v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "40d Talk:Stone types"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
GrimmSweeper (talk | contribs) |
(It would be useful to include what levels these ores can be found at, if we find there is any regular system for ore placement) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Which way, though? If you look at the designation list, all of this is categorized under "Stone". [[User:GrimmSweeper|GrimmSweeper]] | Which way, though? If you look at the designation list, all of this is categorized under "Stone". [[User:GrimmSweeper|GrimmSweeper]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | It would be useful to include what levels these ores can be found at, if we find there is any regular system for ore placement --[[User:Alc|Alc]] 01:14, 30 October 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 05:14, 30 October 2007
This list should be merged with List of mineral types. --Peristarkawan 21:43, 29 October 2007 (EDT)
Which way, though? If you look at the designation list, all of this is categorized under "Stone". GrimmSweeper
It would be useful to include what levels these ores can be found at, if we find there is any regular system for ore placement --Alc 01:14, 30 October 2007 (EDT)