- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Confused"
(→Infobox copies.: new section) |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
::Quoting [[Dwarf_Fortress_Wiki:Quality|here]]: "'''Elven''' quality articles have '''''many''''' of the following characteristics: [...] Contains inaccurate information. '''Human''' quality articles have ALL of the following characteristics: [...] and '''''most''''' of the following characteristics: [...] May have a small amount of information that needs to be verified [...] Contains no inaccurate information [...]". | ::Quoting [[Dwarf_Fortress_Wiki:Quality|here]]: "'''Elven''' quality articles have '''''many''''' of the following characteristics: [...] Contains inaccurate information. '''Human''' quality articles have ALL of the following characteristics: [...] and '''''most''''' of the following characteristics: [...] May have a small amount of information that needs to be verified [...] Contains no inaccurate information [...]". | ||
::Emphasis mine. Additionally please sign your comments. --[[User:Retro|Retro]] 18:44, 13 April 2010 (UTC) | ::Emphasis mine. Additionally please sign your comments. --[[User:Retro|Retro]] 18:44, 13 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Infobox copies. == | ||
| + | |||
| + | If you can identify anything in those infoboxes which I copied over WHICH IS INCORRECT, then CHANGE IT. I DID check over as much of the information as I could, I DID find some things which needed correction, e.g. the keyboard shortcut for [[DF2010:Magma kiln]], so I DID "verify" as much of that info as I could. [[User:DeMatt|DeMatt]] 17:10, 18 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:10, 18 April 2010
Farm plot[edit]
I see what you were talking about now - however, rather than calling the article "completely messed up" (as despite its inaccuracy it was clear enough for a newbie to get the idea) and slapping a big header on it implying the entire article is broken, perhaps you should've just fixed it? Or at least have been more specific about where it was 'messed up'. Or even said something on the discussion page - things like this are what those pages are for.
Additionally, don't just copy/paste a previous version of an article when you are unhappy about someone else's edits. I added a small bit to the 'soil layers' note and you overrode that as well. Please be a bit less impulsive.
And as a side note, the elven/human/dwarven quality tags are largely referring to the quality of an article in terms of itself and its links. 'Elven' pages are generally stubs. If there was an inaccuracy that you were unwilling to fix yourself, at the very least it would be 'human.' --Retro 18:34, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
- I suggest you have a look at the template
- Quoting here: "Elven quality articles have many of the following characteristics: [...] Contains inaccurate information. Human quality articles have ALL of the following characteristics: [...] and most of the following characteristics: [...] May have a small amount of information that needs to be verified [...] Contains no inaccurate information [...]".
- Emphasis mine. Additionally please sign your comments. --Retro 18:44, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Infobox copies.[edit]
If you can identify anything in those infoboxes which I copied over WHICH IS INCORRECT, then CHANGE IT. I DID check over as much of the information as I could, I DID find some things which needed correction, e.g. the keyboard shortcut for DF2010:Magma kiln, so I DID "verify" as much of that info as I could. DeMatt 17:10, 18 April 2010 (UTC)