v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Thecostalnecroplank"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Uristocrat (talk | contribs) (Ack! Who let an elf in here! ;-)) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:A statement easily coded into the instruction set of a spambot. Therefore, I do hereby defy thee to prove otherwise! --[[User:DeMatt|DeMatt]] 03:26, 9 February 2011 (UTC) | :A statement easily coded into the instruction set of a spambot. Therefore, I do hereby defy thee to prove otherwise! --[[User:DeMatt|DeMatt]] 03:26, 9 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
::We shall see. [[user:Emi|<span style="color:#8a4e4e">Emi</span>]] [[user_talk:Emi|<span style="color:#6a3e4e">[T]</span>]] 03:42, 9 February 2011 (UTC) | ::We shall see. [[user:Emi|<span style="color:#8a4e4e">Emi</span>]] [[user_talk:Emi|<span style="color:#6a3e4e">[T]</span>]] 03:42, 9 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::Can a spambot lie? --[[User:Briess|Briess]] 04:17, 9 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::I'm sure they can lie, but I haven't seen them make an edit that wasn't filled with spam links to massively vandalized wikis. I say we test him by asking him for his favorite three types of unfortunate accident ;-) [[User:Uristocrat|Uristocrat]] 08:24, 9 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Nobles are wonderful and enlightened rulers whose edicts must be obeyed. It is against my programming to cause or allow their deaths. | ||
| + | :Ack! It's worse than I thought! He's not a spambot, he's an *elfbot*! ;-) [[User:Uristocrat|Uristocrat]] 05:28, 11 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 05:28, 11 February 2011
Hi. Not a spambot.
- A statement easily coded into the instruction set of a spambot. Therefore, I do hereby defy thee to prove otherwise! --DeMatt 03:26, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- We shall see. Emi [T] 03:42, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- Can a spambot lie? --Briess 04:17, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- I'm sure they can lie, but I haven't seen them make an edit that wasn't filled with spam links to massively vandalized wikis. I say we test him by asking him for his favorite three types of unfortunate accident ;-) Uristocrat 08:24, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- Can a spambot lie? --Briess 04:17, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- We shall see. Emi [T] 03:42, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Nobles are wonderful and enlightened rulers whose edicts must be obeyed. It is against my programming to cause or allow their deaths.
- Ack! It's worse than I thought! He's not a spambot, he's an *elfbot*! ;-) Uristocrat 05:28, 11 February 2011 (UTC)