v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "Dwarf Fortress Wiki talk:Centralized Discussion"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Missing discussions? == | == Missing discussions? == | ||
Are there any important discussions I've missed, or anything you'd like to discussion that you'd like a location to discuss? [[User:Mason11987|Mason]] <sup>([[User talk:Mason11987|T]]-[[Special:Contributions/Mason11987|C]])</sup> 16:58, 23 April 2010 (UTC) | Are there any important discussions I've missed, or anything you'd like to discussion that you'd like a location to discuss? [[User:Mason11987|Mason]] <sup>([[User talk:Mason11987|T]]-[[Special:Contributions/Mason11987|C]])</sup> 16:58, 23 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Will any articles be pruned away or merged? In the jump from 40D to v31 a lot of articles that used to be served well by tables seem to have become their own articles, which really clutters the place up and scatters information all over unfindably. Stones, ores, and gems are the most obvious, they really only need three tables instead of hundreds of articles. --[[User:Corona688|Corona688]] 19:53, 23 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 19:53, 23 April 2010
Thoughts?
Any thoughts on this page? Any potentially useful organizing ideas? Mason (T-C) 16:58, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
- I think this is a great idea. --Briess 17:03, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Missing discussions?
Are there any important discussions I've missed, or anything you'd like to discussion that you'd like a location to discuss? Mason (T-C) 16:58, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
- Will any articles be pruned away or merged? In the jump from 40D to v31 a lot of articles that used to be served well by tables seem to have become their own articles, which really clutters the place up and scatters information all over unfindably. Stones, ores, and gems are the most obvious, they really only need three tables instead of hundreds of articles. --Corona688 19:53, 23 April 2010 (UTC)