v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
  • v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
  • Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.

Editing User talk:Birthright

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.


The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 11: Line 11:
 
:::Then [[Special:Search?search=exploit&fulltext=Search|all the other references to exploits]] need to be removed as well, which is rather foolish, as it simply serves to screw up newbies when something they didn't think would change, suddenly does, because they'll no longer know that certain things that are possible in-game, aren't the way they're intended to be. -[[User:N9103|Edward]] 23:43, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 
:::Then [[Special:Search?search=exploit&fulltext=Search|all the other references to exploits]] need to be removed as well, which is rather foolish, as it simply serves to screw up newbies when something they didn't think would change, suddenly does, because they'll no longer know that certain things that are possible in-game, aren't the way they're intended to be. -[[User:N9103|Edward]] 23:43, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
  
::::[[talk:refuse stockpile]] [[User:VengefulDonut|VengefulDonut]] 13:28, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
+
::::Your argument is based on the premise that the predictions of future changes are generally accurate. I'm not willing to accept that assumption. I think the guesses are wrong at least as often as they are right.
 +
::::Also, I don't see how assorted change guesses scattered throughout the wiki will do anything to prepare a newbie when a new version comes around. If you think this is a serious problem, we would be better off consolidating known changes into some sort of release notes page when a new version rolls out.
 +
::::Ad hoc mixing of fact and opinion in the same article is poor style, so I think you are correct (even if you didn't intend it that way) that other exploit comments in articles should be removed. They could be replaced with a "see also: [[exploits]]" link at the bottom of the relevant section. [[User:VengefulDonut|VengefulDonut]] 13:27, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
  
 
== New User Greeting ==
 
== New User Greeting ==

Please note that all contributions to Dwarf Fortress Wiki are considered to be released under the GFDL & MIT (see Dwarf Fortress Wiki:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Please sign comments with ~~~~

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)