v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Editing v0.34 Talk:Skyfort
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.
You are editing a page for an older version of Dwarf Fortress ("Main" is the current version, not "v0.34"). Please make sure you intend to do this. If you are here by mistake, see the current page instead.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:::::The connection is that all of those pages aren't "actually part of the game, just something that players have decided to do", so your argument that there are no skyforts in the game is specious at best. While some of those examples are more useful than a skyfort, [[dwarfputing]] is arguable less useful and it has an entire series of articles on the wiki. | :::::The connection is that all of those pages aren't "actually part of the game, just something that players have decided to do", so your argument that there are no skyforts in the game is specious at best. While some of those examples are more useful than a skyfort, [[dwarfputing]] is arguable less useful and it has an entire series of articles on the wiki. | ||
:::::Sure, I'll add skyforts to [[stupid dwarf trick]]. But being included in that list does not preclude having a separate article--see [[waterfall]], [[dam]], [[danger room]], [[drowning chamber]], [[dwarfputing]], [[mass pitting]], etc. Some of those designs are more valuable than a skyfort, while others are less valuable. The question I asked, though, was "why not?", and I still haven't heard a reasonable answer beyond your opinion that it's "clutter". This page exists because somebody thought it was worth adding to the wiki. Just because you don't find a page useful or interesting is no reason to suggest that the page shouldn't exist.--[[User:Loci|Loci]] ([[User talk:Loci|talk]]) 02:16, 20 December 2013 (UTC) | :::::Sure, I'll add skyforts to [[stupid dwarf trick]]. But being included in that list does not preclude having a separate article--see [[waterfall]], [[dam]], [[danger room]], [[drowning chamber]], [[dwarfputing]], [[mass pitting]], etc. Some of those designs are more valuable than a skyfort, while others are less valuable. The question I asked, though, was "why not?", and I still haven't heard a reasonable answer beyond your opinion that it's "clutter". This page exists because somebody thought it was worth adding to the wiki. Just because you don't find a page useful or interesting is no reason to suggest that the page shouldn't exist.--[[User:Loci|Loci]] ([[User talk:Loci|talk]]) 02:16, 20 December 2013 (UTC) | ||
− |