v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "DF2014 Talk:Dam"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "==Verification page== ignore.") |
(→Real-life image needed?: new section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Verification page== | ==Verification page== | ||
ignore. | ignore. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Real-life image needed? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Is a real-life image of a dam really needed, when there is a in-game image of much the same? The graphics/visualization of Dwarf Fortress is often lackluster, explaining why we have a Wikimedia image instead of just the yellow 'L' for the [[lion]] article. But in cases where large-scale builds are shown using Stonesense/Armok Vision, they aren't. I suggest removing 1) so that 2) doesn't have to compete for space. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 1) [[Image:Dam_preview.png|400px]] 2) [[Image:Unfillable Dam.jpeg|400px]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Voliol|Voliol]] ([[User talk:Voliol|talk]]) 09:45, 24 August 2022 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 09:45, 24 August 2022
Verification page[edit]
ignore.
Real-life image needed?[edit]
Is a real-life image of a dam really needed, when there is a in-game image of much the same? The graphics/visualization of Dwarf Fortress is often lackluster, explaining why we have a Wikimedia image instead of just the yellow 'L' for the lion article. But in cases where large-scale builds are shown using Stonesense/Armok Vision, they aren't. I suggest removing 1) so that 2) doesn't have to compete for space.
1) 
2) 