v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Editing Dwarf Fortress Wiki:Current events
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
==[http://new.df.magmawiki.com New engine]== | ==[http://new.df.magmawiki.com New engine]== | ||
Possibly might have been nice to put some comments here about the new engine. I hope I'm not just talking to ghosts. | Possibly might have been nice to put some comments here about the new engine. I hope I'm not just talking to ghosts. | ||
Line 21: | Line 18: | ||
but for now I am just throwing up articles as fast as possible... | but for now I am just throwing up articles as fast as possible... | ||
:If we're talking about a new approach to versions, pages, etc, is this ''really'' the right time to double our workload? More, if we have to learn a new code? (Or, two, in my case, ahem.) What exactly are the goals we are hoping to achieve with the wagn engine? I think Briess mentioned "easier for a new User to learn" - do we not have enough users editing now? Many current users are editing because they know the code from other Wiki's - if "everyone" has to learn it anew, new or not, will there be "more" than now? (And this doesn't address the issue of appearance, which I'm still deciding on.)--[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 12:31, 2 March 2010 (UTC) | :If we're talking about a new approach to versions, pages, etc, is this ''really'' the right time to double our workload? More, if we have to learn a new code? (Or, two, in my case, ahem.) What exactly are the goals we are hoping to achieve with the wagn engine? I think Briess mentioned "easier for a new User to learn" - do we not have enough users editing now? Many current users are editing because they know the code from other Wiki's - if "everyone" has to learn it anew, new or not, will there be "more" than now? (And this doesn't address the issue of appearance, which I'm still deciding on.)--[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 12:31, 2 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
− | :: | + | ::I can not state how strongly I feel that this is not a good idea. We do not need to move to another entirely different type of wiki especially when we have a new version being released. In all honesty if this wiki isn't going to exist and it will move to a more inferior version then I'm not going to be a part of it. Not to make it sound like a "threat" but MANY other games function extremely well using wikia.com to host their wiki. If Briess intends to let this wiki die and insists on another wiki software then I'm going to work on starting up a new wiki. Because all the talk on the new wiki seems to imply that the goal is to use that software, I set up [http://dwarf.wikia.com/wiki/Dwarf_Fortress_Wiki DF wiki on Wikia.com]. I don't intend to develop it, but will go that route if this wiki is going to disappear. [[User:Mason11987|Mason]] <sup>([[User talk:Mason11987|T]]-[[Special:Contributions/Mason11987|C]])</sup> 14:58, 4 March 2010 (UTC) |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
==Request for Adminship== | ==Request for Adminship== |