v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "40d Talk:Legendary"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Lordmick134 (talk | contribs) (New page: Should we mention that legendary dwarves don't pay money once the economy sets in? Might be important. --~~~~) |
(blinking) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Might be important. | Might be important. | ||
--[[User:Lordmick134|Lordmick134]] 12:21, 22 March 2008 (EDT) | --[[User:Lordmick134|Lordmick134]] 12:21, 22 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Blinking== | ||
| + | I'm not sure how important this is, but I'll talk about it anyways. I set up a game with [[User:Rinn/AdjustProfile|Adjust Profile]] so that all of my starting Dwarves were legendary. So la-de-da-da, they all blink 'in tune' at the start. After some time, they some of them started to blink out of tune with one another. So does this mean that the blinking subroutine is independently timed on each dwarf? Is there significant lag if one has a legendary dwarf vs a non-legendary? Or 5? Or 50? --[[User:Chrispy|Chrispy]] 08:21, 25 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 12:21, 25 March 2008
Should we mention that legendary dwarves don't pay money once the economy sets in? Might be important. --Lordmick134 12:21, 22 March 2008 (EDT)
Blinking
I'm not sure how important this is, but I'll talk about it anyways. I set up a game with Adjust Profile so that all of my starting Dwarves were legendary. So la-de-da-da, they all blink 'in tune' at the start. After some time, they some of them started to blink out of tune with one another. So does this mean that the blinking subroutine is independently timed on each dwarf? Is there significant lag if one has a legendary dwarf vs a non-legendary? Or 5? Or 50? --Chrispy 08:21, 25 March 2008 (EDT)