff=25038&amp;amp;oldid=24936 this edit].  They're so specific I've got to think the author did some poking around with a disassembler.  Again, though, 200 is such a paltry number.  If underground &amp;quot;open space&amp;quot; counts, then discovering a chasm, bottomless pit, or magma pipe should many thousands thousands of revealed tiles.  If underground floor tiles are needed, you'll have to mine most of them out yourself.--[[User:Maximus|Maximus]] 00:34, 17 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I had a chat with [[User:GreyMario|GreyMario]] over at his talk page, since he edited the page around the time the changes were made.  He seemed fairly certain that all you had to do to &amp;quot;reveal&amp;quot; a tile was to have a passable square next to it, so I edited the article to reflect that.  He did not, however, know anything about how bolts or stones would affect things.  Right now my hopes are on [[User:Marble_Dice|Marble Dice]], whom I believe made the actual addition.  I'm not sure if he's a very active user though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::By the way, the reason I'm doing all this is that I'm considering optimizing a fortress for strange moods: have '''lots''' of dwarves with only &amp;quot;dabbling&amp;quot; in a single strange mood skill to gain maximum benefit from the moods.  Any ideas for fortress strategies that will go well with this?  [[User:Gairabad|Gairabad]] 02:44, 17 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I saw the conversation -- I keep my eye on [[Special:Recentchanges]].  What he says about &amp;quot;reveal&amp;quot; is correct, as far as I know.  I still wonder about &amp;quot;open space&amp;quot; tiles.  If they count as revealed, all you really need to do is find a chasm/pit/magma pipe and you'll be in moods for years to come.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I've done the dabbling strategy in the past.  It's best to emphasize just a few skills you really really want that are otherwise hard to train due to limited materials -- armorsmith, weaponsmith, bone carver, leatherworker, carpenter, etc.  It works fine with any fortress strategy.--[[User:Maximus|Maximus]] 04:30, 17 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Two missing labors ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strand Extractor and Blacksmith don't currently appear in either the Causes Moods category or the Doesn't Cause Moods category.  I put Strand Extractor in Doesn't Cause Moods and the Blacksmith in Causes Moods; feel free to correct me if you think I'm wrong.  [[User:Gairabad|Gairabad]] 19:59, 18 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I can confirm that blacksmith is moodable, I've got a nice steel chest to show for it.  It stands to reason that strand extractor isn't moodable, but we don't know for sure -- I've slapped a verify on it.--[[User:Maximus|Maximus]] 21:01, 18 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Order of stuff ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm wondering if dwarves always claim items in a certain order.  For example, when a dwarf wants three pieces of wood he always wants them back-to-back, never wood gem wood bone wood.  So are types ALWAYS in a certain order?  My current moody dwarf wanted two bars of metal, then spider silk cloth, then ash logs, then bones, then a rough gem, then a shell.  Knowing the order might help you guess what the dwarf wants next if he doesn't need to wait for anything (and thus tell you what he wants).  This might be useful for micromanaging forbidding stuff to make sure your dwarf gets the highest value things available. --[[User:Sowelu|Sowelu]] 23:19, 26 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;This is actually well-defined in the article, if you'd bothered to look close enough. Dwarves will gather items in the order they scream their demands in.&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; It's unknown. I think there's no real order, just similar things end up grouped together. :V --[[User:GreyMario|GreyMaria]] 23:32, 26 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::fail.  Uh, I mean, as soon as anyone else sees a strange mood, it can either be disproven, or we can start putting some data together immediately and be done pretty quick.  I saw:  Metal Bars, Silk Cloth, Wood, Bones, Rough Gem, Shell.  If anyone sees bones before wood or something, that means there's no guaranteed order.  But no harm done.  :) --[[User:Sowelu|Sowelu]] 23:36, 26 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's simpler than that. Items have a certain number of slots for improvements, and for artifacts the first improvement slot is always filled by the base material of the item. Then the rest are filled in order, with whatever is a valid candidate for that slot (which is probably 'anything that's anything' in every case, though I'm not absolutely sure.) So, there isn't any explicit sorting because it has to be in order.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::If you fill an item's slots with ordinary decoration, which is easiest to do by encrusting a wide variety of gems on a piece of furniture or the like, you'll see what I mean. Maybe. --[[User:Navian|Navian]] 23:40, 26 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah!  So you're saying that instead of generating a list of ingredients, it first plans out the artifact itself, saying &amp;quot;This one is a chest, it has hanging rings and an image, first let's get a material for the chest, then a material for the hanging rings, then a material for the image&amp;quot;?  That makes a ton of sense, and answers my question.  Thanks! --[[User:Sowelu|Sowelu]] 23:47, 26 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Well, I know it doesn't do that, because if you close the game and reopen it, you can get different items... With my elf game, I had one artifact that came out as either a thong, a left mitten, or a rope on five tries. But it's roughly the same idea, even with the details randomized upon creation. --[[User:Navian|Navian]] 00:05, 27 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fell Mood Demands ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It looks like when a brooding dwarf sits in the tanner's shop and says he needs &amp;quot;Things...&amp;quot; what he's looking for is vermin remains.  Other demands are like in Fey moods. --[[User:Sev|Sev]] 22:24, 3 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Confusing macabre mood ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My mayor just entered one, while 'quite content', claimed a smelter, waited for a bit, until the parts appeared (the vermin must have died). He then created a roach rock chitin bracelet, and gained the carpenter skill. Am I missing something here? Smelter, rock and carpenter don't seem to mix well... Note: The only skills were proficient cook and fish cleaner, with some dabbling and noice social.--[[User:Finbeer|Finbeer]] 13:03, 6 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Carpenter?  Or wood crafter?  Claiming a smelter isn't out of the question: they sometimes grab a random workshop and turn it into the one they want (is it still a smelter?).  And what is roach rock?  Give the actual description of the artifact.--[[User:Maximus|Maximus]] 19:14, 6 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Carpenter. It's still a smelter, yes.  &amp;quot;This is a large roach chitin bracelet. All craftsdwaftship is of the highest quality. It is encircled with bands of large roach  chitin and dwarf bone. This object menaces with spikes of rat leather.&amp;quot;--[[User:Finbeer|Finbeer]] 15:32, 7 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Hmm.  Post that one on the forums, find out if it's an actual bug.  Does sound pretty nonstandard.--[[User:Maximus|Maximus]] 22:50, 7 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::  :-D Pretty sure that a roach is an actual bug. -[[User:Fuzzy|Fuzzy]] 09:00, 8 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::D'oh.--[[User:Maximus|Maximus]] 22:56, 8 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I did have two very close together, but I am certain that neither had any carpenter skill, and the smelter was claimed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I've just had a similar occurance.  Immediately after a goblin ambush (that killed 5 of my soldiers and caused major unhappiness in many dwarves), one dwarf that had lost a friend but was just &amp;quot;content&amp;quot; clained a tanner's workshop, grabbed a rhesus macque chunk, and made a rather boring rhesus macaque leather amulet (no embelishments apart from rhesus macaque leather bands).  It did have quite an impressive name though - Gethustongos Nelas Luror, &amp;quot;Harshtainted the Flicker of Cruelties&amp;quot;.  The dwarf herself became a Legendary Weaponsmith, despite having no weaponsmithing skill! (Her highest skill was unlabled armoring). [[User:Iapetus|Iapetus]] 19:47, 10 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rough Gems ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EVERY Fey Mood that has happened for the last 3 years has required Rough Gems!  Argh!  Mining out an entire Z-level has found ONE GEM, which I was idiotic enough to cut the instant I found it.  I do not have Rough Gems.  You cannot buy Rough Gems.  My fortress will die slowly and painfully without Rough Gems.  Cut green glass is good enough when a fey dwarf demands cut gems, why isn't raw green glass good enough when they want rough gems?  Can it be made good enough with a mod?  --[[User:Corona688|Corona688]] 11:19, 13 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Dig down to an igneous intrusive level - they have more gems. --[[User:Squirrelloid|Squirrelloid]] 14:19, 13 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::To mod out gem-demanding fey dwarves, you could remove all gems and then generate a new world. Alternatively, if you don't mind the lack of moods, turn them off in init.txt. Personally, I highly dislike moods, since they just make it that much easier to have abundant so-called &amp;quot;legendary&amp;quot; dwarves, although the random killer effect is quite nice. --[[User:Savok|Savok]] 20:15, 13 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trapper?==&lt;br /&gt;
Has anyone seen a dwarf get trapper experience from a mood?  I've made a couple of artifact animal traps at this point, and all of them were by dwarves without the trapper skill who received xp in skills related to the material.  (ie, my turtle-shell animal trap was made by someone who became a legendary bonecarver therefrom).  I know I made a similar comment on the Trapper talk page.  From the other end, I'm sure I've had immigrant trappers get moods before and have never seen a legendary trapper, although I don't recall specifically enough to be certain they had moods.  But I've seen zero evidence that Trapper is actually a moodable skill.  --[[User:Squirrelloid|Squirrelloid]] 16:00, 15 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Craftdwarf's Workshop==&lt;br /&gt;
I just had a lye maker take over a metalsmith's forge and turn out a bracelet; now he's a legendary metalcrafter.  I think that &amp;quot;Dwarves with only the following skills will construct their artifact at a craftsdwarf's workshop...&amp;quot; might be too constrictive, and that such dwarves could seize any craftdwarf-related workshop (including forges and carpenter's shops), not just a craftdwarf's workshop.  Anyone else observed this behavior? --[[User:Wingus|Wingus]] 09:55, 22 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You're certain that the dwarf in question had no experience in any other tasks? --[[User:N9103|Edward]] 11:19, 22 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, the lyemaker had no other (non-social) skills.  He was a recent immigrant I was using as a hauler. --[[User:Wingus|Wingus]] 11:35, 22 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There have been quite a few anomalous moods that we haven't documented properly yet.--[[User:Maximus|Maximus]] 14:34, 22 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure this falls here.  Had a Potash Maker refuse every shop I built, I had thought I had a craft shop.  Turns out it was forbidden, I reclaimed it and he claimed it for his mood.  I think this is verified.--[[User:Draco18s|Draco18s]] 15:18, 3 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Time limit of a mood. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do we have a fix on the exact time the player has to satisfy a mood before the dwarf goes insane?  Any clue on whether it's fixed or variable?&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Shurikane|Shurikane]] 12:04, 27 December 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Iapetus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://dwarffortresswiki.org/index.php?title=40d_Talk:Strange_mood&amp;diff=5258</id>
		<title>40d Talk:Strange mood</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://dwarffortresswiki.org/index.php?title=40d_Talk:Strange_mood&amp;diff=5258"/>
		<updated>2009-01-11T00:47:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Iapetus: /* Confusing macabre mood */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Does the new version still have the strange mood? It wouldnt be complete without it!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It still exists, I've had it happen several times now, I went to the archive wiki and copy/pasted the old page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Isnt that why the wiki was nuked? To make sure that no old info lingers? Ill put some &amp;quot;verify&amp;quot; in there, I dont think that the bold text is enough for users to understand that some of this may no longer apply. --[[User:Mizipzor|Mizipzor]] 06:03, 6 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I agree. Although moods themselves don't seem to have been changed in this version, the changes to the stones/ores that they use means that some of the information in this article is no longer true. I'll have a go at cleaning it up when I have the proper time for it, but this wiki definitely needs a 'no copypasting from the archives' rule to avoid screwups like this. If people are going to copypaste old stuff, then it is downright irresponsible of them not to verify the accuracy of the information before committing it to the wiki. --[[User:Morlark|Morlark]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know, I was a huge fan of that little strange aspect of the old one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I need my dwarfs to make more swordfish bone swords, and i still need some glass weapons/armor&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The moods seem to have changed. One of my dwarfs went fey, made a nice hematite mug, and is now a legendary... Engraver. Very wierd, he also had no stoneworking or other craftdwarf skills. But he was a competent mason. This was also my fifth dwarf who took the same craftworkshop, so it's a bit strange. --[[User:Soyweiser|Soyweiser]] 17:36, 6 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Six fey dwarf, all took the craftdwarfshop, now my bowyer took one. Think it might be a bug. Is the 15 artifacts limit still in? --[[User:Soyweiser|Soyweiser]] 14:34, 8 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Whohoo my second legendary engraver made a gold mug. My bowyer became a legendary engraver. --[[User:Soyweiser|Soyweiser]] 14:40, 8 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Scratch all that, one of my woodworkers just used a carpenters shop. --[[User:Soyweiser|Soyweiser]] 07:45, 9 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Have you marked all statements in the article that risks being falsified with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{verify}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;? --[[User:Mizipzor|Mizipzor]] 19:41, 6 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey, I am getting a dwarf who wants &amp;quot;raw...crystal&amp;quot;. Help? -- [[User:Bovinepro|Bovinepro]]&lt;br /&gt;
:Probably wants raw crystal glass. I had a dwarf ask for &amp;quot;raw...green&amp;quot;, they wanted raw green glass. Looks like Toady might have moved the glass demands out of the &amp;quot;rough...color&amp;quot; category. [[User:Iddq?|Iddq?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
About the engravers taking over craftdwarf's shops and becoming legendary engravers afterwards is quite true. I recently got a bunch of immigrants, and the engraver that came with them fell into a strange mood before even crossing the bridge on my river. He took over a craftdwarf's workshop and made a basalt scepter, and now he's legendary level in engraving. So yeah, perfect laboratory conditions, he was 100% engraver when he went into his mood and came out a legendary engraver. --[[User:Zhang5|Zhang5]] 17:07, 12 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems that no craft skill is required.  I just had a peasant go into a strange mood.  His skills were: competent marksdwarf; novice wrestler; novice armor wearer.  He grabbed a craftsdwarf's workshop and 10 items (3xFelsite, Schorls, Tigereyes, Red Beryls, Giant cave swallow leather, Grizzly Bear Leather, Rough harlequin opals and Ash logs -- guess he has expensive taste?) and churned out an idol in relatively short order.  This is my 9th successful mood in this fortress, and I've seen requests for between 3 and 10 items, personally.  Since they seem to be increasing in complexity, I've either hit the item cap, or I'm about to break ten :)  [[User:Doctorlucky|Doctorlucky]] 16:34, 19 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is consistent with older versions.  Moody peasants would become crafters, and 10 items was the cap.  The minimum was 1 item -- generally when constructing a &amp;quot;perfect gem&amp;quot;.--[[User:Maximus|Maximus]] 16:55, 19 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I had a miner go into a strange mood, take over a mason's workshop, and make a something that got him up to legendary miner status. In my current fort, I have had 6 artifacts made, 2 of which were actual moods and 5 of which were possessions (I can add, one of them failed and the dwarf became a babbling wreck). My dwarves love to use only one item: an oak door (1 item), an olivine coffin (2 items), a turtle shell mask (1 item and is my cheapest artifiact at 3600), a diorite amulet (3 items), and a perfect jelly opal (1 item). --[[User:Penguinofhonor|Penguinofhonor]] 18:47, 28 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where to add the info that in my game (.33c) a miner took over a mason's workshop, became legendary miner and then held the artifact in his right hand instead of a pick, which became 'hauled', then droped the pick and then took the pick with his left hand? He can mine after all these. While holding a 667 weight units cabinet in his right hand. --[[User:Another|Another]] 10:07, 1 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I had dwarf Miller, profecienty Grower who had Fey Mood, and he became a  Legendary Mason ....&lt;br /&gt;
Is it normal ? [[user:Feydreva|Feydreva]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of my dwarves has become possessed and is demanding cloth, bones and stone, which I have plenty of. But he refuses to go fetch them. Is there something I'm doing wrong?&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;—Preceding [[template:unsigned|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Patarak|Patarak]] ([[User talk:Patarak|talk]]•[[Special:Contributions/Patarak|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: They want either silk or fiber cloth. Make sure you have both! [[User:Bartavelle|Bartavelle]] 03:40, 21 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aargh!  One of my dwarves went secretive and is demanding a huge list of stuff.  He seems to be demanding two types of stone because the &amp;quot;sketches quarry&amp;quot; message stays on twice as long as the others.  I have (and he has gathered) flint: is there any way to tell what kind of stone he wants? --[[User:Holyfool|Holyfool]] 011:55, 7 March 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I had a Glassmaker that sat around when I had a lot of Magma Glass Furnaces, but then decided to get going when I made a regular Glass Furnace.  Seems like they will only use a specific kind.  Not sure yet if it's random.  Might be they won't take the Magma Glass Furnace in version 38a.  Can anyone verify? --[[User:Afbee|Afbee]] 05:07, 21 February 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: My Glassmaker successfully used Magma Glass Furnace in a fey mood. --[[User:Digger|Digger]] 07:54, 24 February 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: I just had the same problem.  I had a glass maker who wouldn't take over a magma glass furnace.  Since I'm creating a glass fortress and had a mess of glass orders piled up, I thought that might have confused the AI and I built 2 more magma glass furnaces.  No dice, he didn't want them.  After reading this page I decided to create a normal glass furnace.  He snapped it up as soon as it was built. --[[User:Alkyon|Alkyon]] 04:07, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Maximum number of artifacts==&lt;br /&gt;
Well, I just got my umpteenth mood, and it resulted in the 16th successfully created artifact.(33b)  So that 15 cap thing is clearly wrong.  As it happens, this single artifact is worth 754,800, and is an adamantine spear decorated with, among other things, adamantine.  For the record, in case this data is important to someone tabulating number of ingredients, my moods in order created the following objects using the corresponding number of ingredients: (Flute, 4; Mechanism, 4; Spear, 3; Millstone, 6; Ring, 8; Chest, 7; Cape, 7; Ring, 9; Statue, 8; Idol, 10; earring, 8; Buckler, 8; Table, 3; Mechanism, 10; Bracelet, 5; and Spear, 8). [[User:Doctorlucky|Doctorlucky]] 04:54, 27 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do fell/macabre moods still exist? I haven't seen any for quite a few versions. It'd be nice to have that verified.&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;—Preceding [[template:unsigned|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Rabek|Rabek]] ([[User talk:Rabek|talk]]•[[Special:Contributions/Rabek|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== clarification on &amp;quot;trade&amp;quot; skills ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are trade skills all the skills that produce items with some level of quality? Mainly I want to know if dyer is a trade skill. And how does that work with miner? I didn't think miner was a trade skill. Maybe someone who knows more than me could clarify in the wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
I just got my first artifact. It's worth 2400. The dwarf took one log and made a scepter. -[[User:Radtse|Radtse]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't know exactly, we should make a list of the skills we know are not trade skills. I'll start: my brewer/grower once got a strange mood and made a wood item and gained woodcrafting skill. Let's try to only add to the list when we have experienced a moody dwarf with that skill only.--[[User:Valdemar|Valdemar]] 19:36, 27 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm adding Weaver and Furnace Operator to this list, since they're on the wiki. I haven't seen them myself, but I'm assuming someone else has. Knowing that Furnace Operator is a &amp;quot;fey-able&amp;quot; skill will be quite helpful.-[[User:Radtse|Radtse]] 18:28, 29 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Where's cooking fit in? --[[User:KittenyKat|KittenyKat]] 20:09, 6 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
List of non-trade skills:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Brewer]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Grower]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Miller]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wood Cutter]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Skills that may be used and gained by dwarves with no trade skills:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wood crafter]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stone crafter]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Skills that use a different skill(See list above), but give correct skill:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Miner]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Engraver]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Furnace Operator]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Weaver]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::For the record, i can confirm both Furnace Operator and Weaver, since no one else has commented to verify them thus far.  (The weaver actually surprised me when it happened). --[[User:Squirrelloid|Squirrelloid]] 01:43, 29 April 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I can confirm that a Miner will claim a Mason's shop, and produce a stone item, even with no Mason skill at all. It works just like the wiki says. --[[User:Strangething|Strangething]] 23:47, 31 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::And I can confirm that Wood Cutter does not contribute --  I had a Novice Glassmaker/No Prefix Wood Cutter take a glass furnace. [[User:Slitherrr|Slitherrr]] 13:48, 28 July 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== mood condition ==&lt;br /&gt;
The 20 dwarves / no crazy stuff has been found while looking at the binary of v0.27.169.33d, might be different now, but i don't think so. [[User:Bartavelle|Bartavelle]] 15:08, 2 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding the calulations for required maximum existing artifacts (items/200 and dugout/(48*48)) wouldn't it make more sense to either use the squared symbol, or the actual result of that square (which was the original number actually discovered/revealed I believe)? --[[User:N9103|Edward]] 19:17, 28 April 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;su&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;p&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/su&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;p&amp;gt; --[[User:GreyMario|GreyMario]] 21:28, 28 April 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:20 dorf must be still there. I've made low-population fort and I had no mood for ~8 years (from start). I'm sure that I've digged at least 2700 tiles and created at least 300 items. I will test if raising population to 20 will cause moods. I think that 20 dwarf limit should be mentioned even if it's not confirmed. --[[User:Someone-else|Someone-else]] 18:30, 26 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Random Workshop Seizure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just had a gem cutter seize a carpenter's workshop and make a perfect gem; upon completion I had a worthless Legendary dwarf and a new jeweler's workshop, so I guess that's still in from the previous version. I've removed the verify in the article. [[User:Tacroy|Tacroy]] 16:51, 9 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:nonsense.  Should be a bigger chance of making ZOMG high-quality gem crafts now ;) --[[User:Frostedfire|Frostedfire]] 07:35, 18 February 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::More to the point, if you don't like the profession your dwarf has Legendary in...draft for the stats! --[[User:Alfador|Alfador]] 12:16, 18 February 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== forbidden items ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do moody dwarfs use forbidden items? Will they demand forbid items? [[User:Diabl0658|Diabl0658]] 02:07, 21 February 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't know whether moody dwarves will use forbidden items (my guess would be they won't). But they don't choose the demands based on what is on the map, they can and do demand things you don't have. So it's safe to assume forbidding doesn't prevent dwarves from demanding the forbidden kind of item. --[[User:BahamutZERO|BahamutZERO]] 16:31, 13 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Forbidden items are not used. Similarly, if your mooder slipped in e.g. an iron bar when you wanted him to use a platinum bar, you can forbid AND dump the item to stop him from using it. --[[User:GreyMario|GreyMaria]] 16:35, 13 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Impossible Requests? ==&lt;br /&gt;
Will dwarves try to use items that you just don't have access to? I had a dwarf asking for silk when I haven't imported any and I'm pretty sure there isn't a giant spider anywhere. Also asking for &amp;quot;rocks&amp;quot; when I have mined at least one of each type of rock that is visible (requiring rocks from unmined areas seem pretty harsh). Also a request for &amp;quot;metal bars&amp;quot; when I have smeltered at least one of each ore I have found and made at least one of each possible alloy. [[User:Yvain|Yvain]] 23:27, 26 February 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, impossible stuff is all my dwarves ever want.  :-P  Right now mine appears to want stone I don't have, and no traders have come by with any stone....  So my guys are frantically mining in various directions....  [[User:Holyfool|Holyfool]] 13:59, 7 March 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As far as i can tell they never request anything it is truly impossible for you to get.  Available by trade seems to imply possible for the game engine though.  Too bad if its the start of winter (which is when all my moods which require things I don't have and can't produce happen, of course).  But if there's no sand on your map at all you will not be asked for glass, since you can't trade for sand.  (If there's 5 tiles of sand under that underground lake you haven't found yet... sucks to be you - my first fortress lost 3 dwarves to this).  So yes, requiring things present on the map that you haven't found yet appears to be possible and routine. --[[User:Squirrelloid|Squirrelloid]] 01:48, 29 April 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procastinator! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just had a moody dwarf demand bones, wood, rocks, and cloth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He got the rocks okay, and then did nothing for ages. Then, as soon as the fire imp corpse rotted away, he ran down and got the bones, then ran over to my wood stockpile and got a piece of wood...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do they need to get their ingredients in order now?--[[User:Shadow archmagi|Shadow archmagi]] 06:28, 29 February 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:i think so, not that it  matters, he wont start unless he has ALL the ingridents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== gems ==&lt;br /&gt;
My moody dwarf asked for 2 kinds of rough gems, but i had cut all rough ones at that point. So i &amp;quot;printed out&amp;quot; all layers and started checking for leftover gems in the walls. Guess what, he picked the first 2 kinds i mined. So either&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* random/pure luck (don't think so)&lt;br /&gt;
* they only ask what they &amp;quot;see&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* they only ask what is somehow on the map&lt;br /&gt;
* or they might even adapt somewhat to availability, but i doubt that. --[[User:Koltom|Koltom]] 15:59, 28 March 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I believe, but don't know for sure, that sometimes they want specific items and sometimes they just want anything in a category of items, such as any rough gems in this case. It used to work that way in the 2d version, didn't it? --[[User:BahamutZERO|BahamutZERO]] 12:23, 14 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Confirming behaviour that BahamutZERO sees. Dwarves will '''always''' grab the closest object that falls under the category unless he is requesting a specific metal, specific silk, or specific plant fiber cloth. --[[User:GreyMario|GreyMaria]] 14:25, 14 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Just standing around? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have a dwarf who was possessed, but won't leave the main hall. He's also a novice in everything, but to be safe I've already cleared the shops. It's winter of my first year, but somehow I've already had 2 waves of immigrants. Back to the point, I'm afraid he's going to wait out the mood and go berserk. Help?&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Ilmmad|Ilmmad]] 20:00, 6 March 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, make sure u ve got one workshop of every possible kind available - there are however quite a few u dont need to build, its covered in the article. Check for locked doors or otherwise blocked access (bridges, channels, statues..) Dont forget furnaces, glass and magma. Check with 'q' if all workshops are completely build. If it doesnt help consider building workshops not related to his skills, or more &amp;quot;exotic&amp;quot; ones, like Ashery or Alchemist. No one can guarantee that Toady didnt have some new fun ideas ;) --[[User:Koltom|Koltom]] 22:59, 6 March 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== stark raving suicide ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My mechanic wanted silk cloth, which I didn't have, and eventually gone insane (&amp;quot;stark raving mad&amp;quot; to be precise).&lt;br /&gt;
Seconds after that I had message that he died in heat (I had artificial magma pool nearby).&lt;br /&gt;
He probably jumped into the pool like in melancholy. Main article states that only melancholic dwarves kill themselves in such way.&lt;br /&gt;
