v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
  • v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
  • Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.

Editing User talk:Waladil

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.


The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 12: Line 12:
 
== [[Dwarf Fortress Wiki:Versions]] ==
 
== [[Dwarf Fortress Wiki:Versions]] ==
 
Based on your comments and input on the administration requests pages I thought you might be interested in this kind of discussion.  Please bring in your comments on this page and on it's talk page and let everyone know what you think.  Thanks! [[User:Mason11987|Mason11987]] 20:46, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 
Based on your comments and input on the administration requests pages I thought you might be interested in this kind of discussion.  Please bring in your comments on this page and on it's talk page and let everyone know what you think.  Thanks! [[User:Mason11987|Mason11987]] 20:46, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
==[[40d:Challenges]]==
 +
RL concerns and "accuracy" really have no relevance to or place in DF articles.  It's like arguing whether a pike should be better than a spear - it is in DF, and that's where we are, so end of discussion.  All good, readya later.--[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 18:45, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
:You may want to check who you're upbraiding: When you undid my comment about the real slope of mountains, it was in fact a reply to somebody else's comment. You seem to be set on believing I'm in the wrong. However, when I took a moment to compare _your_ changes to _my_ comments, we are in fact in total and complete agreement. You changed a dome from being 20 wide and 20 tall to being 20 wide (10 in radius) and 10 tall (10 in radius again) which was pretty much my point. You deleted a total of four sentences, two of which were written by me. The other two weren't me.<br />All I wrote was "Actually, any mountain that went five feet up for every twenty feet across would be nearly impossible to climb. Try it sometime." My point was that if a mountain went up five feet (my personal approximation for a tile/z-level) every fifteen or twenty feet that would make it a very steep hill.<br />However, the person before me said "1 tile does '''NOT''' necessarily equal 1 Z-level; after all even the steepest mountains change a Z-level only every 3 or 4 tiles." Therefore, my rebuttal was centered around the fact that the steepest mountains would change approximately 5 feet per fifteen, making DF's steepest mountains approximately on par with our own.<br />The end result of all this is simple: Somebody made an incorrect comment, and I provided a rebuttal. In what appears to be a fit of self-righteous arrogance, you attributed a much larger quantity of writing to me than was accurate and managed to agree with me, then tell me how wrong I am. Moreover, if you had been spending time reading on the forums, you would understand that Toady does attempt to model DF on reality, even if it's sometimes off. For example, the funky crook symbol is actually supposed to represent a kilogram, and is being made accurate to that measurement in the next version.<br />However, if you think you know better than Toady, then be my guest. --[[User:Waladil|Waladil]] 03:11, 30 March 2010 (UTC) <br />P.S. Putting the "minor change" tick-mark on the box doesn't actually make it a minor change. That box is for things like spelling and grammar, not deleting a paragraph.
 +
 +
You may want to check who you're upbraiding
 +
::When I "upbraid", you'll know it (trust me).  The phrase "all good" would have been a clue to most that this wasn't that.
 +
The end result of all this is simple: Somebody made an incorrect comment, and <br />I provided a rebuttal.
 +
:: And both were inappropriate, which is why both took the high dive.  It's not the content, but the format.  A DF wiki article page is not for "rebuttals", it's for facts relevant to DF. I was quite aware of what I deleted, and both were of a kind. (If I'd seen the other before your addition, it would have gone just as fast, all by itself.) --[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 04:48, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Please note that all contributions to Dwarf Fortress Wiki are considered to be released under the GFDL & MIT (see Dwarf Fortress Wiki:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Please sign comments with ~~~~

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)