v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Editing 40d Talk:Department of Dwarven Veteran's Affairs
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.
You are editing a page for an older version of Dwarf Fortress ("Main" is the current version, not "40d"). Please make sure you intend to do this. If you are here by mistake, see the current page instead.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
This fine article and this discussion gave me idea about a "shadow" wiki. For most popular topics - make a default serious article (as is now for most topics) and make a clearly marked, unified style links at the top of some pages to "shadow" variants that would state basically the same things as the original but in a creative tongue in cheek words. Of course only "shadow" article should be allowed to wiki-link to other "shadow" articles. --[[User:Another|Another]] 04:15, 14 December 2007 (EST) | This fine article and this discussion gave me idea about a "shadow" wiki. For most popular topics - make a default serious article (as is now for most topics) and make a clearly marked, unified style links at the top of some pages to "shadow" variants that would state basically the same things as the original but in a creative tongue in cheek words. Of course only "shadow" article should be allowed to wiki-link to other "shadow" articles. --[[User:Another|Another]] 04:15, 14 December 2007 (EST) | ||
| − | :Not a shadowed wiki, but instead a flavored wiki. It would be as easy as linking to | + | :Not a shadowed wiki, but instead a flavored wiki. It would be as easy as linking to [[Flavor:article]] instead of the normal article. --[[User:Ikkonoishi|Ikkonoishi]] 11:04, 14 December 2007 (EST) |
::Or even merely a template like the spoiler template, that simply says "Information on this particular article is meant purely for humor value and should not be taken seriously. (However accurate it may in fact be.)"--[[User:Alfador|Alfador]] 11:28, 14 December 2007 (EST) | ::Or even merely a template like the spoiler template, that simply says "Information on this particular article is meant purely for humor value and should not be taken seriously. (However accurate it may in fact be.)"--[[User:Alfador|Alfador]] 11:28, 14 December 2007 (EST) | ||
| − | :::I think I prefer the template idea. I could create a new namespace like | + | :::I think I prefer the template idea. I could create a new namespace like [[Humor:Article]] but is it really necessary? I believe a "joke" template could do the same. --[[User:Senso|Senso]] 12:04, 17 December 2007 (EST) |
::::<nowiki>*agrees*</nowiki> --[[User:Savok|Savok]] 15:14, 5 February 2008 (EST) | ::::<nowiki>*agrees*</nowiki> --[[User:Savok|Savok]] 15:14, 5 February 2008 (EST) | ||