Could anyone confirm that mad ones do that too, and this wasn't just an accident/bug? [[User:Someone-else|Someone-else]] 16:59, 19 April 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps it ''was'' an accident -- I seem to recall that &amp;quot;stark raving mad&amp;quot; ones wander around at random. Perhaps it wandered into the lava. [[User:Anydwarf|Anydwarf]] 18:30, 19 April 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It was an accident, the stark raving mad ones wander around aimlessly, regardless of Z- levels. --[[User:Hoborobo|Hoborobo]] 12:53, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glassmaker with no glass ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I had an immigrant glassworker get a mood, seize a glass workshop, and created an artifact made entirely of gemstones. No glass involved or asked for. (No sand on the map, anyway.) He turned into a Legendary Glassworker, despite having never made a glass anything.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rewrite ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think I got most of the old information and then some into the new article.  Please make any necessary modifications. --[[User:Marble Dice|Marble Dice]] 01:22, 10 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Silk Cloth ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I had a dwarf demand silk cloth, but he refused to use my giant cave spider silk cloth. I didn't have any regular cave spider silk cloth. To verify that the silk was the problem, I used Companion to change the silk demand to any stone, and he immediately collected the rest of the materials and constructed the artifact.&lt;br /&gt;
Can anyone else confirm that giant cave spider silk cloth does '''not''' count as silk cloth? --[[User:Doniazade|Doniazade]] 08:55, 13 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:No, I'm pretty sure I can't. I've seen a dwarf grab GCS silk.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Could it be that you had thread and not cloth? --[[User:GreyMario|GreyMaria]] 13:59, 13 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Nope, giant cave spider cloth [3] sorted under cloth on the stock screen. --[[User:Doniazade|Doniazade]] 16:52, 13 May 2008 (EDT) &lt;br /&gt;
Probably they may specifically require GCS silk or specifically require CS silk. &amp;amp;mdash;[[User:Chaos|Chaos]] 14:10, 13 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
I figured it out - the silk was outside and I had accidentally left &amp;quot;Dwarves Stay Inside&amp;quot; on after the latest attack. --[[User:Doniazade|Doniazade]] 08:52, 14 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Engineer taken by secretive mood, and creates... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Evidently engineers who are taken by a secretive mood (&amp;quot;withdraws from society&amp;quot;, in case it's later determined that the descriptor has an effect) will have no problems taking over the mechanic's workshop. And there's only one thing mechanic-shops build - that's right, you heard right, ladies and gentlemen, I present ''Kodor ós: A claystone mechanism''. It's even available for use from the appropriate {{k|b}})uild screens. He decided to make this splendid 86,400o creation while on an eight-mechanism binge in that very same mechanic's workshop. Maybe dwarves choose the workshop they've been in the most often? --[[User:BismuthBismuthBismuth|BismuthBismuthBismuth]] 15:31, 13 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Ah, actually I can confirm I've had a Mechanic create an artifact mechanism as well. Stick some obsidian swords in that baby and you'll be good to go! That should probably go in the main article for skills vs workshops... I would expect siege engineers also have strange moods, but I imagine pump op and siege op fall under the general craftsman catch-all --[[User:Marble Dice|Marble Dice]] 15:45, 13 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'd like to smack BismuthBismuthBismuth with the facts stated in the article.&lt;br /&gt;
      A dwarf will claim a workshop according to their highest applicable skill&lt;br /&gt;
::In this case it was Engineering and therefore your mechanic went to a Mechanic's Workshop. It's the same with the possessed glassmakers. They hit a glassmaker's shop. --[[User:GreyMario|GreyMaria]] 15:49, 13 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'd like to hit GreyMario-Maria, preferably in the upper-body region, with the fact that at the time of my post, the table in the article did not mention mechanics whatsoever. --[[User:BismuthBismuthBismuth|BismuthBismuthBismuth]] 22:26, 13 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Pardon me, but I was not aware that ''mechanics'' worked at a ''mechanic's workshop'', where objects are created that have ''quality mofidiers'' and can thus become ''artifacts''. --[[User:GreyMario|GreyMaria]] 23:28, 13 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Pardon me as well, but it seems that the table in [http://www.dwarffortresswiki.net/index.php?title=Strange_mood&amp;amp;oldid=25231 this particular revision] did not encapsulate this information. '''GreyMario is throwing a tantrum!''' --[[User:BismuthBismuthBismuth|BismuthBismuthBismuth]] 15:22, 14 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Mechanics. Work at a mechanic's workshop. Produce items which have visible quality modifiers. Items with visible quality modifiers are eligible to be artifacts. THEREFORE, mechanics claim mechanic's workshops when they go fey. Seriously, logic sometimes, please? --[[User:GreyMario|GreyMaria]] 15:30, 14 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::That would follow if we knew for certain that the proposition &amp;quot;items with visible quality modifiers are eligible to artifacts&amp;quot; is necessarily true.  We don't.  For instance, siege engine components are &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;not&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; verified as artifact eligible.  Since that isn't a given, it's perfectly reasonable for people to not jump to the conclusion that a job type will create artifacts relevant to it until they see it happen. &amp;amp;mdash;[[User:Chaos|Chaos]] 16:26, 14 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i love the absurd randomness factor with artifacts - you end up with really weird stuff. like grates, and socks. a question pertinent to legendary mechanisms - i got a stupidly valuable one of these as the first legendary item in a new fort and i used it to create a gear assembly in a public dining area in the hopes that it would give dwarves happy thoughts, but after a few years gametime of checking randomly on them nothing particular showed up. any particular use along these lines for legendary mechanisms for something other then simple fortress value? --[[User:FruityBix|FruityBix]] 11:51, 10 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: weapon traps! --[[User:Bartavelle|Bartavelle]] 12:03, 10 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:: FWIW, that might be a more general answer for artifact items... I had a Weaponsmith dwarf go into a strange mood and create a lead warhammer (Yes, there was plenty of steel and iron around, but this dwarf likes lead, I guess). It can't be equipped as a weapon (lead isn't a valid material type normally for constructing weapons) but I can put it into a weapons trap. Which... is basically the only thing I can do with this 65000* artifact... -[[User:Fuzzy|Fuzzy]] 14:37, 10 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Actually, artifact equipment can be used, it just requires a &amp;quot;hero&amp;quot; level dwarf or higher. However, for the nonstandard material weapons and armor you may do well to forbid them so that they're not used. The actual effectiveness of odd material artifacts is supposedly lower than that of decent iron or steel equipment, and artifact equipment cannot be unequipped once a dwarf decides to use it. --[[User:Janus|Janus]] 15:36, 10 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Build your artifact mechanism into a really, really, really wonderful well. --[[User:Corona688|Corona688]] 11:37, 13 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tanner fixed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just had a Tanner claim a leather works, not a tannery. I updated the table. For the record, the dwarf has no skill level in leather working.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wonder if Tanners even claim Tanner's shops?  Tanner's shops just make leather, and leather doesn't have quality modifiers, so you shouldn't be able to  produce an artifact from one, aye?  That information came from an older version of the page, I wonder if it was inaccurate.  Weavers supposed claim Clothier's shops and not Looms, so it would make sense if Tanners were the same way. --[[User:Marble Dice|Marble Dice]] 18:08, 2 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Cooks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can confirm that cooks do not produce artifacts: my Peasant with Dabbling Cook/Brewer/(various social) and nothing else just took over a Craftsdwarf's Workshop. I'm removing the verify tag for cooks in the article. --[[User:Comonad|Comonad]] 16:16, 2 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
mmmm. . . . artifact roast.  [[User:Mirthmanor|Mirthmanor]] 19:12, 4 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Soapers etc. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It stands to reason that soapers, lye makers, and wood burners wouldn't make artifacts. Neither soap, lye, charcoal, nor ash have quality modifiers, and that's all those skills can produce. I'm pretty sure you can't have artifact soap, lye, charcoal, or ash.  --[[User:Tachyon|Tachyon]] 20:26, 11 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: My woodburner just got possessed. He wants a shell and wood. I have the shell but I'm not sure what type of wood he wants. --[[User:Ehertlein|Ehertlein]] 20:18, 22 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Not all demands need to be met ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just had a dwarf taken by a secretive mood and collect a huge variety of things:  4 stone, 1 block, 1 gem, 2 rough gems, bones, a shell, 2 leather.  He was further sketching for more bones, 2 leather, another stone, a log, another shell, and raw green glass.  The only things I didn't have on hand were the shell and the green glass -- dwarves seem to go through their list in order, and get stuck on certain items.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just hoped someone would eat a turtle (50/1678 chance!) and queued a raw green glass.  When the glass was made, he got started, totally ignoring his previous requests for wood, another shell, and the other things. Anyone else have this experience?  [[User:Mirthmanor|Mirthmanor]] 13:28, 13 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think they keep sketching images even after they get the items. Your dwarf already had all of the shells, leather, bones, stones, blocks, and gems he needed. [[User:Curudan|Curudan]] 15:26, 22 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::This is correct. I've had dwarves run out, grab two items, and then sit at the Workshop shouting a need for three items. When the item he was waiting on became available, he ran out, grabbed it, went back in, and started working. So it's pretty evident that they list ALL of the items they want, regardless of how many of them they've already collected. --[[User:Nekojin|Nekojin]] 22:28, 23 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Possession ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've had 14 moods in my current Fortress, 11 of them have been possessions. Am I really unlucky, or is the type of mood weighted? [[User:HeWhoIsPale|HeWhoIsPale]] 09:55, 26 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: As far as I can tell by looking at the game logic, each mood types are as likely to be rolled (except fell of course, which is selected if happiness&amp;lt;rand(128) or something like that). --[[User:Bartavelle|Bartavelle]] 07:56, 3 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:: I had a feeling I was just getting really unlucky, thanks. [[User:HeWhoIsPale|HeWhoIsPale]] 14:34, 3 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Furnace Operator ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apparently furnace operator is no longer a mood skill as of df 28 181 40d. I just had a expert furnace operator take over a Craftdwarf's Workshop and become a legendary stonecrafter. [[User:Otherdwarf|Otherdwarf]] 10:26, 1 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I had one take over a mason's workshop, I would guess that Furnace Operator is treating like Engraver or Miner. I'm kind of disappointed, I was hoping he'd churn out an artifact coke or something.[[User:Gandalf the Dwarf (No, really! Look it up!)|Gandalf the Dwarf (No, really! Look it up!)]] 13:03, 14 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Back when furnace operator was moodable, they'd turn out metal crafts.  But taking over a mason's workshop is surprising.  Occasionally they'll take over a random workshop and convert it into the type they want -- what artifact did the dwarf produce?  And, just to rule out some obvious things, did the dwarf have dabbling skill in mining, masonry, or engraving?--[[User:Maximus|Maximus]] 13:51, 14 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::He went crazy looking for some kind of rough gem, so we'll never know.  It was ''right'' after the dwarf trading caravan left, too, so I really had no chance whatsoever.  I don't know for sure what skills he had, I don't think he had much other than Furnace Operator, Architect, and the social skills though.  I ''might'' have enabled mining, but there was plenty of work for him at the smelter so I don't know for sure.--[[User:Gandalf the Dwarf (No, really! Look it up!)|Gandalf the Dwarf (No, really! Look it up!)]] 15:56, 14 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Chunk Butchery? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well, even though the selection of items for artifacts is totally random, its a bit wierd if a macabre dwarf goes to a butcher's workshop and starts bringing in tons of dwarf CHUNKS! My dwarf just started doing that, should I expect rotting meat (yes, the chunks are already rotten)? - 09:57, 30 October 2008 Stinhad Limarezum &lt;br /&gt;
: ^_^ &amp;quot;This is a delicious meat pie. All craftsdwarfship is of the highest quality. On the item is an image of a dwarf and dwarves in rotting dwarf chunks. The dwarf is baking the other dwarves into meat pies. The artwork relates to the rise of the dwarf butcher Sweeney Todd as the cook of The Fleet Street in 78&amp;quot; -[[User:Fuzzy|Fuzzy]] 11:11, 30 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, ''do'' post the description of the artifact when the dwarf completes it.  (&amp;quot;Menaces with spikes of dwarf chunk?&amp;quot;  I'd be intimidated for sure.)--[[User:Maximus|Maximus]] 13:18, 30 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What Workshop? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;any&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt; way to discover what workshop a dwarf in a secretive mood requires?  I had nearly everything.  I built a siege workshop and a bowery before I ran out of ideas and he went beserk. --[[User:Corona688|Corona688]] 10:55, 3 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You have to look at what skills he has first and rule out the obvious.  If he has no mood-able skills then it's going to be a craftsdwarf's workshop.  If you have hit magma and he wants a forge or glass furnace, he will insist on the magma version of that workshop.  Finally, maybe one of your existing workshops was inaccessible or you accidentally [[forbid]] it at some point.  If none of that works, I'm out of ideas too.--[[User:Maximus|Maximus]] 13:01, 3 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I have a functioning magma glass furnace and I had to build a normal glass furnace when my glass maker became secretive. [[User:HeWhoIsPale|HeWhoIsPale]] 14:23, 11 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Same here, in fact I had 2 moody glass making dwarves refuse to use anything but a normal glass furnace when there were 5 fully functional magma glass furnaces in the same fort. (sorry, almost forgot to sign) --[[User:Alkyon|Alkyon]] 14:27, 11 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Ditto.  A glassmaker got possessed and refused to use my magma glass furnace.  I had to build a regular one. --[[User:Schwern|Schwern]] 19:33, 27 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ah.  In older versions, they'd insist on a magma workshop, when possible.  Do they now insist on using a regular workshop, or has anyone seen a moody dwarf use a magma workshop in recent versions?--[[User:Maximus|Maximus]] 14:34, 11 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I believe my metalsmith is waiting for my magma forge to come on line, I have a standard forge built, but that isn't doing anything for him. Does anyone know what effect fluctuating power will have on the strange mood? Edit: If a claimed workshop looses power for even a millisecond, the mood fails. [[User:HeWhoIsPale|HeWhoIsPale]] 12:02, 18 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Possessed Child ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have a child that has become possessed and taken over one of my craft workshops (of course).  He is muttering the following: rough color, leather skin, bone yes, stone rock, cloth thread, blocks bricks, and a shell.  He has already acquired the following: turtle bones, donkey bones [4], microcline blocks, turtle shell, rough pink garnets, dog leather, carp leather, and hematite.  I have plenty of all the things that he's already gathered, so I'm assuming that he doesn't need anymore of those items.  That leaves the thread.  I have turned off my auto-loom a while ago so that I would keep the thread around for artifacts.  I currently have plenty of plant thread (4 pig tail and 14 rope reed) and enough spider silk (5).  What I don't have is giant spider silk.  I have confirmed that the child has access to all these items, including the thread which I have piles next to his workshop.  Still he doesn't start construction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can any help?  Is there a difference for artifact creation between regular cave spider silk and giant cave spider silk?  ---[[User:Frewfrux|Frewfrux]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Do you have both silk and plant cloth available?  (Not just thread.)  And do you see any specific cloth preferences in his thoughts and preferences screen?--[[User:Maximus|Maximus]] 01:32, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Argh.  I bet that's it.  No silk cloth, just thread.  I have had guys go crazy for lack of thread before, so I never make silk cloth, just kept the thread.  Oh well, the child is now melancholy.  I can re-load and see what would happen if I make the thread into cloth.  Maybe I'll test that out.  ---[[User:Frewfrux|Frewfrux]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Wouldn't you be able to solve this problem by only weaving dyed thread? Then you'll always have some thread waiting to be dyed. --[[User:RomeoFalling|RomeoFalling]] 03:04, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::You could also leave high quality, expensive materials lying around Forbidden, and only Claim them when someone's trying to make an artifact. --[[User:Navian|Navian]] 15:07, 11 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Getting More Strange Moods ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the article, the number of artifacts is limited by &amp;quot;The number of items created divided by 200.&amp;quot;  This indicates that making bolts (5 for each bone or 25 for each log) or brewing (5 units of drink for each unit of plant brewed) are efficient ways to encourage strange moods.  Does that sound accurate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It also states that the number of revealed subterranean tiles is a limit.  Does that mean an area like a chasm, where many tiles are revealed to start with, will produce more strange moods?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, does anyone know whether the division rounds up or down?  [[User:Gairabad|Gairabad]] 22:24, 16 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'd be willing to bet all stacks count as only one &amp;quot;item&amp;quot; for this kind of calculation.  200 sounds like a paltry number, however.  If rocks are counted as items, most fortresses have thousands of them in just a few years.  The other number is what is most significant (I wonder where the heck it comes from?)  I've had four miners digging non-stop for about 10 years now, and my stocks menu says I have 70,000 stones.  Allowing for underground soil tiles (which don't produce stone) and stone/ore consumed by industry, each miner can probably clear about 2,000 tiles a year: one artifact.  I have 21 artifacts in my fortress now (and two failed moods early on), so if that rate is indicative, I'd say you want to employ three or more miners non-stop to maximize your chances.--[[User:Maximus|Maximus]] 00:09, 17 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The guy who wrote [http://www.dwarffortresswiki.net/index.php/Stone_management#Block_Stockpile this] doesn't seem to think that stones count as created items.  Also, &amp;quot;revealed tiles&amp;quot; is ambiguous.  For example, [http://www.dwarffortresswiki.net/index.php/Exploratory_mining#Mine_shafts this] method is very good at showing you what's inside of a tile without actually mining it out.  Do you suppose that seeing whats inside is enough?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Where do you think these numbers came from anyway?  I'm gonna take a look through the edit history and try to track them down.  [[User:Gairabad|Gairabad]] 00:15, 17 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::They came during [http://www.dwarffortresswiki.net/index.php?title=Strange_mood&amp;amp;diff=25038&amp;amp;oldid=24936 this edit].  They're so specific I've got to think the author did some poking around with a disassembler.  Again, though, 200 is such a paltry number.  