v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Toady One"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:The giant fake bio should be scrapped. This is starting to look like an ED article. [[User:VengefulDonut|VengefulDonut]] 11:55, 28 March 2010 (UTC) | :The giant fake bio should be scrapped. This is starting to look like an ED article. [[User:VengefulDonut|VengefulDonut]] 11:55, 28 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
::I agree. --[[User:Briess|Briess]] 13:54, 28 March 2010 (UTC) | ::I agree. --[[User:Briess|Briess]] 13:54, 28 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::Me too. The last time I looked at this page, it looked like [http://df.magmawiki.com/index.php?title=Toady_One&oldid=62649 this], which is much more appropriate in my opinion, albeit a bit short. I agree that having a bit more actual information on Tarn would be interesting as well. I don't even find its current state funny at all, really. --[[User:Retro|Retro]] 16:18, 28 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:18, 28 March 2010
It'd be nice to see a little more biographical (or biological?) information on the Toady One. And why he chose that nickname. --Rusty Mcloon 06:08, 29 May 2008 (EDT)
Well we could always just add some we made up.
- Who ever wrote this bio you deserve a reward I laughed so hard who knew dwarf fortress is based directly off of his life. XD
This is definitely funny, but shouldn't we have some actual biography here? --Eduren 04:44, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
- Wow! Simply amazing! 23:39, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- The giant fake bio should be scrapped. This is starting to look like an ED article. VengefulDonut 11:55, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- I agree. --Briess 13:54, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- Me too. The last time I looked at this page, it looked like this, which is much more appropriate in my opinion, albeit a bit short. I agree that having a bit more actual information on Tarn would be interesting as well. I don't even find its current state funny at all, really. --Retro 16:18, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- I agree. --Briess 13:54, 28 March 2010 (UTC)