v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
  • v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
  • Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.

Difference between revisions of "v0.34:Exploratory mining"

From Dwarf Fortress Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(improved rendering of <nowiki> divs across browsers, please revert & leave a note in talk if this is unwanted)
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
Either way, applying a good exploratory mining method will ensure you will find what you want as soon as possible, and without missing anything.
 
Either way, applying a good exploratory mining method will ensure you will find what you want as soon as possible, and without missing anything.
 +
  
 
== Dangers ==
 
== Dangers ==
Line 17: Line 18:
 
*Large pools of liquids ([[Water]], [[Magma]])
 
*Large pools of liquids ([[Water]], [[Magma]])
 
*[[Hidden Fun Stuff|Fun]]
 
*[[Hidden Fun Stuff|Fun]]
 +
  
 
==Strategies==
 
==Strategies==
Line 22: Line 24:
  
 
Those interested in *safely* exploring the depths may wish to create a level every so often where the stairway is broken so you can create barriers (like doors or lever-controlled floodgates) or garrison military squads to deal with any discovered hostiles.
 
Those interested in *safely* exploring the depths may wish to create a level every so often where the stairway is broken so you can create barriers (like doors or lever-controlled floodgates) or garrison military squads to deal with any discovered hostiles.
 +
  
 
== Exploratory Patterns ==
 
== Exploratory Patterns ==
Line 27: Line 30:
 
Patterns are represented by a unit tile. This unit tile is repeated throughout the area intended for excavation to create the desired pattern. Each pattern is analyzed with the above factors in mind.
 
Patterns are represented by a unit tile. This unit tile is repeated throughout the area intended for excavation to create the desired pattern. Each pattern is analyzed with the above factors in mind.
  
Key:
+
Key:
 
  . = Mined (floor)
 
  . = Mined (floor)
 
  x = Mined (shaft)
 
  x = Mined (shaft)
Line 41: Line 44:
 
* ''Reusability'': Approaches zero, except for mass storage. Any design other than a large hall requires reconstruction.
 
* ''Reusability'': Approaches zero, except for mass storage. Any design other than a large hall requires reconstruction.
 
* ''Bottom line'': Easy to designate, but miners tend to be a bit chaotic in their approach to the task.  Hollowing wastes labor like there's no tomorrow, but integrates extraction into the exploratory mining process. Use only if you have a lot of labor to spare, or need huge amounts of stone and don't mind the reconstruction required to make the hollow area habitable.
 
* ''Bottom line'': Easy to designate, but miners tend to be a bit chaotic in their approach to the task.  Hollowing wastes labor like there's no tomorrow, but integrates extraction into the exploratory mining process. Use only if you have a lot of labor to spare, or need huge amounts of stone and don't mind the reconstruction required to make the hollow area habitable.
 +
  
 
=== Rows ===
 
=== Rows ===
<div style="font-family: monospace; white-space: pre; line-height: 126.5%"><nowiki>░░░░░░  
+
<div style="font-family: monospace; font-size: 15px; white-space: pre; line-height: 16px; float: left; margin-right: 25px; border:1px solid #000;"><nowiki>░░░░░░
 
......
 
......
 
░░░░░░
 
░░░░░░
Line 55: Line 59:
 
* ''Bottom line'': Easy to designate, and a single miner will focus on one tunnel to the end or they take a [[break]]. This method achieves the same visibility as hollowing out, but using a mere third of the labor. Ideal for hunting single-tile gems. As an added bonus, it is more efficient than a 3×3 design.
 
* ''Bottom line'': Easy to designate, and a single miner will focus on one tunnel to the end or they take a [[break]]. This method achieves the same visibility as hollowing out, but using a mere third of the labor. Ideal for hunting single-tile gems. As an added bonus, it is more efficient than a 3×3 design.
  
Larger "tunnel" patterns are suggested to be dug in multiples of "3" to allow for later complete revealing with minimum effort.
+
Larger "tunnel" patterns are suggested to be dug in multiples of "3" to allow for later complete revealing with minimum effort.<br style="clear:both;">
 +
 
  
 
=== Ladder Rows ===
 
=== Ladder Rows ===
<div style="font-family: monospace; white-space: pre; line-height: 126.5%"><nowiki>░░░░░░░░░░░░  
+
<div style="font-family: monospace; font-size: 15px; white-space: pre; line-height: 16px; float: left; margin-right: 25px; border:1px solid #000;"><nowiki>░░░░░░░░░░░░
 
░░░░░░░░░░░░
 
░░░░░░░░░░░░
 
░░░░.░░░░░.░
 
░░░░.░░░░░.░
Line 72: Line 77:
 
* ''Visibility'': '''100%'''.
 
* ''Visibility'': '''100%'''.
 
* ''Reusability'': Moderate. Alternating corridors can be mined out to create 5 tile wide rooms of any length... if the extra doors aren't a concern.
 
* ''Reusability'': Moderate. Alternating corridors can be mined out to create 5 tile wide rooms of any length... if the extra doors aren't a concern.
* ''Bottom line'': A little more tedious to designate, but the increased re-usability and efficiency make this an attractive alternative.
+
* ''Bottom line'': A little more tedious to designate, but the increased re-usability and efficiency make this an attractive alternative.<br style="clear:both;">
 +
 
  
 
=== Diagonal every 5 ===
 
=== Diagonal every 5 ===
<div style="font-family: monospace; white-space: pre; line-height: 126.5%"><nowiki>░░.░░░░.░░
+
<div style="font-family: monospace; font-size: 15px; white-space: pre; line-height: 16px; float: left; margin-right: 25px; border:1px solid #000;"><nowiki>░░.░░░░.░░
 
░.░░░░.░░░
 
░.░░░░.░░░
 
.░░░░.░░░░
 
.░░░░.░░░░
Line 87: Line 93:
  
 
A variation would put diagonals every 10 or 20, laying the groundwork to fill them in later for higher visibility if desired.
 
A variation would put diagonals every 10 or 20, laying the groundwork to fill them in later for higher visibility if desired.
 +
  
 
=== Mine shafts, grid of every 3 tiles ===
 
=== Mine shafts, grid of every 3 tiles ===
 
+
<div style="font-family: monospace; font-size: 15px; white-space: pre; line-height: 16px; float: left; margin-right: 25px; border:1px solid #000;"><nowiki>░░░░░░░░░
<div style="font-family: monospace; white-space: pre; line-height: 126.5%"><nowiki>░░░░░░░░░
 
 
░X░░X░░X░
 
░X░░X░░X░
 
░░░░░░░░░
 
░░░░░░░░░
Line 103: Line 109:
  
 
:It takes a lot of keypressing to designate, although you can save some effort by designating every third row across the entire width and height of the area to be excavated and then removing the designations ({{k|d}}-{{k|x}}) on all but every third column.
 
:It takes a lot of keypressing to designate, although you can save some effort by designating every third row across the entire width and height of the area to be excavated and then removing the designations ({{k|d}}-{{k|x}}) on all but every third column.
''For a discussion on optimizing travel times through mineshafts, see [[Mineshaft stitching]].''
+
''For a discussion on optimizing travel times through mineshafts, see [[Mineshaft stitching]].''<br style="clear:both;">
 +
 
  
 
=== Diagonal ramps ===
 
=== Diagonal ramps ===
Line 109: Line 116:
 
The pattern as shown is 1 up-ramp every 7 tiles vertically, or 1/14 horizontally, though this could be turned 90 degrees.  The downramps are shown, but are only designated on the next level down.  (Be ''sure'' you know how [[ramp]]s work before trying this one!)
 
The pattern as shown is 1 up-ramp every 7 tiles vertically, or 1/14 horizontally, though this could be turned 90 degrees.  The downramps are shown, but are only designated on the next level down.  (Be ''sure'' you know how [[ramp]]s work before trying this one!)
  
<div style="font-family: monospace; white-space: pre; line-height: 126.5%"><nowiki>░░▼░░░░░░░░░░▲░░▼░░░░░░░░░░▲
+
<div style="font-family: monospace; font-size: 15px; white-space: pre; line-height: 16px; float: left; margin-right: 25px; border:1px solid #000;"><nowiki>░░▼░░░░░░░░░░▲░░▼░░░░░░░░░░▲
 
░░░░░░░░░▲░░▼░░░░░░░░░░▲░░▼░
 
░░░░░░░░░▲░░▼░░░░░░░░░░▲░░▼░
 
░░░░░▲░░▼░░░░░░░░░░▲░░▼░░░░░
 
░░░░░▲░░▼░░░░░░░░░░▲░░▼░░░░░
Line 121: Line 128:
 
* ''Visibility'': '''100%'''.
 
* ''Visibility'': '''100%'''.
 
* ''Reusability'': Moderate.  3x3 spaces cannot be created until at least one up-ramp is removed or a down-ramp floored over.  [[Ramp]]s are less convenient than stairs for many purposes (for example, digging out the wrong tiles around a ramp can make it unusable).   
 
* ''Reusability'': Moderate.  3x3 spaces cannot be created until at least one up-ramp is removed or a down-ramp floored over.  [[Ramp]]s are less convenient than stairs for many purposes (for example, digging out the wrong tiles around a ramp can make it unusable).   
* ''Bottom line'': In some ways the most efficient method of all, but difficult to designate and somewhat inconvenient (especially around the edges of the map).  Awkward to stitch together.
+
* ''Bottom line'': In some ways the most efficient method of all, but difficult to designate and somewhat inconvenient (especially around the edges of the map).  Awkward to stitch together.<br style="clear:both;">
 +
 
  
 
=== Pinwheel Shafts===
 
=== Pinwheel Shafts===
 
+
<div style="font-family: monospace; font-size: 15px; white-space: pre; line-height: 16px; float: left; margin-right: 25px; border:1px solid #000;"><nowiki>░░░░░░░░░░░
<div style="font-family: monospace; white-space: pre; line-height: 126.5%"><nowiki>░░░░░░░░░░░
 
 
░XX░░X░░XX░
 
░XX░░X░░XX░
 
░░░░░X░░░░░
 
░░░░░X░░░░░
Line 140: Line 147:
 
* ''Visibility'': '''96.6%'''.
 
* ''Visibility'': '''96.6%'''.
 
* ''Reusability'': Workshops can be easily fitted into the unmined 3x3 areas.
 
* ''Reusability'': Workshops can be easily fitted into the unmined 3x3 areas.
* ''Bottom line'': Very similar to Mine Shafts, but you can replace the up/down stairways with alternating up stairs and down stairs on different levels, eliminating the chance that one of your dwarves will slip and fall all the way down the shaft to their deaths.
+
* ''Bottom line'': Very similar to Mine Shafts, but you can replace the up/down stairways with alternating up stairs and down stairs on different levels, eliminating the chance that one of your dwarves will slip and fall all the way down the shaft to their deaths.<br style="clear:both;">
 +
 
  
 
=== 7×7 blocks ===
 
=== 7×7 blocks ===
<div style="font-family: monospace; white-space: pre; line-height: 126.5%"><nowiki>▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓
+
<div style="font-family: monospace; font-size: 15px; white-space: pre; line-height: 16px; float: left; margin-right: 25px; border:1px solid #000;"><nowiki>▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓
 
░░░░.░░░░░░░.░░░
 
░░░░.░░░░░░░.░░░
 
................
 
................
Line 163: Line 171:
 
* ''Bottom line'': This is a low-labor method great for vein-hunting. The low labor cost puts you in a position to invest more and get better coverage if desired.
 
* ''Bottom line'': This is a low-labor method great for vein-hunting. The low labor cost puts you in a position to invest more and get better coverage if desired.
  
If you think you may wish to later use the "rows" method (above) for 100% visibility, this could be based on a spacing of 6, 9, or 12.  Wider spacing starts to risk missing even veins.
+
If you think you may wish to later use the "rows" method (above) for 100% visibility, this could be based on a spacing of 6, 9, or 12.  Wider spacing starts to risk missing even veins.<br style="clear:both;">
 +
 
  
 
=== 15×15 blocks ===
 
=== 15×15 blocks ===
<div style="font-family: monospace; white-space: pre; line-height: 126.5%"><nowiki>▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
+
<div style="font-family: monospace; font-size: 15px; white-space: pre; line-height: 16px; float: left; margin-right: 25px; border:1px solid #000;"><nowiki>▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
 
▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
 
▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
 
▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
 
▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
Line 183: Line 192:
 
* ''Visibility'': 87/256 (34%) of the tiles are visible.
 
* ''Visibility'': 87/256 (34%) of the tiles are visible.
 
* ''Reusability'': High. A 15×15 block of solid rock is extremely versatile when it comes to interior design. It's easily converted into a 7×7 block design, which may be further converted into a 3×3 block design.
 
* ''Reusability'': High. A 15×15 block of solid rock is extremely versatile when it comes to interior design. It's easily converted into a 7×7 block design, which may be further converted into a 3×3 block design.
* ''Bottom line'': This method is preferable when you are low on labor. It can easily accommodate parts of your fort, or serve as the precursor for a more thorough search.  A 12×12 or 18×18 version are also valid options, with obvious (dis)advantages.
+
* ''Bottom line'': This method is preferable when you are low on labor. It can easily accommodate parts of your fort, or serve as the precursor for a more thorough search.  A 12×12 or 18×18 version are also valid options, with obvious (dis)advantages.<br style="clear:both;">
 +
 
  
 
=== Mine Shafts on a 6-, 9-, 12-, or 15-grid ===
 
=== Mine Shafts on a 6-, 9-, 12-, or 15-grid ===
 
+
<div style="font-family: monospace; font-size: 15px; white-space: pre; line-height: 16px; float: left; margin-right: 25px; border:1px solid #000;"><nowiki>▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
<div style="font-family: monospace; white-space: pre; line-height: 126.5%"><nowiki>▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
 
 
▓▓▓▓▓░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░░▓▓▓▓
 
▓▓▓▓▓░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░░▓▓▓▓
 
▓▓▓▓▓░X░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░X░▓▓▓▓
 
▓▓▓▓▓░X░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░X░▓▓▓▓
Line 210: Line 219:
 
* ''Bottom line'': This method should be used when you are looking for [[caverns]], or getting a feel for the various rock layers, or just hoping to get lucky with little effort.  Grids larger than 15 may start to miss even large features such as large clusters, but can be used for identifying stone layers, and can always be filled back in later with shafts on a tighter grid.
 
* ''Bottom line'': This method should be used when you are looking for [[caverns]], or getting a feel for the various rock layers, or just hoping to get lucky with little effort.  Grids larger than 15 may start to miss even large features such as large clusters, but can be used for identifying stone layers, and can always be filled back in later with shafts on a tighter grid.
  
With any grid pattern, a (much) wider version could be used to start and to locate specific stone layers/areas, and then filled in later in a tighter pattern where you want if you're not lucky the first pass.  If you plan to use the 3-grid pattern (for a 100% tile reveal) later, create your grid with intervals that are a multiple of "3".  If you are only looking for veins, features or just don't care, then do as you will and play it by ear later.
+
With any grid pattern, a (much) wider version could be used to start and to locate specific stone layers/areas, and then filled in later in a tighter pattern where you want if you're not lucky the first pass.  If you plan to use the 3-grid pattern (for a 100% tile reveal) later, create your grid with intervals that are a multiple of "3".  If you are only looking for veins, features or just don't care, then do as you will and play it by ear later.<br style="clear:both;">
 
 
  
  
----
 
 
== Mountain Top Removal Excavation ==
 
== Mountain Top Removal Excavation ==
 
When the fortress is large enough, nearly every dwarf is standing idle, you have plenty of picks, and just want to mine it all ([[Elf|Environmentalist Hippies]] can go to HFS!), complete excavation may be in order.  The risk of cave-in or stranded dwarves prevents simply designating an entire mountain Channel, but mining the whole thing can be done with minimum player effort.
 
When the fortress is large enough, nearly every dwarf is standing idle, you have plenty of picks, and just want to mine it all ([[Elf|Environmentalist Hippies]] can go to HFS!), complete excavation may be in order.  The risk of cave-in or stranded dwarves prevents simply designating an entire mountain Channel, but mining the whole thing can be done with minimum player effort.

Revision as of 10:02, 20 April 2013

This article is about exploring rock layers while digging through them; if you're looking for tips for exploring already discovered caverns, check Caverns#Methods of Exploration

Once you've had enough fun to have a basic fortress working, it becomes necessary to dig down in search of ores, gems, water, etc. Exploratory mining attempts to dig out as little as possible in order to see as much as is possible, using clever digging patterns.

This article is about an older version of DF.

Goals

The main goal of exploratory mining is to find something which lies in the stone layers, be they raw materials such as ores, gems and other useful stones, or special features such as caverns and magma. While minerals are quite commonv0.31.01, reducing the need for extensive exploratory mining, one might still want to explore for minerals in order to find rare gems, some of which appear in small or even single-tile clusters. Another might want access to the caverns as soon and as easily as possible, for instance to get access to subterranean water or to set up an underground tree farm.

Either way, applying a good exploratory mining method will ensure you will find what you want as soon as possible, and without missing anything.


Dangers

Potential dangers include:

  • Hostile creatures which inhabit underground areas
  • Large pools of liquids (Water, Magma)
  • Fun


Strategies

All of the interesting stuff is below you when you start - digging straight down may be the fastest (though not the safest) way to find points of interest.

Those interested in *safely* exploring the depths may wish to create a level every so often where the stairway is broken so you can create barriers (like doors or lever-controlled floodgates) or garrison military squads to deal with any discovered hostiles.


Exploratory Patterns

Patterns are represented by a unit tile. This unit tile is repeated throughout the area intended for excavation to create the desired pattern. Each pattern is analyzed with the above factors in mind.

Key:

. = Mined (floor)
x = Mined (shaft)
░ = Visible, not mined (wall)
▓ = Not mined, not visible

Hollow

All tiles are excavated.

  • Labor: 100% of the tiles are excavated.
  • Target: Any size. If it exists in the layer, it will be found.
  • Visibility: 100% of the tiles are visible, obviously.
  • Reusability: Approaches zero, except for mass storage. Any design other than a large hall requires reconstruction.
  • Bottom line: Easy to designate, but miners tend to be a bit chaotic in their approach to the task. Hollowing wastes labor like there's no tomorrow, but integrates extraction into the exploratory mining process. Use only if you have a lot of labor to spare, or need huge amounts of stone and don't mind the reconstruction required to make the hollow area habitable.


Rows

░░░░░░ ...... ░░░░░░ ░░░░░░ ...... ░░░░░░
  • Labor: 1 per every 3 tiles (~33%) of the tiles are excavated.
  • Target: Any size. Clusters as small as a single tile are revealed.
  • Visibility: 100%.
  • Reusability: Very low. The long corridors aren't very useful, and can only be expanded to long, wide corridors, but can be made into plenty of 3x3 rooms with the right use of walls.
  • Bottom line: Easy to designate, and a single miner will focus on one tunnel to the end or they take a break. This method achieves the same visibility as hollowing out, but using a mere third of the labor. Ideal for hunting single-tile gems. As an added bonus, it is more efficient than a 3×3 design.

Larger "tunnel" patterns are suggested to be dug in multiples of "3" to allow for later complete revealing with minimum effort.


Ladder Rows

░░░░░░░░░░░░ ░░░░░░░░░░░░ ░░░░.░░░░░.░ .░..░..░..░. ░.░░░░░.░░░░ ░░░░░░░░░░░░ ░░░░.░░░░░.░ .░..░..░..░. ░.░░░░░.░░░░
  • Labor: 25% of the tiles are excavated (1 in 4).
  • Target: Any size. Clusters as small as a single tile are revealed.
  • Visibility: 100%.
  • Reusability: Moderate. Alternating corridors can be mined out to create 5 tile wide rooms of any length... if the extra doors aren't a concern.
  • Bottom line: A little more tedious to designate, but the increased re-usability and efficiency make this an attractive alternative.


Diagonal every 5

░░.░░░░.░░ ░.░░░░.░░░ .░░░░.░░░░ ░░░░.░░░░. ░░░.░░░░.░
  • Labor: 20% of the tiles are excavated (1 per 5).
  • Target: Any size. Clusters as small as a single tile are revealed.
  • Visibility: 100%.
  • Reusability: With a bit of imagination you can build nice 3x3 rooms
  • Bottom line: This method is moderately efficient among those with 100% visibility. This one doesn't use other levels to move from one spot to another but is annoying to designate.

A variation would put diagonals every 10 or 20, laying the groundwork to fill them in later for higher visibility if desired.


Mine shafts, grid of every 3 tiles

░░░░░░░░░ ░X░░X░░X░ ░░░░░░░░░ ░░░░░░░░░ ░X░░X░░X░ ░░░░░░░░░
  • Labor: 11.1% of the tiles are excavated (1/9).
  • Target: Any size. Clusters as small as a single tile are revealed.
  • Visibility: 100%.
  • Reusability: It's easy to make into square rooms of various sizes, the stairways can be removed and used as doorways, or just carved out as part of the rooms.
  • Bottom line: You'll need to clear part of one layer to get the shafts started up or down (use one of the other methods to cover the area), but for one shaft at a time this method is, tile for tile, the most efficient for those with 100% visibility, and has a great reuse value. In practice, however, if you have more than one shaft being dug at one time, up/down-mining can cause miners to jump around between shafts, wasting time.
It takes a lot of keypressing to designate, although you can save some effort by designating every third row across the entire width and height of the area to be excavated and then removing the designations (d-x) on all but every third column.

For a discussion on optimizing travel times through mineshafts, see Mineshaft stitching.


Diagonal ramps

The pattern as shown is 1 up-ramp every 7 tiles vertically, or 1/14 horizontally, though this could be turned 90 degrees. The downramps are shown, but are only designated on the next level down. (Be sure you know how ramps work before trying this one!)

░░▼░░░░░░░░░░▲░░▼░░░░░░░░░░▲ ░░░░░░░░░▲░░▼░░░░░░░░░░▲░░▼░ ░░░░░▲░░▼░░░░░░░░░░▲░░▼░░░░░ ░▲░░▼░░░░░░░░░░▲░░▼░░░░░░░░░ ▼░░░░░░░░░░▲░░▼░░░░░░░░░░▲░░ ░░░░░░░▲░░▼░░░░░░░░░░▲░░▼░░░ ░░░▲░░▼░░░░░░░░░░▲░░▼░░░░░░░ ░░▼░░░░░░░░░░▲░░▼░░░░░░░░░░▲
  • Labor: 14.3% of the tiles are excavated (1/7).
  • Target: Any size. Clusters as small as a single tile are revealed.
  • Visibility: 100%.
  • Reusability: Moderate. 3x3 spaces cannot be created until at least one up-ramp is removed or a down-ramp floored over. Ramps are less convenient than stairs for many purposes (for example, digging out the wrong tiles around a ramp can make it unusable).
  • Bottom line: In some ways the most efficient method of all, but difficult to designate and somewhat inconvenient (especially around the edges of the map). Awkward to stitch together.


Pinwheel Shafts

░░░░░░░░░░░ ░XX░░X░░XX░ ░░░░░X░░░░░ ░░░▓░░░▓░░░ ░X░░░░░░░X░ ░X░░XXX░░X░ ░X░░░░░░░X░ ░░░▓░░░▓░░░ ░░░░░X░░░░░ ░XX░░X░░XX░ ░░░░░░░░░░░
  • Labor: In this example about 17.3% of the tiles are being excavated.
  • Target: All except single-tile targets are guaranteed to be found, and those will only rarely be missed.
  • Visibility: 96.6%.
  • Reusability: Workshops can be easily fitted into the unmined 3x3 areas.
  • Bottom line: Very similar to Mine Shafts, but you can replace the up/down stairways with alternating up stairs and down stairs on different levels, eliminating the chance that one of your dwarves will slip and fall all the way down the shaft to their deaths.


7×7 blocks

▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓ ░░░░.░░░░░░░.░░░ ................ ░░░░.░░░░░░░.░░░ ▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓ ▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓ ▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓ ▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓ ▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓ ░░░░.░░░░░░░.░░░ ................ ░░░░.░░░░░░░.░░░ ▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓ ▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓
  • Labor: 15/64 (~23%) of the tiles are excavated.
  • Target: Veins and up, as the large 5X5 space left in each unit tile can easily conceal a small cluster. Small clusters will be found perhaps half the time.
  • Visibility: 39/64 (~61%) of the tiles are visible.
  • Reusability: Medium. The 7×7 blocks can easily be converted into 5×5 rooms, suitable for individual rooms, storage or workshops. Optionally, it can be converted into a grid of connected 7×7 rooms, if you center each room on a crossroad; or similarly into a grid of 3x3 rooms, good for workshops, etc. Easily converted into a more thorough 3×3 block patten by digging through the large blocks.
  • Bottom line: This is a low-labor method great for vein-hunting. The low labor cost puts you in a position to invest more and get better coverage if desired.

If you think you may wish to later use the "rows" method (above) for 100% visibility, this could be based on a spacing of 6, 9, or 12. Wider spacing starts to risk missing even veins.


15×15 blocks

▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ░░░░░.░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░.░░░░░░░░░░ ................................ ░░░░░.░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░.░░░░░░░░░░ ▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░.░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
  • Labor: 31/256 (~12%) of the tiles are excavated.
  • Target: Large clusters are guaranteed, and unless you have particularly bad luck you should also find all veins, but there is no guarantee. Veins would only rarely be hidden in the large 13×13 space left. The large 13×13 space left in each unit tile can easily conceal quite a lot.
  • Visibility: 87/256 (34%) of the tiles are visible.
  • Reusability: High. A 15×15 block of solid rock is extremely versatile when it comes to interior design. It's easily converted into a 7×7 block design, which may be further converted into a 3×3 block design.
  • Bottom line: This method is preferable when you are low on labor. It can easily accommodate parts of your fort, or serve as the precursor for a more thorough search. A 12×12 or 18×18 version are also valid options, with obvious (dis)advantages.


Mine Shafts on a 6-, 9-, 12-, or 15-grid

▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░░▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓░X░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░X░▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░░▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░░▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓░X░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░X░▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░░▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
  • Labor: from under 3% (1/36) for the 6-grid to less than 0.5% for the 15-grid (1/225).
  • Target: Large clusters and up (as above) and underground features.
  • Visibility: from 25% for the 6-grid to 4% for the 15-grid.
  • Reusability: High. Any area often needs a set of stairs (or more than one) leading up/down, and these would be the start of them.
  • Bottom line: This method should be used when you are looking for caverns, or getting a feel for the various rock layers, or just hoping to get lucky with little effort. Grids larger than 15 may start to miss even large features such as large clusters, but can be used for identifying stone layers, and can always be filled back in later with shafts on a tighter grid.

With any grid pattern, a (much) wider version could be used to start and to locate specific stone layers/areas, and then filled in later in a tighter pattern where you want if you're not lucky the first pass. If you plan to use the 3-grid pattern (for a 100% tile reveal) later, create your grid with intervals that are a multiple of "3". If you are only looking for veins, features or just don't care, then do as you will and play it by ear later.


Mountain Top Removal Excavation

When the fortress is large enough, nearly every dwarf is standing idle, you have plenty of picks, and just want to mine it all (Environmentalist Hippies can go to HFS!), complete excavation may be in order. The risk of cave-in or stranded dwarves prevents simply designating an entire mountain Channel, but mining the whole thing can be done with minimum player effort.

  • Designate up-down stairs on the entire area to excavate, on every z-level. Designate the lowest level up-stairs, and leave a single tile one z-level above undesignated.
  • Let the dwarves mine it.
  • If any walls are attached to the outermost edge of the excavation area, designate all of the edge stairs Channel to remove them (dwarves will mine them from the neighboring stairs).
  • Designate the lowest z-level for Remove Up Stairs. Leave one to prevent cave-in!
  • Build a support under the unmined tile (remember step #1?). Remove the last up stair, once everyone is out of the stairs above.
  • Link a lever far away, keep away all the suicidal idiots dwarves and pull it.

After a long wait, the entire block of stairs will collapse, leaving the entire area safely excavated. The lever can now be removed, and all goodies from an entire mountain can be collected.