v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "40d Talk:Gray squirrel"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (moved Talk:Broken/40d\x3aGray squirrel to 40d Talk:Gray squirrel: Fixing talk page name (307/738)) |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:"Big" Animals show up fine. I now wonder how useful my contribution is on this page..might only be interesting if the elves only bring a specific set of vermin, not just any. --[[User:Höhlenschreck|Höhlenschreck]] 23:50, 27 May 2009 (UTC) | :"Big" Animals show up fine. I now wonder how useful my contribution is on this page..might only be interesting if the elves only bring a specific set of vermin, not just any. --[[User:Höhlenschreck|Höhlenschreck]] 23:50, 27 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::Saw that too, so it's nothing new (to many, if not to me, ahem- - my bad). But as written it is confusing - seems specific to gray squirrels. I'd suggest removing it from here, and adding it to vermin in general, and maybe with just a comment or link on the specific vermin pages where it is applicable. Add a comment/qualifier about "some types" or "(unknown?)" or something. Might be "all non-evil vermin" - who knows?--[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 00:08, 28 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::Edited a bit, but I agree we should find a better solution. For now it doesn't hurt like that either. A list of 'elvable' vermin on the vermin page sounds good (but we really need a new game release so we can move from elven crap to real news ;) ). --[[User:Höhlenschreck|Höhlenschreck]] 00:37, 28 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::Heh, yup. Moss bwaynoh. Agreed - If you haven't noticed, I'm a big fan of tables over stub articles and redundant explanations in parallel items. Maybe use the forum for more input - go for it!--[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 01:05, 28 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::::Lets continue the disc. at [[vermin]]? --[[User:Höhlenschreck|Höhlenschreck]] 10:40, 28 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 21:47, 8 March 2010
Hidden in cages?[edit]
Elves may bring them too, hidden in seemingly empty cages.
Really? First time I've heard anything remotely like this - could it be a bug?--Albedo 23:18, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- Well, i was intentionally fuzzy in the wording. My bad. As far as i recall in former versions they brought vermin in small traps (hadnt played in quite a while), but now they bring them in "normal" cages and then vermin are only visible via view or, once bought, on the stockpile. Out of 7 cages i bought from the elves in 40d 3 had a (tame) vermin in it --Höhlenschreck 23:37, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- Confirmed.--Zchris13 23:44, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- And the cages appear empty? Hmmm, haven't run into that yet, but haven't traded with elves that much - got a grizzly once, saw that no problem. (The guts of 40d are 100% identical to 40d11, untouched - the only thing changed is how the game communicates w/ the hardware - in theory, faster).--Albedo 23:47, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- Confirmed.--Zchris13 23:44, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- Just found this: [1]
- "Big" Animals show up fine. I now wonder how useful my contribution is on this page..might only be interesting if the elves only bring a specific set of vermin, not just any. --Höhlenschreck 23:50, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- Saw that too, so it's nothing new (to many, if not to me, ahem- - my bad). But as written it is confusing - seems specific to gray squirrels. I'd suggest removing it from here, and adding it to vermin in general, and maybe with just a comment or link on the specific vermin pages where it is applicable. Add a comment/qualifier about "some types" or "(unknown?)" or something. Might be "all non-evil vermin" - who knows?--Albedo 00:08, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Edited a bit, but I agree we should find a better solution. For now it doesn't hurt like that either. A list of 'elvable' vermin on the vermin page sounds good (but we really need a new game release so we can move from elven crap to real news ;) ). --Höhlenschreck 00:37, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Heh, yup. Moss bwaynoh. Agreed - If you haven't noticed, I'm a big fan of tables over stub articles and redundant explanations in parallel items. Maybe use the forum for more input - go for it!--Albedo 01:05, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Lets continue the disc. at vermin? --Höhlenschreck 10:40, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Heh, yup. Moss bwaynoh. Agreed - If you haven't noticed, I'm a big fan of tables over stub articles and redundant explanations in parallel items. Maybe use the forum for more input - go for it!--Albedo 01:05, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Edited a bit, but I agree we should find a better solution. For now it doesn't hurt like that either. A list of 'elvable' vermin on the vermin page sounds good (but we really need a new game release so we can move from elven crap to real news ;) ). --Höhlenschreck 00:37, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Saw that too, so it's nothing new (to many, if not to me, ahem- - my bad). But as written it is confusing - seems specific to gray squirrels. I'd suggest removing it from here, and adding it to vermin in general, and maybe with just a comment or link on the specific vermin pages where it is applicable. Add a comment/qualifier about "some types" or "(unknown?)" or something. Might be "all non-evil vermin" - who knows?--Albedo 00:08, 28 May 2009 (UTC)