If underground &amp;quot;open space&amp;quot; counts, then discovering a chasm, bottomless pit, or magma pipe should many thousands thousands of revealed tiles.  If underground floor tiles are needed, you'll have to mine most of them out yourself.--[[User:Maximus|Maximus]] 00:34, 17 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I had a chat with [[User:GreyMario|GreyMario]] over at his talk page, since he edited the page around the time the changes were made.  He seemed fairly certain that all you had to do to &amp;quot;reveal&amp;quot; a tile was to have a passable square next to it, so I edited the article to reflect that.  He did not, however, know anything about how bolts or stones would affect things.  Right now my hopes are on [[User:Marble_Dice|Marble Dice]], whom I believe made the actual addition.  I'm not sure if he's a very active user though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::By the way, the reason I'm doing all this is that I'm considering optimizing a fortress for strange moods: have '''lots''' of dwarves with only &amp;quot;dabbling&amp;quot; in a single strange mood skill to gain maximum benefit from the moods.  Any ideas for fortress strategies that will go well with this?  [[User:Gairabad|Gairabad]] 02:44, 17 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I saw the conversation -- I keep my eye on [[Special:Recentchanges]].  What he says about &amp;quot;reveal&amp;quot; is correct, as far as I know.  I still wonder about &amp;quot;open space&amp;quot; tiles.  If they count as revealed, all you really need to do is find a chasm/pit/magma pipe and you'll be in moods for years to come.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I've done the dabbling strategy in the past.  It's best to emphasize just a few skills you really really want that are otherwise hard to train due to limited materials -- armorsmith, weaponsmith, bone carver, leatherworker, carpenter, etc.  It works fine with any fortress strategy.--[[User:Maximus|Maximus]] 04:30, 17 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Two missing labors ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strand Extractor and Blacksmith don't currently appear in either the Causes Moods category or the Doesn't Cause Moods category.  I put Strand Extractor in Doesn't Cause Moods and the Blacksmith in Causes Moods; feel free to correct me if you think I'm wrong.  [[User:Gairabad|Gairabad]] 19:59, 18 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I can confirm that blacksmith is moodable, I've got a nice steel chest to show for it.  It stands to reason that strand extractor isn't moodable, but we don't know for sure -- I've slapped a verify on it.--[[User:Maximus|Maximus]] 21:01, 18 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Order of stuff ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm wondering if dwarves always claim items in a certain order.  For example, when a dwarf wants three pieces of wood he always wants them back-to-back, never wood gem wood bone wood.  So are types ALWAYS in a certain order?  My current moody dwarf wanted two bars of metal, then spider silk cloth, then ash logs, then bones, then a rough gem, then a shell.  Knowing the order might help you guess what the dwarf wants next if he doesn't need to wait for anything (and thus tell you what he wants).  This might be useful for micromanaging forbidding stuff to make sure your dwarf gets the highest value things available. --[[User:Sowelu|Sowelu]] 23:19, 26 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;This is actually well-defined in the article, if you'd bothered to look close enough. Dwarves will gather items in the order they scream their demands in.&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; It's unknown. I think there's no real order, just similar things end up grouped together. :V --[[User:GreyMario|GreyMaria]] 23:32, 26 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::fail.  Uh, I mean, as soon as anyone else sees a strange mood, it can either be disproven, or we can start putting some data together immediately and be done pretty quick.  I saw:  Metal Bars, Silk Cloth, Wood, Bones, Rough Gem, Shell.  If anyone sees bones before wood or something, that means there's no guaranteed order.  But no harm done.  :) --[[User:Sowelu|Sowelu]] 23:36, 26 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's simpler than that. Items have a certain number of slots for improvements, and for artifacts the first improvement slot is always filled by the base material of the item. Then the rest are filled in order, with whatever is a valid candidate for that slot (which is probably 'anything that's anything' in every case, though I'm not absolutely sure.) So, there isn't any explicit sorting because it has to be in order.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::If you fill an item's slots with ordinary decoration, which is easiest to do by encrusting a wide variety of gems on a piece of furniture or the like, you'll see what I mean. Maybe. --[[User:Navian|Navian]] 23:40, 26 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah!  So you're saying that instead of generating a list of ingredients, it first plans out the artifact itself, saying &amp;quot;This one is a chest, it has hanging rings and an image, first let's get a material for the chest, then a material for the hanging rings, then a material for the image&amp;quot;?  That makes a ton of sense, and answers my question.  Thanks! --[[User:Sowelu|Sowelu]] 23:47, 26 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Well, I know it doesn't do that, because if you close the game and reopen it, you can get different items... With my elf game, I had one artifact that came out as either a thong, a left mitten, or a rope on five tries. But it's roughly the same idea, even with the details randomized upon creation. --[[User:Navian|Navian]] 00:05, 27 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fell Mood Demands ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It looks like when a brooding dwarf sits in the tanner's shop and says he needs &amp;quot;Things...&amp;quot; what he's looking for is vermin remains.  Other demands are like in Fey moods. --[[User:Sev|Sev]] 22:24, 3 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Confusing macabre mood ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My mayor just entered one, while 'quite content', claimed a smelter, waited for a bit, until the parts appeared (the vermin must have died). He then created a roach rock chitin bracelet, and gained the carpenter skill. Am I missing something here? Smelter, rock and carpenter don't seem to mix well... Note: The only skills were proficient cook and fish cleaner, with some dabbling and noice social.--[[User:Finbeer|Finbeer]] 13:03, 6 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Carpenter?  Or wood crafter?  Claiming a smelter isn't out of the question: they sometimes grab a random workshop and turn it into the one they want (is it still a smelter?).  And what is roach rock?  Give the actual description of the artifact.--[[User:Maximus|Maximus]] 19:14, 6 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Carpenter. It's still a smelter, yes.  &amp;quot;This is a large roach chitin bracelet. All craftsdwaftship is of the highest quality. It is encircled with bands of large roach  chitin and dwarf bone. This object menaces with spikes of rat leather.&amp;quot;--[[User:Finbeer|Finbeer]] 15:32, 7 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Hmm.  Post that one on the forums, find out if it's an actual bug.  Does sound pretty nonstandard.--[[User:Maximus|Maximus]] 22:50, 7 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::  :-D Pretty sure that a roach is an actual bug. -[[User:Fuzzy|Fuzzy]] 09:00, 8 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::D'oh.--[[User:Maximus|Maximus]] 22:56, 8 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I did have two very close together, but I am certain that neither had any carpenter skill, and the smelter was claimed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I've just had a similar occurance.  Immediately after a goblin ambush (that killed 5 of my soldiers and caused major unhappiness in many dwarves), one dwarf that had lost a friend but was just &amp;quot;content&amp;quot; clained a tanner's workshop, grabbed a rhesus macque chunk, and made a rather boring rhesus macaque leather amulet (no embelishments apart from rhesus macaque leather bands).  It did have quite an impressive name though - Gethustongos Nelas Luror, &amp;quot;Harshtainted the Flicker of Cruelties&amp;quot;. [[User:Iapetus|Iapetus]] 19:47, 10 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rough Gems ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EVERY Fey Mood that has happened for the last 3 years has required Rough Gems!  Argh!  Mining out an entire Z-level has found ONE GEM, which I was idiotic enough to cut the instant I found it.  I do not have Rough Gems.  You cannot buy Rough Gems.  My fortress will die slowly and painfully without Rough Gems.  Cut green glass is good enough when a fey dwarf demands cut gems, why isn't raw green glass good enough when they want rough gems?  Can it be made good enough with a mod?  --[[User:Corona688|Corona688]] 11:19, 13 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Dig down to an igneous intrusive level - they have more gems. --[[User:Squirrelloid|Squirrelloid]] 14:19, 13 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::To mod out gem-demanding fey dwarves, you could remove all gems and then generate a new world. Alternatively, if you don't mind the lack of moods, turn them off in init.txt. Personally, I highly dislike moods, since they just make it that much easier to have abundant so-called &amp;quot;legendary&amp;quot; dwarves, although the random killer effect is quite nice. --[[User:Savok|Savok]] 20:15, 13 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trapper?==&lt;br /&gt;
Has anyone seen a dwarf get trapper experience from a mood?  I've made a couple of artifact animal traps at this point, and all of them were by dwarves without the trapper skill who received xp in skills related to the material.  (ie, my turtle-shell animal trap was made by someone who became a legendary bonecarver therefrom).  I know I made a similar comment on the Trapper talk page.  From the other end, I'm sure I've had immigrant trappers get moods before and have never seen a legendary trapper, although I don't recall specifically enough to be certain they had moods.  But I've seen zero evidence that Trapper is actually a moodable skill.  --[[User:Squirrelloid|Squirrelloid]] 16:00, 15 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Craftdwarf's Workshop==&lt;br /&gt;
