v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Verify"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Its use - not a box style template.) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
How about a nice box like [[template:deletion]]? --[[User:Mizipzor|Mizipzor]] 14:40, 1 November 2007 (EDT) | How about a nice box like [[template:deletion]]? --[[User:Mizipzor|Mizipzor]] 14:40, 1 November 2007 (EDT) | ||
: Because it is one statement that needs verification - not the entire article. This clearly identifies the statement and also allows multiple verification statements in an article. It is akin to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Unreferenced Template:Unreferenced] on Wikipedia that puts in "Citation needed". (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/99_Luftballons for an example) --[[User:Shagie|Shagie]] 14:57, 1 November 2007 (EDT) | : Because it is one statement that needs verification - not the entire article. This clearly identifies the statement and also allows multiple verification statements in an article. It is akin to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Unreferenced Template:Unreferenced] on Wikipedia that puts in "Citation needed". (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/99_Luftballons for an example) --[[User:Shagie|Shagie]] 14:57, 1 November 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | :: I like it that way, useful but not obtrusive. --[[User:Senso|Senso]] 15:03, 1 November 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 19:03, 1 November 2007
How about a nice box like template:deletion? --Mizipzor 14:40, 1 November 2007 (EDT)
- Because it is one statement that needs verification - not the entire article. This clearly identifies the statement and also allows multiple verification statements in an article. It is akin to Template:Unreferenced on Wikipedia that puts in "Citation needed". (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/99_Luftballons for an example) --Shagie 14:57, 1 November 2007 (EDT)
- I like it that way, useful but not obtrusive. --Senso 15:03, 1 November 2007 (EDT)