v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Editing Talk:Fun
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Fun redirect== | ==Fun redirect== | ||
− | It strikes me that the term "fun" is ~not~ version dependent, it's a euphemism for "losing". Whether a link from a 40d:article or cv:article or typed in as a Search term, it's still "losing". That is, "fun" = "losing", regardless of the current version-specifics of losing ''(which may or may not be version dependent, but that's a diff discussion)''. But "Losing" is the target article (cv or not). So the redirect should go directly to cv:losing, not cv:fun - since there is no version distinction between [[23a: | + | It strikes me that the term "fun" is ~not~ version dependent, it's a euphemism for "losing". Whether a link from a 40d:article or cv:article or typed in as a Search term, it's still "losing". That is, "fun" = "losing", regardless of the current version-specifics of losing ''(which may or may not be version dependent, but that's a diff discussion)''. But "Losing" is the target article (cv or not). So the redirect should go directly to cv:losing, not cv:fun - since there is no version distinction between [[23a:fun]] and [[40d:fun]] and [[fun:2010]] - it's all [[cv:losing|cv:losing]]. (Unless I'm missing something, which is certainly possible!) O.o |
Whatever is ultimately agreed, then this approach would then become a model for any non-game term that is non-version specific, and we can avoid this sort of cold edit-war in the future. ; ) <br /> --[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 22:38, 28 March 2010 (UTC) | Whatever is ultimately agreed, then this approach would then become a model for any non-game term that is non-version specific, and we can avoid this sort of cold edit-war in the future. ; ) <br /> --[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 22:38, 28 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |