v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "v0.31 Talk:Site"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
SethCreiyd (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[TOLERATES_SITE:RUIN] in an entity leads to an "Unrecognized Site Token: RUIN" notice in the errorlog. I believe this worked in the previous version. Trying to learn more. --[[User:SethCreiyd|SethCreiyd]] 22:37, 6 May 2010 (UTC) | [TOLERATES_SITE:RUIN] in an entity leads to an "Unrecognized Site Token: RUIN" notice in the errorlog. I believe this worked in the previous version. Trying to learn more. --[[User:SethCreiyd|SethCreiyd]] 22:37, 6 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I believe that that was probably removed because in the latest versions civilizations can actually re-inhabit ruined settlements, returning them to their proper status as towns/fortresses rather than living in their ruins, although having a civ that inhabits actual ruins would be interesting if the two scenarios (past and present) were both possible. --[[User:EricBlank|EricBlank]] August 10, 2010 | ||
Latest revision as of 06:34, 10 August 2010
Ruins Defunct?[edit]
[TOLERATES_SITE:RUIN] in an entity leads to an "Unrecognized Site Token: RUIN" notice in the errorlog. I believe this worked in the previous version. Trying to learn more. --SethCreiyd 22:37, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
I believe that that was probably removed because in the latest versions civilizations can actually re-inhabit ruined settlements, returning them to their proper status as towns/fortresses rather than living in their ruins, although having a civ that inhabits actual ruins would be interesting if the two scenarios (past and present) were both possible. --EricBlank August 10, 2010