v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Editing Template talk:Stones
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:If necessary, we can move/redirect or whatnot. Personally, I like the name rocks :) [[User:VengefulDonut|VengefulDonut]] 10:47, 25 January 2009 (EST) | :If necessary, we can move/redirect or whatnot. Personally, I like the name rocks :) [[User:VengefulDonut|VengefulDonut]] 10:47, 25 January 2009 (EST) | ||
− | |||
As this stands, all stones except the non-flux economics (categorized under "unique") are included in their respective layers - stone that always appears as clusters is listed in the layer with its parent stone(s). Where a stone appears in more than one layer, it's listed multiple times. This may or may not be desired. Also left out [[slade]]. [[User:Ancient History|Ancient History]] 02:55, 31 May 2010 (UTC) | As this stands, all stones except the non-flux economics (categorized under "unique") are included in their respective layers - stone that always appears as clusters is listed in the layer with its parent stone(s). Where a stone appears in more than one layer, it's listed multiple times. This may or may not be desired. Also left out [[slade]]. [[User:Ancient History|Ancient History]] 02:55, 31 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
Line 21: | Line 20: | ||
:::::About the "unique" row: this was a list of rocks that have some sort of special property that makes them stand out. For example, did you know you will only find diamonds in kimberlite deposits? And that graphite catches fire? And that you can make plaster out of selenite? Being economic or not is a completely different topic. | :::::About the "unique" row: this was a list of rocks that have some sort of special property that makes them stand out. For example, did you know you will only find diamonds in kimberlite deposits? And that graphite catches fire? And that you can make plaster out of selenite? Being economic or not is a completely different topic. | ||
:::::Also, the stone types that are in the list are more important than the ones that aren't (except the two super rocks). That makes them "'''relatively''' important stone types". [[User:VengefulDonut|VengefulDonut]] 07:17, 1 June 2010 (UTC) | :::::Also, the stone types that are in the list are more important than the ones that aren't (except the two super rocks). That makes them "'''relatively''' important stone types". [[User:VengefulDonut|VengefulDonut]] 07:17, 1 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
− | |||
::::::There's no point in having a Rocks template that doesn't include all the stone types. I mean, you've already got the layers identified - if you're going to have the template why not show what stones are actually in those layers? The other templates for animals and plants are all-inclusive. Your definition on the Uniques is just bizarre to me (and, more egregious, not alphabetical). Seriously, you might as well add in Kobaltite because it's the only bright blue stone. The others are at least economic stones. [[User:Ancient History|Ancient History]] 13:33, 1 June 2010 (UTC) | ::::::There's no point in having a Rocks template that doesn't include all the stone types. I mean, you've already got the layers identified - if you're going to have the template why not show what stones are actually in those layers? The other templates for animals and plants are all-inclusive. Your definition on the Uniques is just bizarre to me (and, more egregious, not alphabetical). Seriously, you might as well add in Kobaltite because it's the only bright blue stone. The others are at least economic stones. [[User:Ancient History|Ancient History]] 13:33, 1 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |