v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
  • v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
  • Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.

Difference between revisions of "User talk:Corona688"

From Dwarf Fortress Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 7: Line 7:
 
Sorry about the quote thing, I thought that I had edited that.
 
Sorry about the quote thing, I thought that I had edited that.
 
[[User:i2amroy|i2amroy]]
 
[[User:i2amroy|i2amroy]]
 +
 +
{{Quote Box| '''GGoddamn I am sick of this constant editwarring. If I went around removing everything I didn't think was funny the quotes page would be cut in half, but I try to respect other people's content and acknowlege other people's sense of humor.''' --Corona688, responding to a conversation one month old}}
 +
Go for it. Delete the ones you think suck. If they really are popular they will end up back in there through the [[http://dwarf.lendemaindeveille.com/index.php/Talk:Main_Page/Quote#When_to_add_quotes:|guidelines]]. This idea of letting content sit there, no matter what it is, just because someone else put it there. What kind of results come from that kind of system? [[User:VengefulDonut|VengefulDonut]] 03:54, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:54, 1 July 2009

Minor modifications

You should mark your modifications as minor when adding only a few characters (as was the case in Boatmurdered). MagicGuigz 11:09, 3 October 2008 (EDT)

Sorry, I'll watch that in the future. Corona688 21:31, 3 October 2008 (EDT)

Sorry about the quote thing, I thought that I had edited that. i2amroy

GGoddamn I am sick of this constant editwarring. If I went around removing everything I didn't think was funny the quotes page would be cut in half, but I try to respect other people's content and acknowlege other people's sense of humor. --Corona688, responding to a conversation one month old

Go for it. Delete the ones you think suck. If they really are popular they will end up back in there through the [[1]]. This idea of letting content sit there, no matter what it is, just because someone else put it there. What kind of results come from that kind of system? VengefulDonut 03:54, 1 July 2009 (UTC)