v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Newbie"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(What do you think?) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | ==Suggestion== | + | == Suggestion == |
| − | |||
| − | I've seen a statement to that effect made several times, and User Courtesy would dictate it as a Golden Rule... but, so is signing etc. | + | Adding a line that says something along the lines of "Please refrain from editing other people's User page unless they state it's desired. Comments etc. should go on User talk pages instead."<br> |
| + | I've seen a statement to that effect made several times, and User Courtesy would dictate it as a Golden Rule... but, so is signing etc.<br> | ||
| + | What do other people think of adding that to the template?<br> | ||
| + | After all, this template probably has one of the biggest impacts on molding our newest users into well-developed and useful editors.<br> | ||
| + | --[[User:N9103|Edward]] 06:23, 28 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I'd go for it, but in my past experience (I've been busy and not on much) that doesn't happen much. Different now? --[[User:Savok|Savok]] 16:31, 27 May 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Seems to be different now. | ||
| + | ::Oh, and don't put blank lines in the middle of your comments. --[[User:Savok|Savok]] 08:54, 3 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == "This is a template." == | ||
| − | + | If they are newbies, they may not know what that means, which is why I said that the template was impersonal and that some of it may not apply to them. I guess that I mean that we may not be correcting them with all of it - they could have gotten some things right. --[[User:Savok|Savok]] 15:12, 10 July 2008 (EDT) | |
| − | |||
| − | --[[User: | + | :Saying they haven't necessarily done anything wrong is good, but saying it doesn't apply is bad. [[User:VengefulDonut|VengefulDonut]] 12:41, 22 July 2008 (EDT) |
| + | |||
| + | ::"This is a template." -> "This is a template, so it is possible that you are already following some of these guidelines."? Unlike "may not apply", which implies exemptness, "you might be following most of these rules already" or the like would be much better. Thoughts? --[[User:GreyMario|GreyMaria]] 15:03, 22 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 19:03, 22 October 2008
Suggestion[edit]
Adding a line that says something along the lines of "Please refrain from editing other people's User page unless they state it's desired. Comments etc. should go on User talk pages instead."
I've seen a statement to that effect made several times, and User Courtesy would dictate it as a Golden Rule... but, so is signing etc.
What do other people think of adding that to the template?
After all, this template probably has one of the biggest impacts on molding our newest users into well-developed and useful editors.
--Edward 06:23, 28 April 2008 (EDT)
- I'd go for it, but in my past experience (I've been busy and not on much) that doesn't happen much. Different now? --Savok 16:31, 27 May 2008 (EDT)
- Seems to be different now.
- Oh, and don't put blank lines in the middle of your comments. --Savok 08:54, 3 June 2008 (EDT)
"This is a template."[edit]
If they are newbies, they may not know what that means, which is why I said that the template was impersonal and that some of it may not apply to them. I guess that I mean that we may not be correcting them with all of it - they could have gotten some things right. --Savok 15:12, 10 July 2008 (EDT)
- Saying they haven't necessarily done anything wrong is good, but saying it doesn't apply is bad. VengefulDonut 12:41, 22 July 2008 (EDT)
- "This is a template." -> "This is a template, so it is possible that you are already following some of these guidelines."? Unlike "may not apply", which implies exemptness, "you might be following most of these rules already" or the like would be much better. Thoughts? --GreyMaria 15:03, 22 October 2008 (EDT)