v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
  • v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
  • Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.

Difference between revisions of "40d Talk:Speed"

From Dwarf Fortress Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(let Toady know)
(The weight-related encumbrance formula is solved! Woot! In other news, a section was moved here from Talk:Legendary.)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Encumbrance bug in Adventure mode ==
 
== Encumbrance bug in Adventure mode ==
 +
 
Tested several times. If adventurer has no strength bonuses - all is as expected: more weight - less speed. But adventurer with any stength bonus (at least '''Strong''') does not experience speed loss, even if heavily encumbered. Tested with picking up rocks.--[[User:Dorten|Dorten]] 04:02, 15 January 2008 (EST)
 
Tested several times. If adventurer has no strength bonuses - all is as expected: more weight - less speed. But adventurer with any stength bonus (at least '''Strong''') does not experience speed loss, even if heavily encumbered. Tested with picking up rocks.--[[User:Dorten|Dorten]] 04:02, 15 January 2008 (EST)
 +
 
:Report that on the Bay 12 forums if you want to see it fixed (http://www.bay12games.com/cgi-local/ultimatebb.cgi?&category=3).--[[User:Maximus|Maximus]] 15:06, 15 January 2008 (EST)
 
:Report that on the Bay 12 forums if you want to see it fixed (http://www.bay12games.com/cgi-local/ultimatebb.cgi?&category=3).--[[User:Maximus|Maximus]] 15:06, 15 January 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
:Rubbish! Or at least it is now. --[[User:Savok|Savok]] 20:05, 6 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Encumbrance ==
 +
 +
"this editor has not noticed encumbrance."<br>
 +
Watch a hauler drag a bin fill of platinum ore to the trading depot. He MIGHT move a tile for every fifty steps his compatriots carrying single bolts get. --[[User:Dadamh|Dadamh]] 15:54, 3 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Ow! That's "encumbrance" not "encumbrence." Cruel, you are.
 +
:That's confusingly worded. It sounds like you say in the first sentence that you haven't seen encumbrance, but the other two sentences seem to say that you have seen it. I'll guess that you're trying to quote and reformat your comment appropriately.
 +
:I haven't tested anything, but it appears that both the weight and encumbrance systems are dramatically altered. It also appears that it's hard to set up a system in which encumbrance appears, so we haven't cared about it.
 +
:<nowiki>*tests*</nowiki> --[[User:Savok|Savok]] 16:34, 3 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
::Woot! Success! *points to the next section* --[[User:Savok|Savok]] 20:05, 6 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Weight-related encumbrance formula solved! ==
 +
 +
The two weight-related changes from the old version are 1: different weights and 2: weight_new=10weight_old. In other words, 500Γ in the new system is the same as 50Γ in the old. See [http://dffd.wimbli.com/file.php?id=208 the data] that I used.<br>
 +
That 4½ hours was so worth it. --[[User:Savok|Savok]] 20:05, 6 June 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 00:05, 7 June 2008

Encumbrance bug in Adventure mode

Tested several times. If adventurer has no strength bonuses - all is as expected: more weight - less speed. But adventurer with any stength bonus (at least Strong) does not experience speed loss, even if heavily encumbered. Tested with picking up rocks.--Dorten 04:02, 15 January 2008 (EST)

Report that on the Bay 12 forums if you want to see it fixed (http://www.bay12games.com/cgi-local/ultimatebb.cgi?&category=3).--Maximus 15:06, 15 January 2008 (EST)
Rubbish! Or at least it is now. --Savok 20:05, 6 June 2008 (EDT)

Encumbrance

"this editor has not noticed encumbrance."
Watch a hauler drag a bin fill of platinum ore to the trading depot. He MIGHT move a tile for every fifty steps his compatriots carrying single bolts get. --Dadamh 15:54, 3 June 2008 (EDT)

Ow! That's "encumbrance" not "encumbrence." Cruel, you are.
That's confusingly worded. It sounds like you say in the first sentence that you haven't seen encumbrance, but the other two sentences seem to say that you have seen it. I'll guess that you're trying to quote and reformat your comment appropriately.
I haven't tested anything, but it appears that both the weight and encumbrance systems are dramatically altered. It also appears that it's hard to set up a system in which encumbrance appears, so we haven't cared about it.
*tests* --Savok 16:34, 3 June 2008 (EDT)
Woot! Success! *points to the next section* --Savok 20:05, 6 June 2008 (EDT)

Weight-related encumbrance formula solved!

The two weight-related changes from the old version are 1: different weights and 2: weight_new=10weight_old. In other words, 500Γ in the new system is the same as 50Γ in the old. See the data that I used.
That 4½ hours was so worth it. --Savok 20:05, 6 June 2008 (EDT)