- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
Difference between revisions of "40d Talk:Dam"
m |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Deletionists here, too? Why would you want to ''decrease'' the amount of information regarding Dwarf Fortress? I can see an argument for better organization, moves, or whatever, but certainly not deleting it. And here I had made an account to create an article for how to build an aqueduct from a river to a well or series of wells using locks. --[[User:Hilscher|Hilscher]] 14:25, 15 October 2008 (EDT) | Deletionists here, too? Why would you want to ''decrease'' the amount of information regarding Dwarf Fortress? I can see an argument for better organization, moves, or whatever, but certainly not deleting it. And here I had made an account to create an article for how to build an aqueduct from a river to a well or series of wells using locks. --[[User:Hilscher|Hilscher]] 14:25, 15 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Which I'm now discouraged to do after seeing this, I just realized. Why put in the work if it will just get deleted? Deletionism hurts everyone. --[[User:Hilscher|Hilscher]] 14:28, 15 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
== Ice Damming == | == Ice Damming == | ||
Revision as of 18:28, 15 October 2008
This article should be deleted for the same reason "Rock chute" was. It is an application of the material given in the wiki. --Savok 00:06, 6 November 2007 (EST)
Maybe - but where else is someone going to find specific information about this? Browsing through the map archive will only show basic dam construction and give no specific details. Isn't it basically the same as Design strategies? --Decanter 00:14, 6 November 2007 (EST)
Before looking at this page, I had no idea we could make dams and such... --Eagle of Fire 19:07, 12 November 2007 (EST)
If nothing else we should save the information about excavating the river tiles, I had no idea you needed to do this and I'm sure most people wouldn't either. --BurnedToast 09:54, 17 November 2007 (EST)
This article should definitely be kept. It does not belong with design strategies, and provides useful information. There is no reason to delete it. I agree with Eagle of Fire. Nate879 16:37, 9 February 2008 (EST)
Deletionists here, too? Why would you want to decrease the amount of information regarding Dwarf Fortress? I can see an argument for better organization, moves, or whatever, but certainly not deleting it. And here I had made an account to create an article for how to build an aqueduct from a river to a well or series of wells using locks. --Hilscher 14:25, 15 October 2008 (EDT)
- Which I'm now discouraged to do after seeing this, I just realized. Why put in the work if it will just get deleted? Deletionism hurts everyone. --Hilscher 14:28, 15 October 2008 (EDT)
Ice Damming
I'm not sure if I screwed it up in some way, but I dug a channel in the ice, put in 4 floodgates across the river (which is 4 wide) and when it thawed it was not a dam, the water after the floodgates is 4 or 5/7, maybe its cause its a newer version and he added over filling. --Lowlandlord 00:34, 4 August 2008 (EDT) Or never mind, its starting to go dry now, guess I just needed to be patient.