v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Creature/is humanoid"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(problem) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:Uh-oh... [[barn owl]]s should definitely not be included in this. The #switch may have been a better way to determine this after all. Thoughts? --{{User:Lethosor/sig}} 00:32, 16 April 2013 (UTC) | :Uh-oh... [[barn owl]]s should definitely not be included in this. The #switch may have been a better way to determine this after all. Thoughts? --{{User:Lethosor/sig}} 00:32, 16 April 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::Looks like a lot of birds use HUMANOID_ARMLESS. On the other hand, so do crab men. I guess we could exclude (armless + 2 wings), but that's awfully hacky. Let's take a step back. What is the purpose of this category? I mean, what attributes of humanoidness do we care about that it's worth making a category for them? We should just check those.--[[User:Zzedar|Zzedar]] ([[User talk:Zzedar|talk]]) 00:54, 16 April 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:54, 16 April 2013
Is there any way to do wildcard matches with DFRawFunctions? I was going to add all the humanoid creature variations (HUMANOID_HOOF, the zillion different numbers of limbs each type can have, etc.), but if there's any way to just search for any body tag that begins "HUMANOID_", that would be infinitely preferable.--Zzedar (talk) 23:55, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
- I couldn't find any creatures that had tags like those, but something like this:
{{#rsplit:{{#df_tagentry:{{/raw}}|BODY|0|1|NOT_HUMANOID}}|_|0}}
- should give you "HUMANOID" or something else, which can then be checked with #ifeq:
{{#ifeq:{{#rsplit:{{#df_tagentry:{{/raw}}|BODY|0|1|NOT_HUMANOID}}|_|0}}|HUMANOID|1|0}}
- Example: Antman - 1, Cat - 0, Ettin - 1
- Implemented. Thanks for the idea. --Lethosor (talk) 00:27, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
- Uh-oh... barn owls should definitely not be included in this. The #switch may have been a better way to determine this after all. Thoughts? --Lethosor (talk) 00:32, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
- Looks like a lot of birds use HUMANOID_ARMLESS. On the other hand, so do crab men. I guess we could exclude (armless + 2 wings), but that's awfully hacky. Let's take a step back. What is the purpose of this category? I mean, what attributes of humanoidness do we care about that it's worth making a category for them? We should just check those.--Zzedar (talk) 00:54, 16 April 2013 (UTC)