- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Spectre"
m |
m (→So read it...: new section) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* Generally, [[Dwarf_Fortress_Wiki:Community_Portal#We_are_doing_this.21_Let_us_do_it_right.|read and follow the rules.]] They're like a little constitution, except not boring! Really, read them. | * Generally, [[Dwarf_Fortress_Wiki:Community_Portal#We_are_doing_this.21_Let_us_do_it_right.|read and follow the rules.]] They're like a little constitution, except not boring! Really, read them. | ||
<div align=center><div style="width: 28em; padding: 0.5em; margin-bottom: 0.5em; margin-top: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #ccc; background: #eee; text-align: center">''"You have been processed! Go forth, now, and edit!" --[[User:Savok|Savok]]''</div></div> | <div align=center><div style="width: 28em; padding: 0.5em; margin-bottom: 0.5em; margin-top: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #ccc; background: #eee; text-align: center">''"You have been processed! Go forth, now, and edit!" --[[User:Savok|Savok]]''</div></div> | ||
| + | |||
| + | == So read it... == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hi. That was put up there for you to give a quick read over. If you're going to be active on the wiki, you are a most welcome addition - but only if take a moment to learn the few guidelines we do have. This is not a censure - far from it - rather an encouragement to own what you are interested in. In the case of your "gems" page, 2 things: First, article names are singular if possible, and second, check out the old 40d article for a clue how it was done. (Via '''<nowiki>{{av}}</nowiki>''' link is the easiest way.) Doesn't have to be identical, but many edits were put into refining those into their current form, and most (not all, but "most") are pretty good. Anyway, readya later.--[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 03:48, 4 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 03:48, 4 April 2010
Welcome to this wiki! Dwarf Fortress rapidly becomes more complicated, and we're always glad to have new writers.
Since you should try to follow wiki standards, and you probably don't know ours yet, we've made a list of basic guidelines. Note that this is a template, not a customized message for you.
- To tell us who you are when you talk, please sign your posts on discussion pages by typing
--~~~~after your posts. This can also be inserted with the
button if JavaScript is enabled. - Don't put a question mark in the title of a page. Question marks mess things up, and your page will be moved to a different name.
- When making comments on a talk page, use one more colon before each line in your comment than was used in the comment you reply to. In general, put exactly one empty line between comments by different users but do not use blank lines inside of a comment.
- Avoid making many small edits to a page. Instead, try to make one large edit. This makes the history of the page a lot easier to read.
- Don't edit the user page of another user. If you want to tell them something, add the comment to their talk page.
- If you put a comment at the bottom of a talk page with section headers, you've probably put it in a section. Putting things in the wrong sections is confusing. You can create a section!
- Generally, read and follow the rules. They're like a little constitution, except not boring! Really, read them.
So read it...
Hi. That was put up there for you to give a quick read over. If you're going to be active on the wiki, you are a most welcome addition - but only if take a moment to learn the few guidelines we do have. This is not a censure - far from it - rather an encouragement to own what you are interested in. In the case of your "gems" page, 2 things: First, article names are singular if possible, and second, check out the old 40d article for a clue how it was done. (Via {{av}} link is the easiest way.) Doesn't have to be identical, but many edits were put into refining those into their current form, and most (not all, but "most") are pretty good. Anyway, readya later.--Albedo 03:48, 4 April 2010 (UTC)