v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
  • v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
  • Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.

Difference between revisions of "v0.34 Talk:Version number"

From Dwarf Fortress Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (now, it's really a proportion of the whole)
 
(→‎Core vs. Version: Yes, this needs updating if someone can find a source for the details)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Core vs. Version ==
 
== Core vs. Version ==
 
Technically, the version number is now separated from the number of core components completed. Should this be reflected? --[[User:Dree12|Dree12]] ([[User Talk:Dree12|talk]]) 02:05, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 
Technically, the version number is now separated from the number of core components completed. Should this be reflected? --[[User:Dree12|Dree12]] ([[User Talk:Dree12|talk]]) 02:05, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 +
:Yes, I was just thinking the same thing.  The second set of numbers now represents an approximate percent complete, correct?  Though, IIRC, Toady also said that they need make a new list of what needs to go in before it qualifies for v1.0.0 status so they can better estimate that "percentage" number for future versions (I think this was in one of the DFTalk podcasts).  Quoting this from Toady or a similar inside source would be best.  -- [[User:HiEv|<span style="color:#E05858;font-weight:bold;">Hi</span>]][[User talk:HiEv|<span style="color:#C06060;font-weight:bold;">Ev</span>]] 05:17, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:17, 19 May 2012

Core vs. Version

Technically, the version number is now separated from the number of core components completed. Should this be reflected? --Dree12 (talk) 02:05, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Yes, I was just thinking the same thing. The second set of numbers now represents an approximate percent complete, correct? Though, IIRC, Toady also said that they need make a new list of what needs to go in before it qualifies for v1.0.0 status so they can better estimate that "percentage" number for future versions (I think this was in one of the DFTalk podcasts). Quoting this from Toady or a similar inside source would be best. -- HiEv 05:17, 19 May 2012 (UTC)