v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
  • v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
  • Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.

Editing DF2014 Talk:Tree

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.

You are editing a page for an older version of Dwarf Fortress ("Main" is the current version, not "DF2014"). Please make sure you intend to do this. If you are here by mistake, see the current page instead.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 130: Line 130:
 
:::And any locomotion that allows omnidirectional movement, e.g. swimming, flying, and climbing, will allow creatures to move diagonally between the open space (floor) and open space (wall). I will add this to the page as well, but won't go too far in depth about it. This info is more associated with articles such as [[Smoothing]], [[Path]], [[Tile]], etc., and the in-depth explanations should go to there instead. Thanks for bringing this up. I am also going to post some of my additional findings in the bug report page, so check that out. – [[User:Doorkeeper|Doorkeeper]] 14:07, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
 
:::And any locomotion that allows omnidirectional movement, e.g. swimming, flying, and climbing, will allow creatures to move diagonally between the open space (floor) and open space (wall). I will add this to the page as well, but won't go too far in depth about it. This info is more associated with articles such as [[Smoothing]], [[Path]], [[Tile]], etc., and the in-depth explanations should go to there instead. Thanks for bringing this up. I am also going to post some of my additional findings in the bug report page, so check that out. – [[User:Doorkeeper|Doorkeeper]] 14:07, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
  
::::Excellent work! Your diagram is much nicer, and illustrates it exactly. I figured out this quirk many years ago after having a FB path through my main stairway which seemed sealed to me at the time. I suspect something like this is happening in many of the alleged "teleporting FB" bugs. The difference between smooth walls, and constructed walls was new for me though. At least, I assume this is an issue with smooth walls, because this issue doesn't show up on the surface level, even on revealed tiles. Soil and presumably rough rock would not produce empty space in the above situation. --[[User:Struck Down|Struck Down]] ([[User talk:Struck Down|talk]]) 21:31, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
+
::::Excellent work! Your diagram is much nicer, and illustrates it exactly. I figured out this quirk many years ago after having a FB path through my main stairway which seemed sealed to me at the time. I suspect something like this is happening in many of the alleged "teleporting FB" bugs. The difference between smooth walls, and constructed walls was new for me though.
 
 
:::::I never got around to post the findings to the bug report, but {{bug|8383}} has been fixed, so the impossible Z-axis movement part may be fixed. I'm not positive that the floorless smoothed wall was fixed too though, that's most likely a bug on its own. I have yet to confirm the results though, which I will be doing. – [[User:Doorkeeper|Doorkeeper]] 01:25, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
 
 
 
:::::Actually the floorless wall bug may have been fixed too; see {{bug|7127}}. Still need to verify – [[User:Doorkeeper|Doorkeeper]] 02:17, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
 
 
 
== Elven tree quota & subterranean mushroom trees ==
 
 
 
Subterranean mushroom trees still count towards Elven tree quotas, don't they? I'm confused because current wiki pages do not mention this, despite how some older wiki pages suggest as much. For that matter, why doesn't the [[Tree]] page at least mention elven tree quotas in passing?
 
 
 
For example, on [[23a:Elf]] it says, "Although [[Tower-cap|tower-caps]] are giant mushrooms, they are considered trees by the elves and thus are not acceptable." And the [[23a:Tree]] page has a whole section for [[23a:Tree#Elven%5FDiplomats|Elven Diplomats]] which at least mentions elven tree quotas.
 
 
 
Currently, the only mentions of elves on the Tree page is the [[DF2014:Tree#Fruit|Fruit]] sub-section, which says that elves bring fruit to trade, and the [[DF2014:Tree#Growing%5Ftrees|Growing trees]] sub-section, which bemoans that elves fail to understand how new saplings randomly regrow. The latter is a '''loosely implied reference''' to elven tree quotas without explaining it or even using the word "quota". Indeed, it '''seems out of place''' as an in-joke that belongs in a "D for Dwarf" humor sub-section.
 
 
 
Because tree harvesting and the attempted trade of wood products is so important to elf diplomacy, I find the lack of even a mention on this page to be a rather significant oversight. And I '''strongly''' recommend how subterranean mushrooms are counted as "trees" as far as elves are concerned should also be mentioned on the tree page. After all, the wiki is relied upon by new players as a source of information and the lack of this mention would likely lead some to assume otherwise. One might argue that such info only belongs on the [[Elf]] page. '''At the least''', this should be mentioned on the [[Elf]] page, if not both.
 
 
 
If nobody replies to this talk in 2 weeks time, I'll take that as nobody having an objection and as permission to add this info. [[User:Thundercraft|Thundercraft]] ([[User talk:Thundercraft|talk]]) 03:56, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
 
:You're correct in saying this is an oversight with the current pages, yes. Feel free to add this info to whatever pages you think are necessary, you don't need permission to complete pages with factual content. [[User:OluapPlayer|OluapPlayer]] ([[User talk:OluapPlayer|talk]]) 12:33, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
 
 
 
== Merging old and "new" trees ==
 
 
 
So, DF2014 was five years ago, and new trees aren't really new anymore.
 
 
 
Therefore, the lists should be merged like they are on creatures page; one list of aboveground trees and one of underground trees.
 
 
 
The note which file they're in is not entirely useless for modding, but would be far more time-saving on creatures, and should be on individual pages in any case if it is kept at all.
 
 
 
Yay or nay?
 
 
 
[[User:Fleeting Frames|Fleeting Frames]] ([[User talk:Fleeting Frames|talk]]) 20:13, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 
 
 
Yes, do it. [[User:Silverwing235|Silverwing235]] ([[User talk:Silverwing235|talk]]) 10:03, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
 
 
 
Done, and sorted by biome/name [[User:Fleeting Frames|Fleeting Frames]] ([[User talk:Fleeting Frames|talk]]) 10:38, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
 
 
 
== Tree template "align" value ==
 
 
 
I propose any alignment restrictions to be listed under biome column instead, and that the "align" table column removed, like how it isn't present with creatures - currently it only matters for 3 aboveground and zero underground trees.
 
 
 
[[User:Fleeting Frames|Fleeting Frames]] ([[User talk:Fleeting Frames|talk]]) 10:37, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
 

Please note that all contributions to Dwarf Fortress Wiki are considered to be released under the GFDL & MIT (see Dwarf Fortress Wiki:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Please sign comments with ~~~~

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)