v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Editing 40d Talk:Department of Dwarven Veteran's Affairs
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.
You are editing a page for an older version of Dwarf Fortress ("Main" is the current version, not "40d"). Please make sure you intend to do this. If you are here by mistake, see the current page instead.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Genius! A masterwork idea! [[User:Noctis|Noctis]] 09:49, 11 December 2007 (EST) | Genius! A masterwork idea! [[User:Noctis|Noctis]] 09:49, 11 December 2007 (EST) | ||
− | + | This is destined to be deleted. I'm not sure why anyone goes to the trouble of writing a creative work in this space. Should be moved to the author's page. --[[User:Geofferic|Geofferic]] 19:04, 12 December 2007 (EST) | |
− | + | Hilarious! You should start your own section of these under your author page. A tongue in cheek guide to dwarf fortress. [[User:Calculus|Calculus]] 19:06, 12 December 2007 (EST) | |
− | + | You shoulda seen the old wiki - before the agents of [http://www.wikipedia.org ''poo-taaa-tooo, PO-TA-TO!''] turned up and made it uniformatted. Good example would be discussing the old-skool lumberjack "cutting <s>himself</s> down trees" :P --[[User:Frostedfire|Frostedfire]] 02:48, 14 December 2007 (EST) | |
− | |||
− | + | The author page - that's the one linked to by my signature isn't it? | |
− | |||
− | |||
+ | This fine article and this discussion gave me idea about a "shadow" wiki. For most popular topics - make a default serious article (as is now for most topics) and make a clearly marked, unified style links at the top of some pages to "shadow" variants that would state basically the same things as the original but in a creative tongue in cheek words. Of course only "shadow" article should be allowed to wiki-link to other "shadow" articles.--[[User:Another|Another]] 04:15, 14 December 2007 (EST) | ||
+ | :Not a shadowed wiki, but instead a flavored wiki. It would be as easy as linking to [[Flavor:article]] instead of the normal article. --[[User:Ikkonoishi|Ikkonoishi]] 11:04, 14 December 2007 (EST) | ||
::Or even merely a template like the spoiler template, that simply says "Information on this particular article is meant purely for humor value and should not be taken seriously. (However accurate it may in fact be.)"--[[User:Alfador|Alfador]] 11:28, 14 December 2007 (EST) | ::Or even merely a template like the spoiler template, that simply says "Information on this particular article is meant purely for humor value and should not be taken seriously. (However accurate it may in fact be.)"--[[User:Alfador|Alfador]] 11:28, 14 December 2007 (EST) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |