User talk:Spectre

Welcome to this wiki! Dwarf Fortress rapidly becomes more complicated, and we're always glad to have new writers.
Since you should try to follow wiki standards, and you probably don't know ours yet, we've made a list of basic guidelines. Note that this is a template, not a customized message for you.

• To tell us who you are when you talk, please sign your posts on discussion pages by typing --~~~~ after your posts. This can also be inserted with the button if JavaScript is enabled.
• Don't put a question mark in the title of a page. Question marks mess things up, and your page will be moved to a different name.
• When making comments on a talk page, use one more colon before each line in your comment than was used in the comment you reply to. In general, put exactly one empty line between comments by different users but do not use blank lines inside of a comment.
• Avoid making many small edits to a page. Instead, try to make one large edit. This makes the history of the page a lot easier to read.
• Don't edit the user page of another user. If you want to tell them something, add the comment to their talk page.
• If you put a comment at the bottom of a talk page with section headers, you've probably put it in a section. Putting things in the wrong sections is confusing. You can create a section!
• Generally, read and follow the rules. They're like a little constitution, except not boring! Really, read them.

"You have been processed! Go forth, now, and edit!" --Savok

So read it...

Hi. That was put up there for you to give a quick read over. If you're going to be active on the wiki, you are a most welcome addition - but only if take a moment to learn the few guidelines we do have. This is not a censure - far from it - rather an encouragement to own what you are interested in. In the case of your "gems" page, 2 things: First, article names are singular if possible, and second, check out the old 40d article for a clue how it was done. (Via {{av}} link is the easiest way.) Doesn't have to be identical, but many edits were put into refining those into their current form, and most (not all, but "most") are pretty good. Anyway, readya later.--Albedo 03:48, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

If you got a problem with that... 

Hi. Do you see any contradiction with that interpretation and the following lines?...

...you are a most welcome addition... 
...This is not a censure - far from it - rather an encouragement to own what you are interested in. 

I try not to waste time with people who have no promise. I don't usually "have a problem" with someone who makes an honest effort but is merely unaware of the guidelines. You showed me both, and I was pointing toward where you want to go next to solve the latter if you are interested in editing, which I thought you were. And also so you were clear on why your effort got the axe - something I don't do for true "problem" editors. If you, in turn, have a problem with that, then likewise I'm sure. But I'm hoping you read only part of the above in a pre-coffee blur, and not all of it, and jumped to conclusions based on only the section title - which in this light might not have been the best choice. Either way, hope to read you later as an editor, rather than just a user.--Albedo 16:47, 4 April 2010 (UTC)