v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Editing 40d Talk:Stone
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.
You are editing a page for an older version of Dwarf Fortress ("Main" is the current version, not "40d"). Please make sure you intend to do this. If you are here by mistake, see the current page instead.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 185: | Line 185: | ||
With that philosophy we can delete 90% of the wiki, leaving only "advanced but not too advanced" stuff- but based on ''who's'' perspective? <br /> | With that philosophy we can delete 90% of the wiki, leaving only "advanced but not too advanced" stuff- but based on ''who's'' perspective? <br /> | ||
The wiki starts at square 1 and goes as deep as the users care to offer. Having info on different pages is not always the best plan. The column looks odd because most stones ''are'' generic - it's the few exceptions that it addresses, and it covers them well - aesthetics aside, it does the job from a functional perspective. In the end, that is the large part of what we're talking about - style and personal preference. The only functional distinction is whether that information is better served scattered on several articles, or living in this one table.--[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 18:09, 11 August 2009 (UTC) | The wiki starts at square 1 and goes as deep as the users care to offer. Having info on different pages is not always the best plan. The column looks odd because most stones ''are'' generic - it's the few exceptions that it addresses, and it covers them well - aesthetics aside, it does the job from a functional perspective. In the end, that is the large part of what we're talking about - style and personal preference. The only functional distinction is whether that information is better served scattered on several articles, or living in this one table.--[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 18:09, 11 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
== Alluvial == | == Alluvial == | ||
Line 201: | Line 190: | ||
:Alluvial = soil, at least in DF. [[User:VengefulDonut|VengefulDonut]] 23:45, 10 August 2009 (UTC) | :Alluvial = soil, at least in DF. [[User:VengefulDonut|VengefulDonut]] 23:45, 10 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |