v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Editing v0.34 Talk:Ethic
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.
You are editing a page for an older version of Dwarf Fortress ("Main" is the current version, not "v0.34"). Please make sure you intend to do this. If you are here by mistake, see the current page instead.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Someone needs to do !!SCIENCE!! with the REQUIRED ethic response token to determine its numerical values for determining warfare chances, as well as its effects on the handful of ethic action tokens that actually have specific in-game effects. the same goes for NOT_APPLICABLE | Someone needs to do !!SCIENCE!! with the REQUIRED ethic response token to determine its numerical values for determining warfare chances, as well as its effects on the handful of ethic action tokens that actually have specific in-game effects. the same goes for NOT_APPLICABLE | ||
| − | * I did exactly that recently, due to wondering if the REQUIRED effect had any particular quirks and noticing that it seemed to be unused. Unfortunately, my experiment consisted of generating a world that replaced nearly ALL ethics for ALL the entities, so no wars resulted because everyone has pretty much the same amorality. Aside from that, the legends entries are filled full of murders, abduction, and devouring of the dead. Strangely, the theft events I've seen all continue to only mention kobolds, suggesting that the ITEM_THIEF tag is behind their behavior rather than ethics. --[[Special:Contributions/174.33.62.112|174.33.62.112]] 15:22, 10 January 2013 (UTC) | + | * I did exactly that recently, due to wondering if the REQUIRED effect had any particular quirks and noticing that it seemed to be unused. Unfortunately, my experiment consisted of generating a world that replaced nearly ALL ethics for ALL the entities, so no wars resulted because everyone has pretty much the same amorality. Aside from that, the legends entries are filled full of murders, abduction, and devouring of the dead. Strangely, the theft events I've seen all continue to only mention kobolds, suggesting that the ITEM_THIEF tag is behind their behavior rather than ethics. I have the save posted up on https://dl.dropbox.com/u/89427928/region2.zip for now. Please ignore the previous mods used to make fortress mode painfully easy, which consist of making dwarves emotionless and adding a few "free stuff" reactions. --[[Special:Contributions/174.33.62.112|174.33.62.112]] 15:22, 10 January 2013 (UTC) |
Does anyone know values that dont lead the dwarfs into war with everything but still allow for all those goblin skeletons to be turned into something useful? Also does changing the EAT_SAPIENT require a re-gen? | Does anyone know values that dont lead the dwarfs into war with everything but still allow for all those goblin skeletons to be turned into something useful? Also does changing the EAT_SAPIENT require a re-gen? | ||