v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Editing User talk:91.206.183.174
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This is a talk page for an anonymous user. Due to a bug in Mediawiki, an error will be displayed after you save. Your edit will still be saved, so do not attempt to resubmit the form. |
Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Welcome back to the wiki. As with your previous edit to [http://df.magmawiki.com/index.php/Dwarf_Fortress_Wiki_talk:Centralized_Discussion Centralized Discussion Talk], you erased the whole page in order to write your message. Given that you have already been told how to avoid doing this, I for one am inclined to consider it vandalism. Be warned - the administration is capable of blocking you from the site. --[[User:DeMatt|DeMatt]] 05:08, 5 June 2010 (UTC) | Welcome back to the wiki. As with your previous edit to [http://df.magmawiki.com/index.php/Dwarf_Fortress_Wiki_talk:Centralized_Discussion Centralized Discussion Talk], you erased the whole page in order to write your message. Given that you have already been told how to avoid doing this, I for one am inclined to consider it vandalism. Be warned - the administration is capable of blocking you from the site. --[[User:DeMatt|DeMatt]] 05:08, 5 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Given two extremely similar edits to the same page (blanking the entire page to add a rather vague comment), I would not be surprised if this was a spambot trying to "test the waters" (or if it's outright broken). --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 14:21, 5 June 2010 (UTC) | :Given two extremely similar edits to the same page (blanking the entire page to add a rather vague comment), I would not be surprised if this was a spambot trying to "test the waters" (or if it's outright broken). --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 14:21, 5 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
− | ::After a quick google search, I found both of its "introduction" posts on a bunch of other forums, | + | ::After a quick google search, I found both of its "introduction" posts on a bunch of other forums, '''word for word'''. It's a spambot - kill it with extreme prejudice. --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 14:24, 5 June 2010 (UTC) |