v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "40d Talk:Sweet pod"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (moved Talk:Broken/40d\x3aSweet pod to 40d Talk:Sweet pod: Fixing talk page name (634/738)) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
::That is your definition (only) and toady said nothing like that about syrup. Booze is intended as end product - syrup (uncooked) cant even be eaten, so you ''must'' cook it. --[[User:Koltom|Koltom]] 21:34, 5 April 2008 (EDT) | ::That is your definition (only) and toady said nothing like that about syrup. Booze is intended as end product - syrup (uncooked) cant even be eaten, so you ''must'' cook it. --[[User:Koltom|Koltom]] 21:34, 5 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | :::syrup, and massive trapsploitation are intended-free energy is not, and quantum stockpiles are just making a trash heap and need to be nerfed, not obliterated, If anything. sweet pods-booze-food is an exploit because it leaves you with seeds-which making the syrup does not {{unsigned|Eerr}} | ||
Latest revision as of 21:53, 8 March 2010
no mention of dwarven rum? --Moller 03:44, 2 November 2007 (EDT)
Ha, my appologies on that one. I checked my list of alcohol for quarry bushes/leaves, but didn't for sweet pods! How forgetful of me, maybe I should get to bed before I either forget something else, or make a massive collection of typos (I'm having trouble, you just can't tell). --Draco18s 03:49, 2 November 2007 (EDT)
Does milling into sugar really give 5 sugar/pod? I always thought it was Milling: 1 food/pod vs. Syrup: 5 food/pod? Otherdwarf 08:36, 8 November 2007 (EST)
- I'd like some verification on this as well, it really should be put into the page. I thought one was more labor intensive than the other, but gave a lot more food. Currently it looks like there is no difference in the processing, they are the same value.
- (38c) Yes, Sweet pods are ground into dwarven sugar at 1:1 ratio but processed into syrup at 1:5 ratio. Guess whats more economic. Depending on skill a wind-mill-stone is faster,a quern not, but workers are hardly ever scarce, right? --Koltom 16:29, 3 April 2008 (EDT)
Don't think it's appropriate to call doing anything legal within the game's engine (and apparently within its intent) a 'cheat'. --Geofferic 19:32, 3 April 2008 (EDT)
- Quantum dump stockpiles not withstanding? --Chrispy 20:09, 3 April 2008 (EDT)
- If I recall correctly (it has been a long time), Toady himself said that the boozecooking exploit is not intended and will be eventually fixed. I think he even used the word "cheat" to refer to it.
- Things like free energy, quantum stockpiles, infinite water, and deadly trap-spams are cheats.
- In general, if it shouldn't be possible and doesn't make sense but is possible and if the plan is to make it not possible, it is a cheat. --Savok 11:50, 4 April 2008 (EDT)
- That is your definition (only) and toady said nothing like that about syrup. Booze is intended as end product - syrup (uncooked) cant even be eaten, so you must cook it. --Koltom 21:34, 5 April 2008 (EDT)
- syrup, and massive trapsploitation are intended-free energy is not, and quantum stockpiles are just making a trash heap and need to be nerfed, not obliterated, If anything. sweet pods-booze-food is an exploit because it leaves you with seeds-which making the syrup does not – unsigned comment by Eerr
- That is your definition (only) and toady said nothing like that about syrup. Booze is intended as end product - syrup (uncooked) cant even be eaten, so you must cook it. --Koltom 21:34, 5 April 2008 (EDT)