I just had a lye maker take over a metalsmith's forge and turn out a bracelet; now he's a legendary metalcrafter.  I think that &amp;quot;Dwarves with only the following skills will construct their artifact at a craftsdwarf's workshop...&amp;quot; might be too constrictive, and that such dwarves could seize any craftdwarf-related workshop (including forges and carpenter's shops), not just a craftdwarf's workshop.  Anyone else observed this behavior? --[[User:Wingus|Wingus]] 09:55, 22 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You're certain that the dwarf in question had no experience in any other tasks? --[[User:N9103|Edward]] 11:19, 22 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, the lyemaker had no other (non-social) skills.  He was a recent immigrant I was using as a hauler. --[[User:Wingus|Wingus]] 11:35, 22 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There have been quite a few anomalous moods that we haven't documented properly yet.--[[User:Maximus|Maximus]] 14:34, 22 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure this falls here.  Had a Potash Maker refuse every shop I built, I had thought I had a craft shop.  Turns out it was forbidden, I reclaimed it and he claimed it for his mood.  I think this is verified.--[[User:Draco18s|Draco18s]] 15:18, 3 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Time limit of a mood. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do we have a fix on the exact time the player has to satisfy a mood before the dwarf goes insane?  Any clue on whether it's fixed or variable?&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Shurikane|Shurikane]] 12:04, 27 December 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Iapetus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://dwarffortresswiki.org/index.php?title=40d:Soldier&amp;diff=22460</id>
		<title>40d:Soldier</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://dwarffortresswiki.org/index.php?title=40d:Soldier&amp;diff=22460"/>
		<updated>2008-12-25T23:08:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Iapetus: /* Squads */ Added comment about squads with hospitalized leaders&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Dwarves in your [[military]] will be one of the following types of '''soldiers'''. What type of soldier they are will be determined by whichever [[weapon]] they are most [[skill]]ed at using. All soldiers can carry [[shield]]s, regardless of what weapon they use. Weapon, armor, and squad choices are controlled from the Military screen ({{key|m}}). The dwarven military is organized via use of the [[squad]] system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Training ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soldiers will train when not on duty. Marksdwarves will shoot at [[archery target]]s if they are correctly set up and you have wood or bone [[bolts]] available. Melee dwarves (including wrestlers) will [[sparring|spar]] with their weapons in a [[barracks]] if you have built one. For full information, see the article on [[sparring]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Squads ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You may organize your dwarves into squads of troops through the {{k|m}}ilitary menu. Select the squad commander, then press {{k|Enter}}. Select another dwarf, and press {{k|Enter}} to add this dwarf to the first soldier's squad. When you are finished adding to a particular squad, use the {{k|Spacebar}} to end the assignments. Adding an unenlisted dwarf to a currently active squad will activate this new soldier. Adding dwarves to an inactive squad will not activate the squad.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You may also select sub-commanders in this manner, creating an established chain of command.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Active squads will stay close to the leader of their squad. If he takes a break to Eat or Drink, his squad will follow him.{{verify}} They will also follow him back to his bed if he goes to rest or heal.  If a squad leader is hospitalized, the dwarves under his command will do nothing useful until he is healed, or a different leader is assigned.  Squads will work towards a single goal -- if attacking an group of hostiles that scatter in several directions, the entire squad will follow one hostile.{{verify}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Duty Roster ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You must activate and deactivate your squads through the {{k|m}}ilitary menu's &amp;quot;{{k|v}}iew squad&amp;quot; sub-menu. Some dwarves will grow unhappy if left on patrol duty too long, and they will not have a chance to improve their skills. A squad that is off-duty will spar in a [[barracks]] or train at [[archery target]]s with wooden or bone bolts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You may wish to design outdoor training areas so that your soldiers do not fall prey to [[Cave adaptation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rations ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You may also specify if the squad should carry food and water, using [[backpack]]s and [[waterskin]]s respectively, using the military menu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Soldier classes ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Every weapon has an associated skill. Soldiers will name themselves according to what [[Weapon damage|weapon]] they are most skilled at using, as long as they are at least a novice rank in one. Thus a soldier whose highest weapon skill is with a spear will be known as a Speardwarf, even if the soldier has been reassigned to train with an axe instead.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Marksdwarves ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Marksdwarves, thought of as the wimpiest soldiers, are armed with [[crossbow]]s and deal pierce damage from afar. A [[bolt]] does a fine job at piercing the internal organs of a creature while also doing some damage to outside parts. This is of limited use against creatures without organs, such as [[Magma man|magma men]]. Occasionally a bolt will get stuck in a target. The only known use for this is that a [[wrestling]] dwarf may grab the bolt and twist it in the [[wound]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Marksdwarf who is forced into melee will use the [[hammer]] skill to bash enemies with their crossbow, so you may consider crosstraining them as hammerdwarves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Immigrating [[Trapper]]s often arrive with a Novice Marksdwarf skill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Speardwarves ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Speardwarves specialize in pierce damage and will puncture an enemy's organs quickly and critically once in range. The spear doesn't hit as hard as an axe, but it has a higher chance of piercing organs, making it a better choice against large, living creatures like demons or dragons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Axedwarves ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Axedwarves, thought by some to be the only true dwarven soldier, specialize in slash damage, also known as the fine art of mangling and severing limbs. This damage type is useful for taking away opponents' mobility and means of attack while eventually bleeding them to death. Battle axes move slower than swords but do more damage per stroke.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Sworddwarves ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sworddwaves deal both slash and pierce damage. Swords can cut off limbs, like an axe, but also reasonably good at hitting internal organs, like a spear.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Macedwarves ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Macedwarves are exactly like hammerdwarves, but use a weapon with a different name and skill, though exactly the same in game terms.  Assuming none of your weaponsmiths have a preference for maces, hammers are slightly better, since the hammer skill is also used by a marksman who has run out of bolts (he bashes enemies with his crossbow.  This is the only time when it's good to have a metal crossbow, by the way.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hammerdwarves ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hammerdwarves, the other true dwarven soldiers, specialize in blunt damage, which breaks the bones of the enemy and will often repel the enemy some distance, causing extra damage if they are bashed into a wall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Human Hammermen use a two-handed maul instead of a war hammer. More powerful, mauls focus on breaking bones rather than mangling limbs, though that does also happen on the occasion. They have a greater chance to knock back an opponent than a mace does but comes at the cost of speed. Also should someone be knocked back into an obstacle, they'll take extra damage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Wrestlers ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wrestlers focus on tying the opponent into knots, choking them, and breaking limbs. Creatures tied up in [[wrestling]] will do nothing else and remain immobile, perfect for a marksdwarf to pick off the creature at a range or an armed dwarf to carve into bite-sized pieces. Also note that this skill determines how much a dwarf will evade/dodge attacks, so it can be useful even for a dwarf with a weapon equipped. Wrestlers are much weaker than any other soldier type, but forcing powerful opponents to wrestle can exhaust them and make them easy prey for other soldiers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wrestler skill will be improved somewhat even while practicing with a weapon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Recruits ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any dwarf without at least one of the above skills at [[skill|Novice]] level or better will be classified as recruits. If you keep them off duty, they will train at their selected weapon until they reach Novice skill in it, at which point they will turn into one of the above weaponsdwarves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heroes and Champions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once soldiers reach [[skill|Great]] skill level in any weapon (or wrestling), they will become '''heroes''', will be called Lord/Master/Elite, have a different colour shade and can no longer be removed from the military. Their &amp;quot;Pref&amp;quot; menu will be replaced by the text &amp;quot;This hero need not work&amp;quot;, and you will not be able to deactivate them (make them civilians again), transfer them into or out of the [[Fortress Guard|Guard]], or assign work [[dog]]s to them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can still change their weapon and armor settings via the {{key|m}}ilitary screen ({{key|w}}eapons), and to change their soldiering orders ({{key|v}}iew squad). Heroes in either the Fortress or Royal Guard cannot be given military orders via the Squads screen ({{key|x}}) and will become permanently useless. If you have any Expert, Professional, or Accomplished soldiers in the Guard, be sure to transfer them out while you still can. Alternatively, a dwarf on the verge of becoming a hero in one weapon skill can be transferred to another weapon and retrained; the attribute bonuses from gaining each weapon skill will stack. Heroes cannot trade, so it is advisable for your trader not to be given military training.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Upon reaching [[legendary]] skill level in any weapon, a hero will become a '''champion''', with the following [[announcement]]: &amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;dwarfname&amp;gt;'' has become a legendary champion! Hail ''&amp;lt;dwarfname&amp;gt;''!&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;. Champions behave the same as heroes, although they are additionally exempt from the [[dwarven economy]], like all legendary dwarves. Champions cannot serve under heroes or normal soldiers, but willingly serve under other Champions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Military FAQ}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Dwarves]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Military]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Iapetus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://dwarffortresswiki.org/index.php?title=40d_Talk:Ambusher&amp;diff=30639</id>
		<title>40d Talk:Ambusher</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://dwarffortresswiki.org/index.php?title=40d_Talk:Ambusher&amp;diff=30639"/>
		<updated>2008-12-20T20:30:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Iapetus: /* go get him */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Unconscious spotters? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The article states that you can be seen by an unconscious creature when standing next to it, yet I always get back into sneak mode as soon as I get an enemy unconscious, and it always has worked, as did passing right next to an unconscious creature. Never got a chance to gouge out eyes in the new version, but in the old DF, I could start sneaking very close to a cyclops, about three tiles, maybe two, which is more than close enough for him to normally see you and prevent you from sneaking. I'd like someone to confirm this, but I'm fairly certain the part about unconscious creatures is false. --[[User:Ryke Masters|Ryke Masters]] 20:45, 2 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, I'm pretty sure that statement is false.  I'll remove it in a day unless anyone thinks it true. --[[User:Karlito|Karlito]] 00:55, 3 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;hunting&amp;quot; skill link redirects to this page, which is kind of useless.  [[User:Mindsnap|Mindsnap]] 15:49, 6 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
: Well, there is no hunting skill, and hunters all use Ambushing. I figure there ought to be some sort of &amp;quot;activity&amp;quot; page that describes how to hunt, equipment, products, risks, etc - where should that be, though? Not here, although there should probably be a link from here to it. [[User:Kidinnu|Kidinnu]] 14:23, 7 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ` ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well, my hunters keep catching things then my butcher won't do anything with it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
if I am chasing a &amp;quot;foo&amp;quot; what is the sequence to follow to get from:&lt;br /&gt;
1 hunter&lt;br /&gt;
1 foo&lt;br /&gt;
1 Butcher's shop&lt;br /&gt;
1 butcher&lt;br /&gt;
1 kitchen&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to &amp;quot;food&amp;quot;?&lt;br /&gt;
TIA&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:GarrieIrons|GarrieIrons]] 10:06, 4 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Provided the hunter is bringing the corpses back to camp (does one need a refuse pile for this? I forget), then the butcher should automatically butcher it, turning it into meat, bones, a skin, a skull, fat, and &amp;quot;chunks&amp;quot;, which are inedible.  Fat can be rendered into [[tallow]] in the kitchen, which can then be cooked into a meal.  (Mmm, horse tallow roast.)  Meat can be eaten raw, so you don't need to cook it.--[[User:Maximus|Maximus]] 12:46, 4 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::From what I have noticed they will bring the kill straight to the butchers shop but if they drop it to drink or whatnot you can {{k|p}} lace a {{k|r}}efuse pile under the corpse and the butcher will go out and get it. Or you could chain pile it to a refuse pile right next to your butcher shop if you have extra hands about. [[User:Jikor|Jikor]] 06:54, 24 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Lack of prey ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
is there something I can do to get more work for my hunters? I have started drafting them all to the millitary becuase they already have armour and a bow when they turn up! [[User:GarrieIrons|GarrieIrons]] 07:30, 30 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, if you have few/no spawning animals on your map, then making them marksdwarves is by far the best option, as the only alternative really, is training them in a new profession. --[[User:N9103|Edward]] 22:05, 30 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== go get him ==&lt;br /&gt;
Nothing more fun than watching your unarmed hunter chase and wrestle a groundhog to death *laugh*. *note to self: when making a hunter always check for weapon preference* --[[User:Koltom|Koltom]] 09:00, 19 February 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm seeing the same thing. Although, in my case, all three of my hunters were set up with crossbows and quivers. Initially, they ran out of bolts. No worries except that now, although their weapon choice is set to crossbow, they won't pick one up. I've tried changing their jobs, changing their military status, and none of it makes a difference as best I can tell. Now, they don't even pick up the crossbow or quiver, let alone ammo.&lt;br /&gt;
:And, in my case, it's beating up Elks and Muskoxes... tough dwarves.   -[[User:Fuzzy|Fuzzy]] 01:09, 31 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Personally, I liked seeing my hammer-equiped hunter whacking horses and other large animals so hard they go flying through the air :) [[User:Iapetus|Iapetus]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Exhausted animal supply ==&lt;br /&gt;
Through my use of several hunters on round-the-clock 'killing everything in sight' duty It appears that no more animals spawn on my map. I really wish I could hunt some gorilla for a more balanced dwarf diet aside from dogmeat. --[[User:Jemulov|Jemulov]] 13:41, 26 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How many bolts? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On this page it says that immigrating hunters arrive with a stack of 30 steel bolts. However, I've got a stack of 34 lying right here, which means they bring more, though I think the stack is partly used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's been a while since I've had a hunter or marksdwarf arrive; can anyone check how large a stack they each bring (and is it the same for both)?--[[User:Maximus|Maximus]] 12:28, 31 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Okay, 36 for a hunter.  Might be more for a marksdwarf.--[[User:Maximus|Maximus]] 00:46, 4 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:38 for another hunter.  So I'll call it 30 to 40, pending further information.--[[User:Maximus|Maximus]] 13:10, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Iapetus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://dwarffortresswiki.org/index.php?title=40d_Talk:Attribute&amp;diff=35282</id>
		<title>40d Talk:Attribute</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://dwarffortresswiki.org/index.php?title=40d_Talk:Attribute&amp;diff=35282"/>
		<updated>2008-12-20T20:23:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Iapetus: /* Which Attribute? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Which Attribute?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What determines which attribute you get when you gain an attribute? Is it random, does it follow a preset order, or does it depend on which skills you've been increasing? --[[User:Valdemar|Valdemar]] 19:32, 21 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It is random. [[User:VengefulDonut|VengefulDonut]] 01:09, 22 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::hehe yes, my legendary clerk has max strength and agility, and is very tough. never done a days manual labour in his life... [[User:Twiggie|Twiggie]] 12:05, 16 April 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: You try working in an office where the chairs, tables, doors, filing cabinets, etc are made out of rock :) Heck, I wouldn't be surprised if the dwarves made their pens and even writing paper out of rock (and don't forget the menacing spikes and hanging rings of goblin bone). [[User:Iapetus|Iapetus]] 15:23, 20 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Do pre-assigned skill levels give attributes? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's say I'm just starting out and I bring along a Proficient Mason.  Will he start off with attribute bonuses?  How about if a &amp;lt;no-title&amp;gt; Mason immigrates?  Will he have any XP to start off his attribute gain?  [[User:Gairabad|Gairabad]] 18:14, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes and yes.  Further, I suspect invaders, diplomats, caravan guards, and the like all come with undisplayed skills that are the source of their attributes.--[[User:Maximus|Maximus]] 19:20, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Iapetus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://dwarffortresswiki.org/index.php?title=40d_Talk:Rhesus_macaque&amp;diff=37769</id>
		<title>40d Talk:Rhesus macaque</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://dwarffortresswiki.org/index.php?title=40d_Talk:Rhesus_macaque&amp;diff=37769"/>
		<updated>2008-11-26T23:40:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Iapetus: Ouch!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I was attacked by these guys in my fortress, and the attacks seemed to co-incide with a kobold raid, are they actually smart enough for diplomacy or was it a coincidence? (around 10 of them, 3 kobold thieves, good practice for my new military) ---Major&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was coincidence they attacked at same time--[[User:ThVaz|ThVaz]] 05:35, 20 February 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ouch! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a recent game, a pack of these raided my outpost very early in the game (before I had moved all my stuff into secure stockpiles).  They stole several things, including the rope I'd bought so I could build a well as early as possible.  Well, I wasn't going to stand for that, so I activated my entire military (all of whom were novice wrestlers or better) and unleashed them on the monkey menace...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Who then managed to kill one of my dwarves!  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fortunately it was my &amp;quot;miscellaneous crafts dwarf&amp;quot; rather than anyone critcal like a miner/woodcutter/farmer, but it was quite a shock and a setback to lose someone so early on.  (Although part of a pattern I seem to be getting lately of losing someone within the first year: first a fisherdwarf drowning (dragged in by a long nosed gar, I think), then this macaque murder, and more recently a couple of fire imp attacks). [[User:Iapetus|Iapetus]] 18:40, 26 November 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Iapetus</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>