Talk:Orthogonal - Revision history

Burlingk at 03:21, 17 July 2010

2010-07-17T03:21:07Z

Burlingk at 03:19, 17 July 2010

2010-07-17T03:19:07Z

Burlingk at 03:18, 17 July 2010

2010-07-17T03:18:52Z

Bouchart: Created page with 'Is this page necessary? I don't think it says anything that can't be said in the relevant articles. --~~~~'

2010-07-12T03:18:35Z

Created page with 'Is this page necessary? I don't think it says anything that can't be said in the relevant articles. --~~~~'

New page

Is this page necessary? I don't think it says anything that can't be said in the relevant articles. --[[User:Bouchart|Bouchart]] 03:18, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:21, 17 July 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Is this page necessary? I don't think it says anything that can't be said in the relevant articles. --[[User:Bouchart\|Bouchart]] 03:18, 12 July 2010 (UTC)		Is this page necessary? I don't think it says anything that can't be said in the relevant articles. --[[User:Bouchart\|Bouchart]] 03:18, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
−	::I would say that it depends. How many relevant articles are there? If it applies to more than two or three articles, then saying it in one place can be a good thing. That way, instead of defining it like twenty times, they can just say [[Orthogonal]] and move on to the article as a whole, adding four strokes instead of four hundred. --[[User:Burlingk\|Burlingk]] 03:18, 17 July 2010 (UTC)	+	::I would say that it depends. How many relevant articles are there? If it applies to more than two or three articles, then saying it in one place can be a good thing. That way, instead of defining it like twenty times, they can just say <nowiki>[[</nowiki>[[Orthogonal]]<nowiki>]]</nowiki> and move on to the article as a whole, adding four strokes instead of four hundred. --[[User:Burlingk\|Burlingk]] 03:18, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:19, 17 July 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Is this page necessary? I don't think it says anything that can't be said in the relevant articles. --[[User:Bouchart\|Bouchart]] 03:18, 12 July 2010 (UTC)		Is this page necessary? I don't think it says anything that can't be said in the relevant articles. --[[User:Bouchart\|Bouchart]] 03:18, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
−	::I would say that it depends. How many relevant articles are there? If it applies to more than two or three articles, then saying it in one place can be a good thing. That way, instead of defining it like twenty times, they can just say [[Orthogonal]] and move on to the article as a whole, adding four strokes instead of four hundred. --[[User:Burlingk\|Burlingk]] 03:18, 17 July 2010 (UTC)	+	::I would say that it depends. How many relevant articles are there? If it applies to more than two or three articles, then saying it in one place can be a good thing. That way, instead of defining it like twenty times, they can just say [[Orthogonal]] and move on to the article as a whole, adding four strokes instead of four hundred. --[[User:Burlingk\|Burlingk]] 03:18, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:18, 17 July 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Is this page necessary? I don't think it says anything that can't be said in the relevant articles. --[[User:Bouchart\|Bouchart]] 03:18, 12 July 2010 (UTC)		Is this page necessary? I don't think it says anything that can't be said in the relevant articles. --[[User:Bouchart\|Bouchart]] 03:18, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
		+	::I would say that it depends. How many relevant articles are there? If it applies to more than two or three articles, then saying it in one place can be a good thing. That way, instead of defining it like twenty times, they can just say [[Orthogonal]] and move on to the article as a whole, adding four strokes instead of four hundred. --[[User:Burlingk\|Burlingk]] 03:18, 17 July 2010 (UTC)