40d Talk:Bar - Revision history

Briess: moved Talk:Broken/40d\x3aBar to 40d Talk:Bar

2010-03-08T04:11:47Z

moved Talk:Broken/40d\x3aBar to 40d Talk:Bar

Briess: moved Talk:Bar to Talk:40d:Bar: 40d namespace migration

2010-03-08T01:53:20Z

moved Talk:Bar to [[Talk:40d:Bar]]: 40d namespace migration

Albedo at 19:06, 13 October 2009

2009-10-13T19:06:23Z

Nemokara: /* Own article vs redirect */

2009-10-11T08:58:07Z

Own article vs redirect

Quietust at 18:12, 16 September 2009

2009-09-16T18:12:13Z

Quietust at 17:57, 16 September 2009

2009-09-16T17:57:22Z

Quietust at 17:55, 16 September 2009

2009-09-16T17:55:45Z

Albedo: This has "stub article" written all over it.

2009-09-16T17:52:59Z

This has "stub article" written all over it.

Albedo: Own article vs redirect

2009-09-16T17:50:35Z

Own article vs redirect

New page

== Own article vs redirect ==

this really deserves its own page
This (now stub) article used to redirect to [[metal]]. Isn't bar:metal like quiver:bolt, something that goes hand in hand. What does a separate article give that the discussion on metal did not, and more? A discussion of one is a discussion of them both - same article, neh?--[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 17:50, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:06, 13 October 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:
	::I've just extended the page somewhat, mostly mirroring the layout of [[block]]. --[[User:Quietust\|Quietust]] 18:12, 16 September 2009 (UTC)		::I've just extended the page somewhat, mostly mirroring the layout of [[block]]. --[[User:Quietust\|Quietust]] 18:12, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
	:::I'd like to include something on how many bars it takes to make various products (eg a bucket vs a cabinet) ... but as I'm new and don't know that information, could someone else? They don't all take 3 bars, right?[[User:Nemokara\|Nemokara]] 08:58, 11 October 2009 (UTC)		:::I'd like to include something on how many bars it takes to make various products (eg a bucket vs a cabinet) ... but as I'm new and don't know that information, could someone else? They don't all take 3 bars, right?[[User:Nemokara\|Nemokara]] 08:58, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
		+	::::All [[furniture]] takes 3 bars - which is painful. [[Armour]] varies between 1 bar/2 items (gauntlets) and 3/1 (plate armour). Goblets (metal [[mug]]s) are 1 bar/3, and some metal crafts depend on the crafting skill and a randomizer. Most (all?) others take 1 bar only. I agree it would be handy, but that contributing editor would have to do some quick research to verify 100%, esp w/ some of the other less commonly produced items. (You'd just open a forge's menu, go down the list of options, watching your inventory carefully.)--[[User:Albedo\|Albedo]] 19:06, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:58, 11 October 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:I personally found it rather confusing that when coal, ash, potash, pearlash, and soap refer to the fact that they come in bars, they redirected to [[metal]], which (rightly) makes absolutely no mention of other materials that come in bars. In other words, a stub article is better than no article at all. --[[User:Quietust\|Quietust]] 17:55, 16 September 2009 (UTC)		:I personally found it rather confusing that when coal, ash, potash, pearlash, and soap refer to the fact that they come in bars, they redirected to [[metal]], which (rightly) makes absolutely no mention of other materials that come in bars. In other words, a stub article is better than no article at all. --[[User:Quietust\|Quietust]] 17:55, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
	::I've just extended the page somewhat, mostly mirroring the layout of [[block]]. --[[User:Quietust\|Quietust]] 18:12, 16 September 2009 (UTC)		::I've just extended the page somewhat, mostly mirroring the layout of [[block]]. --[[User:Quietust\|Quietust]] 18:12, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
		+	:::I'd like to include something on how many bars it takes to make various products (eg a bucket vs a cabinet) ... but as I'm new and don't know that information, could someone else? They don't all take 3 bars, right?[[User:Nemokara\|Nemokara]] 08:58, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:12, 16 September 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	This (now stub) article used to redirect to [[metal]]. Isn't bar:metal like quiver:bolt, something that goes hand in hand. What does a separate article give that the discussion on metal did not, and more? A discussion of one is a discussion of them both - same article, neh? For charcoal/coke, a quick line of clarification is sufficient. Is there enough here for its own article? --[[User:Albedo\|Albedo]] 17:50, 16 September 2009 (UTC)		This (now stub) article used to redirect to [[metal]]. Isn't bar:metal like quiver:bolt, something that goes hand in hand. What does a separate article give that the discussion on metal did not, and more? A discussion of one is a discussion of them both - same article, neh? For charcoal/coke, a quick line of clarification is sufficient. Is there enough here for its own article? --[[User:Albedo\|Albedo]] 17:50, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
	:I personally found it rather confusing that when coal, ash, potash, pearlash, and soap refer to the fact that they come in bars, they redirected to [[metal]], which (rightly) makes absolutely no mention of other materials that come in bars. In other words, a stub article is better than no article at all. --[[User:Quietust\|Quietust]] 17:55, 16 September 2009 (UTC)		:I personally found it rather confusing that when coal, ash, potash, pearlash, and soap refer to the fact that they come in bars, they redirected to [[metal]], which (rightly) makes absolutely no mention of other materials that come in bars. In other words, a stub article is better than no article at all. --[[User:Quietust\|Quietust]] 17:55, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
		+	::I've just extended the page somewhat, mostly mirroring the layout of [[block]]. --[[User:Quietust\|Quietust]] 18:12, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
   this really deserves its own page
 This (now stub) article used to redirect to [[metal]].  Isn't bar:metal like quiver:bolt, something that goes hand in hand.  What does a separate article give that the discussion on metal did not, and more?  A discussion of one is a discussion of them both - same article, neh? For charcoal/coke, a quick line of clarification is sufficient. Is there enough here for its own article? --[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 17:50, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
-*I personally found it rather confusing that when coal, ash, potash, pearlash, and soap refer to the fact that they come in bars, they redirected to [[metal]], which (rightly) makes absolutely no mention of other materials that come in bars. --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 17:55, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
+:I personally found it rather confusing that when coal, ash, potash, pearlash, and soap refer to the fact that they come in bars, they redirected to [[metal]], which (rightly) makes absolutely no mention of other materials that come in bars. In other words, a stub article is better than no article at all. --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 17:55, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:55, 16 September 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	this really deserves its own page		this really deserves its own page
	This (now stub) article used to redirect to [[metal]]. Isn't bar:metal like quiver:bolt, something that goes hand in hand. What does a separate article give that the discussion on metal did not, and more? A discussion of one is a discussion of them both - same article, neh? For charcoal/coke, a quick line of clarification is sufficient. Is there enough here for its own article? --[[User:Albedo\|Albedo]] 17:50, 16 September 2009 (UTC)		This (now stub) article used to redirect to [[metal]]. Isn't bar:metal like quiver:bolt, something that goes hand in hand. What does a separate article give that the discussion on metal did not, and more? A discussion of one is a discussion of them both - same article, neh? For charcoal/coke, a quick line of clarification is sufficient. Is there enough here for its own article? --[[User:Albedo\|Albedo]] 17:50, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
		+	*I personally found it rather confusing that when coal, ash, potash, pearlash, and soap refer to the fact that they come in bars, they redirected to [[metal]], which (rightly) makes absolutely no mention of other materials that come in bars. --[[User:Quietust\|Quietust]] 17:55, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:52, 16 September 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:

	this really deserves its own page		this really deserves its own page
−	This (now stub) article used to redirect to [[metal]]. Isn't bar:metal like quiver:bolt, something that goes hand in hand. What does a separate article give that the discussion on metal did not, and more? A discussion of one is a discussion of them both - same article, neh?--[[User:Albedo\|Albedo]] 17:50, 16 September 2009 (UTC)	+	This (now stub) article used to redirect to [[metal]]. Isn't bar:metal like quiver:bolt, something that goes hand in hand. What does a separate article give that the discussion on metal did not, and more? A discussion of one is a discussion of them both - same article, neh? For charcoal/coke, a quick line of clarification is sufficient. Is there enough here for its own article? --[[User:Albedo\|Albedo]] 17:50, 16 September 2009 (UTC)