- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
Difference between revisions of "40d Talk:Loosing"
m (moved Talk:Broken/40d\x3aLoosing to 40d Talk:Loosing) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
This page made my day. You guys should do effect/affect next. --[[User:HebaruSan|HebaruSan]] 21:37, 31 October 2009 (UTC) | This page made my day. You guys should do effect/affect next. --[[User:HebaruSan|HebaruSan]] 21:37, 31 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Oh Armok no! There way too many esoteric meanings to keep the page stable and it isn't pertinent to DF anyway. | ||
| + | ::I agree with the latter poster; seems like an unnecessary page. Besides, who's so stupid as to confuse "losing" with "loosing"? If that elicits a, "Hey!" then go and finish up middle school before posting on here. ;P --[[Special:Contributions/76.110.216.178|76.110.216.178]] 03:34, 28 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::Wow, that's nice. "Welcome to the internet, everyone's a douche!" Also confuses ignorance with stupidity and assumes everyone speaks English fluently/natively. [[User:Oddtwang of Dork|Oddtwang of Dork]] 12:11, 30 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 12:11, 30 April 2010
Yeah, normal prose style fits better than sounding like the OED. Should we go completely overboard and give pronunciation advice too? Anydwarf 14:30, 2 June 2008 (EDT)
- If you'd like to. This is a silly page - do with it what you will! Except, don't make it serious. --Savok 17:11, 2 June 2008 (EDT)
-_-[edit]
Just because I made one mistake... --User:Peewee, unsigned
- You aren't the only one. --Savok 22:53, 10 June 2008 (EDT)
Delete?[edit]
People still make this mistake. I don't see anything wrong with trying to show people Exactly how they're wrong, rather than just a simple redirect, which they may never notice that could cause them to still think it's spelled loosing, and in some cases go through and replace an entire articles use of the word lose with the word loose. Shardok 20:45, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
-Don't delete it its hilarious! A perfect D for Dwarf. Elliott Thinas 03:33, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
- I dont mind if it stays either --Koltom 14:26, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
- +1 for keeping! Teh only peeple who will find it argh tho'se who knead too. Do'nt delete it, you loosers.--Albedo 16:15, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
- All right all right! I give in! (I do like how a lot of the unpopular changes I've made lately have resulted in better pages anyway. LMAO @ Albedo's comment on the main page) 3lB33 19:04, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
This page made my day. You guys should do effect/affect next. --HebaruSan 21:37, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
- Oh Armok no! There way too many esoteric meanings to keep the page stable and it isn't pertinent to DF anyway.
- I agree with the latter poster; seems like an unnecessary page. Besides, who's so stupid as to confuse "losing" with "loosing"? If that elicits a, "Hey!" then go and finish up middle school before posting on here. ;P --76.110.216.178 03:34, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
- Wow, that's nice. "Welcome to the internet, everyone's a douche!" Also confuses ignorance with stupidity and assumes everyone speaks English fluently/natively. Oddtwang of Dork 12:11, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- I agree with the latter poster; seems like an unnecessary page. Besides, who's so stupid as to confuse "losing" with "loosing"? If that elicits a, "Hey!" then go and finish up middle school before posting on here. ;P --76.110.216.178 03:34, 28 April 2010 (UTC)