v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Editing User talk:Hussell
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
Still in the testing stage. A couple of my key dwarfs were injured recently, and it seems it'll be a few game-years before they recuperate and I can proceed. Meanwhile, I'm taking care of some neglected fortress-improvement projects. Also, it's not absolutely clear to me that these door-based contraptions are superior to the bridge-and-floodgate system, since the change in delay isn't that great, and it's a lot easier to synchronize bridges and floodgates. If there were no delay in pressure plate deactivation, it would be no contest, but as it is, some state transitions take a couple hundred steps, while others happen almost instantly. This can lead to problems in larger circuits if one isn't extremely careful. I've already had to revise several of my designs, and there are still some problems I'm aware of, but haven't figured out how to solve. --[[User:Hussell|Hussell]] 15:06, 22 November 2009 (UTC) | Still in the testing stage. A couple of my key dwarfs were injured recently, and it seems it'll be a few game-years before they recuperate and I can proceed. Meanwhile, I'm taking care of some neglected fortress-improvement projects. Also, it's not absolutely clear to me that these door-based contraptions are superior to the bridge-and-floodgate system, since the change in delay isn't that great, and it's a lot easier to synchronize bridges and floodgates. If there were no delay in pressure plate deactivation, it would be no contest, but as it is, some state transitions take a couple hundred steps, while others happen almost instantly. This can lead to problems in larger circuits if one isn't extremely careful. I've already had to revise several of my designs, and there are still some problems I'm aware of, but haven't figured out how to solve. --[[User:Hussell|Hussell]] 15:06, 22 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
− | + | ---- | |
I think it would be significantly easier for you if you used used [[template:diagram]] rather than [[template:RT]] for your designs. Here's an example using your latch: | I think it would be significantly easier for you if you used used [[template:diagram]] rather than [[template:RT]] for your designs. Here's an example using your latch: | ||
Line 117: | Line 117: | ||
[[User:Hussell|Hussell]] 18:15, 2 December 2009 (UTC) | [[User:Hussell|Hussell]] 18:15, 2 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |