User talk:Bronzebeard - Revision history

Bronzebeard at 22:11, 26 July 2012

2012-07-26T22:11:33Z

VengefulDonut: /* Err */

2010-05-01T13:50:38Z

Err

VengefulDonut: /* Err */

2010-05-01T13:29:44Z

Err

VengefulDonut: /* Err */ new section

2010-05-01T07:27:09Z

Err: new section

Eagle0600: /* Kobolds */ new section

2010-04-11T11:46:21Z

Kobolds: new section

Bronzebeard: /* Gametext? */

2009-09-13T21:58:46Z

Gametext?

Rowenlemmings: /* Gametext? */

2009-09-13T21:46:08Z

Gametext?

Bronzebeard: /* Gametext? */

2009-09-13T21:42:03Z

Gametext?

Bronzebeard: /* Gametext? */

2009-09-13T21:41:50Z

Gametext?

Rowenlemmings: /* Gametext? */ new section

2009-09-13T20:46:46Z

Gametext?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:11, 26 July 2012
Line 31:		Line 31:

	:::Hah. I've to thank you a second time! I'm, with all due honesty, a noob at wiki editing (starting... just yesterday). By the way, thank you<sup>(2)</sup>. --[[User:Bronzebeard\|Bronzebeard]] 21:58, 13 September 2009 (UTC)		:::Hah. I've to thank you a second time! I'm, with all due honesty, a noob at wiki editing (starting... just yesterday). By the way, thank you<sup>(2)</sup>. --[[User:Bronzebeard\|Bronzebeard]] 21:58, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
−
−	~~== Kobolds ==~~
−
−	~~The Kobold description fit exactly with the raw files. Why did you change it? --[[User:Eagle0600\|Eagle0600]] 11:46, 11 April 2010 (UTC)~~
−
−	~~== Err ==~~
−
−	It seems that you are so interested in defending homosexuality that you have misinterpreted my expression of an opinion on one subject as an invitation for you to tell me yours on a different one. That wasn't my intention at all, but now that we've arrived, let's see where we are. <br>
−	Here you've left an argument at my doorstep about something it seems you want to convince me of. However, there's is a problem with it. You're relying on my belief in your authority on the subject, which you've made no effort to establish. In fact, your use of jargon in an non-specific way has only damaged the image of your expertise in my mind. Also, "prenatal sexual transition" with quotes has 0 hits on google, so my faith in your ability to use your own jargon correctly is also shaky. <br>
−	We have a problem, then. At this point I won't be willing to just take you at your word and I don't think I'm interested enough to verify the validity of an article on the subject if you were to find one. I think these are going to be obstacles for you. So now what? [[User:VengefulDonut\|VengefulDonut]] 07:27, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
−
−	~~:I think you misunderstood my intent. I am not unhappy with you. There is no need for you to apologize. :P [[User:VengefulDonut\|VengefulDonut]] 13:29, 1 May 2010 (UTC)~~
−
−	::Also, my questioning of what you know was not intended as a personal attack. I was pointing out a necessary step in the type of argument you are making. I am a math student, and I have been trained to make the opponent work as hard possible in an argument. I was going after the foundation of your ethos-style argument to try to make you switch to switch to a strictly logical one, which is something I'm much more comfortable with. [[User:VengefulDonut\|VengefulDonut]] 13:50, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:50, 1 May 2010
Line 42:		Line 42:
	We have a problem, then. At this point I won't be willing to just take you at your word and I don't think I'm interested enough to verify the validity of an article on the subject if you were to find one. I think these are going to be obstacles for you. So now what? [[User:VengefulDonut\|VengefulDonut]] 07:27, 1 May 2010 (UTC)		We have a problem, then. At this point I won't be willing to just take you at your word and I don't think I'm interested enough to verify the validity of an article on the subject if you were to find one. I think these are going to be obstacles for you. So now what? [[User:VengefulDonut\|VengefulDonut]] 07:27, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

−	:I think you misunderstood my intent. I am not unhappy with you :P [[User:VengefulDonut\|VengefulDonut]] 13:29, 1 May 2010 (UTC)	+	:I think you misunderstood my intent. I am not unhappy with you. There is no need for you to apologize. :P [[User:VengefulDonut\|VengefulDonut]] 13:29, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	::Also, my questioning of what you know was not intended as a personal attack. I was pointing out a necessary step in the type of argument you are making. I am a math student, and I have been trained to make the opponent work as hard possible in an argument. I was going after the foundation of your ethos-style argument to try to make you switch to switch to a strictly logical one, which is something I'm much more comfortable with. [[User:VengefulDonut\|VengefulDonut]] 13:50, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:29, 1 May 2010
Line 41:		Line 41:
	Here you've left an argument at my doorstep about something it seems you want to convince me of. However, there's is a problem with it. You're relying on my belief in your authority on the subject, which you've made no effort to establish. In fact, your use of jargon in an non-specific way has only damaged the image of your expertise in my mind. Also, "prenatal sexual transition" with quotes has 0 hits on google, so my faith in your ability to use your own jargon correctly is also shaky. <br>		Here you've left an argument at my doorstep about something it seems you want to convince me of. However, there's is a problem with it. You're relying on my belief in your authority on the subject, which you've made no effort to establish. In fact, your use of jargon in an non-specific way has only damaged the image of your expertise in my mind. Also, "prenatal sexual transition" with quotes has 0 hits on google, so my faith in your ability to use your own jargon correctly is also shaky. <br>
	We have a problem, then. At this point I won't be willing to just take you at your word and I don't think I'm interested enough to verify the validity of an article on the subject if you were to find one. I think these are going to be obstacles for you. So now what? [[User:VengefulDonut\|VengefulDonut]] 07:27, 1 May 2010 (UTC)		We have a problem, then. At this point I won't be willing to just take you at your word and I don't think I'm interested enough to verify the validity of an article on the subject if you were to find one. I think these are going to be obstacles for you. So now what? [[User:VengefulDonut\|VengefulDonut]] 07:27, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	:I think you misunderstood my intent. I am not unhappy with you :P [[User:VengefulDonut\|VengefulDonut]] 13:29, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:27, 1 May 2010
Line 35:		Line 35:

	The Kobold description fit exactly with the raw files. Why did you change it? --[[User:Eagle0600\|Eagle0600]] 11:46, 11 April 2010 (UTC)		The Kobold description fit exactly with the raw files. Why did you change it? --[[User:Eagle0600\|Eagle0600]] 11:46, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Err ==
		+
		+	It seems that you are so interested in defending homosexuality that you have misinterpreted my expression of an opinion on one subject as an invitation for you to tell me yours on a different one. That wasn't my intention at all, but now that we've arrived, let's see where we are. <br>
		+	Here you've left an argument at my doorstep about something it seems you want to convince me of. However, there's is a problem with it. You're relying on my belief in your authority on the subject, which you've made no effort to establish. In fact, your use of jargon in an non-specific way has only damaged the image of your expertise in my mind. Also, "prenatal sexual transition" with quotes has 0 hits on google, so my faith in your ability to use your own jargon correctly is also shaky. <br>
		+	We have a problem, then. At this point I won't be willing to just take you at your word and I don't think I'm interested enough to verify the validity of an article on the subject if you were to find one. I think these are going to be obstacles for you. So now what? [[User:VengefulDonut\|VengefulDonut]] 07:27, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:46, 11 April 2010
Line 31:		Line 31:

	:::Hah. I've to thank you a second time! I'm, with all due honesty, a noob at wiki editing (starting... just yesterday). By the way, thank you<sup>(2)</sup>. --[[User:Bronzebeard\|Bronzebeard]] 21:58, 13 September 2009 (UTC)		:::Hah. I've to thank you a second time! I'm, with all due honesty, a noob at wiki editing (starting... just yesterday). By the way, thank you<sup>(2)</sup>. --[[User:Bronzebeard\|Bronzebeard]] 21:58, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Kobolds ==
		+
		+	The Kobold description fit exactly with the raw files. Why did you change it? --[[User:Eagle0600\|Eagle0600]] 11:46, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:58, 13 September 2009
Line 29:		Line 29:

	::Fixed. That <nowiki><!--</nowiki>''text goes here''<nowiki>--></nowiki> markup is a comment, so you'd left an open begin-comment markup at the end of the template. I deleted the last <nowiki><!--</nowiki> and it shows the rest of the page now. --[[User:Rowenlemmings\|Rowenlemmings]] 21:46, 13 September 2009 (UTC)		::Fixed. That <nowiki><!--</nowiki>''text goes here''<nowiki>--></nowiki> markup is a comment, so you'd left an open begin-comment markup at the end of the template. I deleted the last <nowiki><!--</nowiki> and it shows the rest of the page now. --[[User:Rowenlemmings\|Rowenlemmings]] 21:46, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	:::Hah. I've to thank you a second time! I'm, with all due honesty, a noob at wiki editing (starting... just yesterday). By the way, thank you<sup>(2)</sup>. --[[User:Bronzebeard\|Bronzebeard]] 21:58, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:46, 13 September 2009
Line 27:		Line 27:

	:Why, thank you! After fiddling around with the code for a bit, I think I got it ([[User:Bronzebeard]]). However, it's proven a little trickier than what I've cracked up; it won't let me begin any further header, below (maybe I'm missing some end statement to it, or something >.>). --[[User:Bronzebeard\|Bronzebeard]] 21:42, 13 September 2009 (UTC)		:Why, thank you! After fiddling around with the code for a bit, I think I got it ([[User:Bronzebeard]]). However, it's proven a little trickier than what I've cracked up; it won't let me begin any further header, below (maybe I'm missing some end statement to it, or something >.>). --[[User:Bronzebeard\|Bronzebeard]] 21:42, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	::Fixed. That <nowiki><!--</nowiki>''text goes here''<nowiki>--></nowiki> markup is a comment, so you'd left an open begin-comment markup at the end of the template. I deleted the last <nowiki><!--</nowiki> and it shows the rest of the page now. --[[User:Rowenlemmings\|Rowenlemmings]] 21:46, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:42, 13 September 2009
Line 26:		Line 26:
	Since you've formatted your userpage akin to DF's thoughts and preferences, might I direct you to [[Template:Gametext]]? I spent some time fooling around with this last night to get my userpage looking just so. --[[User:Rowenlemmings\|Rowenlemmings]] 20:46, 13 September 2009 (UTC)		Since you've formatted your userpage akin to DF's thoughts and preferences, might I direct you to [[Template:Gametext]]? I spent some time fooling around with this last night to get my userpage looking just so. --[[User:Rowenlemmings\|Rowenlemmings]] 20:46, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

−	:Why, thank you! After fiddling around with the code for a bit, I think I got it ([[User:Bronzebeard]]). However, it's proven a little trickier than what I've cracked up; it won't let me begin any further header, below (maybe I'm missing some end statement to it, or something >.>).	+	:Why, thank you! After fiddling around with the code for a bit, I think I got it ([[User:Bronzebeard]]). However, it's proven a little trickier than what I've cracked up; it won't let me begin any further header, below (maybe I'm missing some end statement to it, or something >.>). --[[User:Bronzebeard\|Bronzebeard]] 21:42, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:41, 13 September 2009
Line 25:		Line 25:

	Since you've formatted your userpage akin to DF's thoughts and preferences, might I direct you to [[Template:Gametext]]? I spent some time fooling around with this last night to get my userpage looking just so. --[[User:Rowenlemmings\|Rowenlemmings]] 20:46, 13 September 2009 (UTC)		Since you've formatted your userpage akin to DF's thoughts and preferences, might I direct you to [[Template:Gametext]]? I spent some time fooling around with this last night to get my userpage looking just so. --[[User:Rowenlemmings\|Rowenlemmings]] 20:46, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	:Why, thank you! After fiddling around with the code for a bit, I think I got it ([[User:Bronzebeard]]). However, it's proven a little trickier than what I've cracked up; it won't let me begin any further header, below (maybe I'm missing some end statement to it, or something >.>).

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:46, 13 September 2009
Line 21:		Line 21:

	::NP, all good - I made similar mistakes w/ my first editing efforts, so I'm hardly in a position to stress (at least, not without being a complete hypocrite, ahem). In some (role playing) games, a "Winter Wolf" is ''quite'' unnatural - a glance at the game files shows it's just a wolf in cold weather climes, unlike, say, [[fire imp]]s, [[iron man\|iron men]] or [[grimeling]]s, which have more than one "unnatural" trick up their sleeve. Skim over [[creature token]]s for a bit more info on those tags and what they mean. --[[User:Albedo\|Albedo]] 20:18, 13 September 2009 (UTC)		::NP, all good - I made similar mistakes w/ my first editing efforts, so I'm hardly in a position to stress (at least, not without being a complete hypocrite, ahem). In some (role playing) games, a "Winter Wolf" is ''quite'' unnatural - a glance at the game files shows it's just a wolf in cold weather climes, unlike, say, [[fire imp]]s, [[iron man\|iron men]] or [[grimeling]]s, which have more than one "unnatural" trick up their sleeve. Skim over [[creature token]]s for a bit more info on those tags and what they mean. --[[User:Albedo\|Albedo]] 20:18, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Gametext? ==
		+
		+	Since you've formatted your userpage akin to DF's thoughts and preferences, might I direct you to [[Template:Gametext]]? I spent some time fooling around with this last night to get my userpage looking just so. --[[User:Rowenlemmings\|Rowenlemmings]] 20:46, 13 September 2009 (UTC)