v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Editing v0.34 Talk:Miner
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.
You are editing a page for an older version of Dwarf Fortress ("Main" is the current version, not "v0.34"). Please make sure you intend to do this. If you are here by mistake, see the current page instead.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
My understanding of {{rule|T}} seems to correspond more with HiEv than Timrem. HiEv removed a reference to 34.08 when the current version became 34.09, but Timrem reverted that change, stating that DF2012 needs to cover 34.01 through the present release, which trumps timelessness. Is this the general consensus? I thought that whenever a new version came out, whether it be major or minor, references to previous versions should be removed or updated. The article version template states which version the page refers to, so users have an indicator that changes may have occurred if they are playing an older version, while the [[release information]] page contains the changelogs. I just think that we should be striving to keep the wiki as up-to-date as possible and not have to worry about making distinctions between various versions. --[[User:Cali|Cali]] 02:32, 19 May 2012 (UTC) | My understanding of {{rule|T}} seems to correspond more with HiEv than Timrem. HiEv removed a reference to 34.08 when the current version became 34.09, but Timrem reverted that change, stating that DF2012 needs to cover 34.01 through the present release, which trumps timelessness. Is this the general consensus? I thought that whenever a new version came out, whether it be major or minor, references to previous versions should be removed or updated. The article version template states which version the page refers to, so users have an indicator that changes may have occurred if they are playing an older version, while the [[release information]] page contains the changelogs. I just think that we should be striving to keep the wiki as up-to-date as possible and not have to worry about making distinctions between various versions. --[[User:Cali|Cali]] 02:32, 19 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
:Hmm. If I'm wrong, that's cool. I look at pages such as [[v0.31:Irrigation]] though, where there was a major change during that development period, and it notes how things were both before and after the change, and feel like that's the right way to do things. Rule T, to me, says "keep each namespace relevant only to itself", as in, "don't talk about how things were in 23a if the article is about v0.34". If something changed in v0.34.08 from v0.34.07, though, I don't think timelessness trumps the need to document both versions. People do still play v0.34.07, and the wiki shouldn't just ignore that their experience will be different from those who always keep up-to-date on versions. --[[User:Timrem|timrem]] 02:50, 19 May 2012 (UTC) ''edit to add:'' "references to differences from or similarities to old versions of DF should be reduced and eliminated, and put in the appropriate version page"; imo, this is "the appropriate version page" to be talking about both versions of mining. --[[User:Timrem|timrem]] 02:57, 19 May 2012 (UTC) | :Hmm. If I'm wrong, that's cool. I look at pages such as [[v0.31:Irrigation]] though, where there was a major change during that development period, and it notes how things were both before and after the change, and feel like that's the right way to do things. Rule T, to me, says "keep each namespace relevant only to itself", as in, "don't talk about how things were in 23a if the article is about v0.34". If something changed in v0.34.08 from v0.34.07, though, I don't think timelessness trumps the need to document both versions. People do still play v0.34.07, and the wiki shouldn't just ignore that their experience will be different from those who always keep up-to-date on versions. --[[User:Timrem|timrem]] 02:50, 19 May 2012 (UTC) ''edit to add:'' "references to differences from or similarities to old versions of DF should be reduced and eliminated, and put in the appropriate version page"; imo, this is "the appropriate version page" to be talking about both versions of mining. --[[User:Timrem|timrem]] 02:57, 19 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− |