User talk:Gnarker - Revision history

Gnarker: /* Power, water & transfer */

2009-07-08T16:30:40Z

Power, water & transfer

Albedo: /* Power, water & transfer */ new section

2009-06-04T03:08:57Z

Power, water & transfer: new section

Gnarker: /* Mispost in Floodgates */

2009-06-03T15:37:12Z

Mispost in Floodgates

Smjjames: Putting my mispost on the userpage to usertalk.

2009-06-03T15:31:24Z

Putting my mispost on the userpage to usertalk.

Gnarker: /* Stone & veins */

2009-05-29T17:42:19Z

Stone & veins

Gnarker: /* Stone & veins */

2009-05-29T17:41:23Z

Stone & veins

Gnarker: /* Stone & veins */

2009-05-29T17:40:42Z

Stone & veins

Albedo: /* Stone & veins */

2009-05-29T17:35:57Z

Stone & veins

Gnarker: /* Stone & veins */

2009-05-29T17:19:52Z

Stone & veins

Gnarker: /* Stone & veins */

2009-05-29T17:19:19Z

Stone & veins

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:30, 8 July 2009
Line 17:		Line 17:

	Hey - what exactly are you trying to say here? Because it's not really a sentence, and what is there can be read several different ways, and I didn't want to guess what your intent was. "Enough water" can mean flow or volume, and the 2nd part has no verb. (I understand that English is not your 1st language - this is a complex sentence structure, idioms can be tricky (more "art" than formula), and I feel it's close - but the more complex, the more problems can appear. I've seen native speakers who cannot express themselves as well as you, so no worries there - we'll get it.)--[[User:Albedo\|Albedo]] 03:08, 4 June 2009 (UTC)		Hey - what exactly are you trying to say here? Because it's not really a sentence, and what is there can be read several different ways, and I didn't want to guess what your intent was. "Enough water" can mean flow or volume, and the 2nd part has no verb. (I understand that English is not your 1st language - this is a complex sentence structure, idioms can be tricky (more "art" than formula), and I feel it's close - but the more complex, the more problems can appear. I've seen native speakers who cannot express themselves as well as you, so no worries there - we'll get it.)--[[User:Albedo\|Albedo]] 03:08, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	With enough water, power can be transferred trough channels, screw pumps and water wheels, too. Just pump the Water to the power destination with the pump and gain power from the flow via water wheels there.
		+
		+	Better? --[[User:Gnarker\|Gnarker]] 18.30, 8 July 2009 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:08, 4 June 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:

	:Actually it´s around 220-230. But it´s regardless. To 'at least', i meant, in the most cases it´s 'that number or more'. And i lookedfor the meaning of average after i wrote that. [[User:Gnarker\|Gnarker]] 19:40 CEST/17:40 UTC, 29 May 2009		:Actually it´s around 220-230. But it´s regardless. To 'at least', i meant, in the most cases it´s 'that number or more'. And i lookedfor the meaning of average after i wrote that. [[User:Gnarker\|Gnarker]] 19:40 CEST/17:40 UTC, 29 May 2009
		+
		+	== Power, water & transfer ==
		+
		+	With enough water, power can be transferred trough screw pumps, said water moving through a channel
		+	and one or more water wheels at the destination less power-consuming over great distances, too.
		+
		+	Hey - what exactly are you trying to say here? Because it's not really a sentence, and what is there can be read several different ways, and I didn't want to guess what your intent was. "Enough water" can mean flow or volume, and the 2nd part has no verb. (I understand that English is not your 1st language - this is a complex sentence structure, idioms can be tricky (more "art" than formula), and I feel it's close - but the more complex, the more problems can appear. I've seen native speakers who cannot express themselves as well as you, so no worries there - we'll get it.)--[[User:Albedo\|Albedo]] 03:08, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:37, 3 June 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:

	:Actually it´s around 220-230. But it´s regardless. To 'at least', i meant, in the most cases it´s 'that number or more'. And i lookedfor the meaning of average after i wrote that. [[User:Gnarker\|Gnarker]] 19:40 CEST/17:40 UTC, 29 May 2009		:Actually it´s around 220-230. But it´s regardless. To 'at least', i meant, in the most cases it´s 'that number or more'. And i lookedfor the meaning of average after i wrote that. [[User:Gnarker\|Gnarker]] 19:40 CEST/17:40 UTC, 29 May 2009
−
−	~~== Mispost in Floodgates ==~~
−
−	I'm guessing you meant to post in the discussion section of that article rather than the article page. To answer that, anything standing on or otherwise occupying the floodgate tile when it's open will stop it from closing. --[[User:Smjjames\|Smjjames]] 14:22, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:31, 3 June 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:

	:Actually it´s around 220-230. But it´s regardless. To 'at least', i meant, in the most cases it´s 'that number or more'. And i lookedfor the meaning of average after i wrote that. [[User:Gnarker\|Gnarker]] 19:40 CEST/17:40 UTC, 29 May 2009		:Actually it´s around 220-230. But it´s regardless. To 'at least', i meant, in the most cases it´s 'that number or more'. And i lookedfor the meaning of average after i wrote that. [[User:Gnarker\|Gnarker]] 19:40 CEST/17:40 UTC, 29 May 2009
		+
		+	== Mispost in Floodgates ==
		+
		+	I'm guessing you meant to post in the discussion section of that article rather than the article page. To answer that, anything standing on or otherwise occupying the floodgate tile when it's open will stop it from closing. --[[User:Smjjames\|Smjjames]] 14:22, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:42, 29 May 2009
Line 9:		Line 9:
	::As to the vein... if you say so. But your vein could be two veins that are end-to-end. 200 seems very, ''very'' large for one vein - but I'll admit I don't know what the limit is, or if there is one.--[[User:Albedo\|Albedo]] 17:35, 29 May 2009 (UTC)		::As to the vein... if you say so. But your vein could be two veins that are end-to-end. 200 seems very, ''very'' large for one vein - but I'll admit I don't know what the limit is, or if there is one.--[[User:Albedo\|Albedo]] 17:35, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

−	:Actually it´s around 220-230. To 'at least', i meant, in the most cases it´s 'that number or more'. And i lookedfor the meaning of average after i wrote that. [[User:Gnarker\|Gnarker]] 19:40 CEST/17:40 UTC, 29 May 2009	+	:Actually it´s around 220-230. But it´s regardless. To 'at least', i meant, in the most cases it´s 'that number or more'. And i lookedfor the meaning of average after i wrote that. [[User:Gnarker\|Gnarker]] 19:40 CEST/17:40 UTC, 29 May 2009

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:41, 29 May 2009
Line 9:		Line 9:
	::As to the vein... if you say so. But your vein could be two veins that are end-to-end. 200 seems very, ''very'' large for one vein - but I'll admit I don't know what the limit is, or if there is one.--[[User:Albedo\|Albedo]] 17:35, 29 May 2009 (UTC)		::As to the vein... if you say so. But your vein could be two veins that are end-to-end. 200 seems very, ''very'' large for one vein - but I'll admit I don't know what the limit is, or if there is one.--[[User:Albedo\|Albedo]] 17:35, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

−	:Actually it´s around 220-230. To 'at least', i meant, in the most cases it´s 'that number or more'. And i ~~looked~~ the meaning of average after i wrote that. [[User:Gnarker\|Gnarker]] 19:40 CEST/17:40 UTC, 29 May 2009	+	:Actually it´s around 220-230. To 'at least', i meant, in the most cases it´s 'that number or more'. And i lookedfor the meaning of average after i wrote that. [[User:Gnarker\|Gnarker]] 19:40 CEST/17:40 UTC, 29 May 2009

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:40, 29 May 2009
Line 8:		Line 8:
	::German/English can be close but not always. If you say "at least", that means the average is "that number ''or more''" - so, I'm asking if you've seen evidence that the average "could be more", which is what your statement implies. If not, then it should be reverted to just "average about 100".		::German/English can be close but not always. If you say "at least", that means the average is "that number ''or more''" - so, I'm asking if you've seen evidence that the average "could be more", which is what your statement implies. If not, then it should be reverted to just "average about 100".
	::As to the vein... if you say so. But your vein could be two veins that are end-to-end. 200 seems very, ''very'' large for one vein - but I'll admit I don't know what the limit is, or if there is one.--[[User:Albedo\|Albedo]] 17:35, 29 May 2009 (UTC)		::As to the vein... if you say so. But your vein could be two veins that are end-to-end. 200 seems very, ''very'' large for one vein - but I'll admit I don't know what the limit is, or if there is one.--[[User:Albedo\|Albedo]] 17:35, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	:Actually it´s around 220-230. To 'at least', i meant, in the most cases it´s 'that number or more'. And i looked the meaning of average after i wrote that. [[User:Gnarker\|Gnarker]] 19:40 CEST/17:40 UTC, 29 May 2009

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
   (Veins) average at least 100 stones each, but veins with over 200 stones have been found, too.
 Hi. What makes you say that the average is ''over'' 100 stones? And are you sure your 200 stone vein was not two veins combined, as shown on the main [[vein]]s page?--[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 15:35, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
-[[User:Gnarker|Gnarker]] 19:18 CEST/17:18 UTC, 29 May 2009
+:At first, i have never been saying, that the average is over 100 stones. But frankly, i don´t know, how you say that in English, but i translated, what i would say in German. And the 200 stones vein looks quite like one for me.[[User:Gnarker|Gnarker]] 19:18 CEST/17:18 UTC, 29 May 2009

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 Hi. What makes you say that the average is ''over'' 100 stones? And are you sure your 200 stone vein was not two veins combined, as shown on the main [[vein]]s page?--[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 15:35, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-At first, i have never been saying, that the average is over 100 stones. Frankly, i don´t know, how you say that in English, but i translated, what i would say in German. And the 200 stones vein looks quite like one for me:
+At first, i have never been saying, that the average is over 100 stones. Frankly, i don´t know, how you say that in English, but i translated, what i would say in German. And the 200 stones vein looks quite like one for me.
 [[User:Gnarker|Gnarker]] 19:18 CEST/17:18 UTC, 29 May 2009