- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
Difference between revisions of "DF2014 Talk:System requirements"
(Creating page - requested by 128.59.151.187 (talk | contribs)) |
m (sign) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<!-- Page created automatically - requested by 128.59.151.187 --> | <!-- Page created automatically - requested by 128.59.151.187 --> | ||
| + | |||
| + | == More rigorous testing? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Should we try to clean up the Sys-req page? | ||
| + | |||
| + | So far we have three data points none in the same case, all relatively small, all relatively shallow, across 3 different PC's. | ||
| + | |||
| + | It seems like the best thing to do would be to: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Use one low, mid, and possibly high end computer (not sure if high end is necessary, unless even a top shelf rig would lag running DF) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Test for speed in both DF and adventurer mode | ||
| + | |||
| + | Test for speed in multiple conditions: | ||
| + | Elapsed time during world creation for a variety of conditions. | ||
| + | In Fort mode: | ||
| + | just after embark, | ||
| + | after one year, | ||
| + | after multiple years, | ||
| + | after exploring all caverns, | ||
| + | with a constant flow of water | ||
| + | with different numbers of PC's and NPC's (starting 7 vs 200 dorfs and a zombie invasion) | ||
| + | and in adventurer mode in the wilderness, in lairs, in keeps, sewers, dark pits, mountain forts, etc. | ||
| + | |||
| + | And I hereby nominate someone else to do it, as my rig (2007 MacBook Pro with 2.5GHz Intel Core 2 Duo with 4GB of 667MHz DDR2 SRAM) is completely insufficient for an advanced Fort, and any kind of DF adventurer game. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Since there's a mention that it's really RAM latency that matters most, should I put 667MHz as a practical lower limit on an enjoyable DF experience? I can play a 100 dwarf fort pretty well, even digging to the caverns, as long as I burn all corpse parts and sell all clothing and other junk for high value perishables to keep item count low. Adv mode, forget it. <small>– [[template:unsigned|unsigned]] comment by [[User:128.59.151.187|128.59.151.187]]</small> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:03, 20 August 2014
More rigorous testing?[edit]
Should we try to clean up the Sys-req page?
So far we have three data points none in the same case, all relatively small, all relatively shallow, across 3 different PC's.
It seems like the best thing to do would be to:
Use one low, mid, and possibly high end computer (not sure if high end is necessary, unless even a top shelf rig would lag running DF)
Test for speed in both DF and adventurer mode
Test for speed in multiple conditions: Elapsed time during world creation for a variety of conditions. In Fort mode: just after embark, after one year, after multiple years, after exploring all caverns, with a constant flow of water with different numbers of PC's and NPC's (starting 7 vs 200 dorfs and a zombie invasion) and in adventurer mode in the wilderness, in lairs, in keeps, sewers, dark pits, mountain forts, etc.
And I hereby nominate someone else to do it, as my rig (2007 MacBook Pro with 2.5GHz Intel Core 2 Duo with 4GB of 667MHz DDR2 SRAM) is completely insufficient for an advanced Fort, and any kind of DF adventurer game.
Since there's a mention that it's really RAM latency that matters most, should I put 667MHz as a practical lower limit on an enjoyable DF experience? I can play a 100 dwarf fort pretty well, even digging to the caverns, as long as I burn all corpse parts and sell all clothing and other junk for high value perishables to keep item count low. Adv mode, forget it. – unsigned comment by 128.59.151.187