v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "v0.31 Talk:Gem"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:I personally verified the name, value, and location of every gem in the list when I imported this page from 40d. Everything that hasn't been verified has been marked with a "Verify" note, including the gem colors and a few commented-out sections at the top of the page. --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 21:00, 6 April 2010 (UTC) | :I personally verified the name, value, and location of every gem in the list when I imported this page from 40d. Everything that hasn't been verified has been marked with a "Verify" note, including the gem colors and a few commented-out sections at the top of the page. --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 21:00, 6 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
| − | I have found gems to be more valuable than listed. For example, I am finding rough pink tourmalines valued at 45, and once cut they are valued at 75 | + | I have found gems to be more valuable than listed. For example, although pink tourmalines are listed at a value of 15 I am finding rough pink tourmalines valued at 45, and once cut they are valued at 75. Has anyone else found this? |
--[[User:Monk12|Monk12]] 20:00, 11 April 2010 | --[[User:Monk12|Monk12]] 20:00, 11 April 2010 | ||
Revision as of 00:15, 12 April 2010
Have any new gems been introduced, and have gem values been verified?
The values of many things have changed. – unsigned comment by The Architect
- I personally verified the name, value, and location of every gem in the list when I imported this page from 40d. Everything that hasn't been verified has been marked with a "Verify" note, including the gem colors and a few commented-out sections at the top of the page. --Quietust 21:00, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
I have found gems to be more valuable than listed. For example, although pink tourmalines are listed at a value of 15 I am finding rough pink tourmalines valued at 45, and once cut they are valued at 75. Has anyone else found this? --Monk12 20:00, 11 April 2010