- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
Difference between revisions of "User talk:PT Fort"
(commenting on new flowchart) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I have no idea what's up with SVG rendering, though (Mediawiki converts SVG's to PNG's, and that seems to be broken at the moment). I'll get Briess to look into that when he gets a chance. —[[User:Lethosor|<span style="color:#074">Lethosor</span>]] ([[User talk:Lethosor|<span style="color:#092">talk</span>]]) 03:48, 18 January 2014 (UTC) | I have no idea what's up with SVG rendering, though (Mediawiki converts SVG's to PNG's, and that seems to be broken at the moment). I'll get Briess to look into that when he gets a chance. —[[User:Lethosor|<span style="color:#074">Lethosor</span>]] ([[User talk:Lethosor|<span style="color:#092">talk</span>]]) 03:48, 18 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | :SVG rendering should be working now. —[[User:Lethosor|<span style="color:#074">Lethosor</span>]] ([[User talk:Lethosor|<span style="color:#092">talk</span>]]) 17:01, 22 January 2014 (UTC) | |
Sorry to be a poor sport, but the flowchart you made is quite confusing. The first impression I got was: "Whoa, What the...". There are two addressable problems that I would take care of: In comparison with the previous flowchart, yours isn't leveled. Flowcharts usually follow a set of levels, where each level usually means a step in a progressive set of instructions. You scattered most of the items around. It's hard on the eyes to not follow a near straight vertical direction. | Sorry to be a poor sport, but the flowchart you made is quite confusing. The first impression I got was: "Whoa, What the...". There are two addressable problems that I would take care of: In comparison with the previous flowchart, yours isn't leveled. Flowcharts usually follow a set of levels, where each level usually means a step in a progressive set of instructions. You scattered most of the items around. It's hard on the eyes to not follow a near straight vertical direction. | ||
Latest revision as of 17:01, 22 January 2014
Nice work on the flowchart!
I have no idea what's up with SVG rendering, though (Mediawiki converts SVG's to PNG's, and that seems to be broken at the moment). I'll get Briess to look into that when he gets a chance. —Lethosor (talk) 03:48, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
Sorry to be a poor sport, but the flowchart you made is quite confusing. The first impression I got was: "Whoa, What the...". There are two addressable problems that I would take care of: In comparison with the previous flowchart, yours isn't leveled. Flowcharts usually follow a set of levels, where each level usually means a step in a progressive set of instructions. You scattered most of the items around. It's hard on the eyes to not follow a near straight vertical direction. This and the left connection is clipped (or too near the edge to be seen).
There are my two cents, overall I'm not against the flowchart.--Doktoro Reichard (talk) 09:45, 18 January 2014 (UTC)